利福平联合治疗耐甲氧西林葡萄球菌假体关节感染:52,588例髋关节置换术患者的索赔数据库评估

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Ayaka Nitta, Mitsuhiro Goda, Takahiro Niimura, Toshiki Kajihara, Maki Sato, Masayuki Chuma, Kei Kawada, Kaito Tsujinaka, Koji Miyata, Yuki Kono, Fuka Aizawa, Kenta Yagi, Yuki Izawa-Ishizawa, Keisuke Ishizawa
{"title":"利福平联合治疗耐甲氧西林葡萄球菌假体关节感染:52,588例髋关节置换术患者的索赔数据库评估","authors":"Ayaka Nitta, Mitsuhiro Goda, Takahiro Niimura, Toshiki Kajihara, Maki Sato, Masayuki Chuma, Kei Kawada, Kaito Tsujinaka, Koji Miyata, Yuki Kono, Fuka Aizawa, Kenta Yagi, Yuki Izawa-Ishizawa, Keisuke Ishizawa","doi":"10.5414/CP204740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hip arthroplasty is a common surgical procedure effective for pain relief and maintaining walking function. Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication. Rifampicin combination therapy is widely used to treat PJIs caused by <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> or coagulase-negative <i>Staphylococcus</i>, which are challenging to treat due to biofilm formation. However, its effectiveness is unclear. The effectiveness of anti-methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) antibiotics combined with rifampicin is also unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assessed the effectiveness and safety of MRSA antibiotics combined with rifampicin for treating methicillin-resistant staphylococcal PJI using a Japanese clinical database.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis used the claims database to examine data on PJI after hip arthroplasty among patients aged 20 years or older who were treated with anti-MRSA antibiotics, with or without rifampicin, from 2014 to 2021. The primary outcome was defined as no revision arthroplasty, while the safety outcomes were renal dysfunction and hypersensitivity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 52,588 patients who underwent hip replacement or artificial head insertion surgeries, 53 were treated for PJI with anti-MRSA antibiotics and received debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention, with 33 without rifampicin and 20 with rifampicin. The incidence of revision arthroplasty did not differ significantly between the two groups (3 vs. 5 patients; log-rank test, p = 0.195). The incidence of adverse events was similar between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this analysis, rifampicin combination therapy provided no additional benefit in treating methicillin-resistant PJI after hip replacement surgery. If used together, close monitoring for the occurrence of adverse effects is advised.</p>","PeriodicalId":13963,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rifampicin in combination treatments for methicillin-resistant staphylococcal prosthetic joint infections: Claims database evaluation using a cohort of 52,588 hip arthroplasty patients.\",\"authors\":\"Ayaka Nitta, Mitsuhiro Goda, Takahiro Niimura, Toshiki Kajihara, Maki Sato, Masayuki Chuma, Kei Kawada, Kaito Tsujinaka, Koji Miyata, Yuki Kono, Fuka Aizawa, Kenta Yagi, Yuki Izawa-Ishizawa, Keisuke Ishizawa\",\"doi\":\"10.5414/CP204740\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hip arthroplasty is a common surgical procedure effective for pain relief and maintaining walking function. Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication. Rifampicin combination therapy is widely used to treat PJIs caused by <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> or coagulase-negative <i>Staphylococcus</i>, which are challenging to treat due to biofilm formation. However, its effectiveness is unclear. The effectiveness of anti-methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) antibiotics combined with rifampicin is also unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assessed the effectiveness and safety of MRSA antibiotics combined with rifampicin for treating methicillin-resistant staphylococcal PJI using a Japanese clinical database.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis used the claims database to examine data on PJI after hip arthroplasty among patients aged 20 years or older who were treated with anti-MRSA antibiotics, with or without rifampicin, from 2014 to 2021. The primary outcome was defined as no revision arthroplasty, while the safety outcomes were renal dysfunction and hypersensitivity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 52,588 patients who underwent hip replacement or artificial head insertion surgeries, 53 were treated for PJI with anti-MRSA antibiotics and received debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention, with 33 without rifampicin and 20 with rifampicin. The incidence of revision arthroplasty did not differ significantly between the two groups (3 vs. 5 patients; log-rank test, p = 0.195). The incidence of adverse events was similar between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this analysis, rifampicin combination therapy provided no additional benefit in treating methicillin-resistant PJI after hip replacement surgery. If used together, close monitoring for the occurrence of adverse effects is advised.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5414/CP204740\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5414/CP204740","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:髋关节置换术是一种常见的外科手术,对缓解疼痛和维持行走功能有效。人工关节感染(PJI)是严重的并发症。利福平联合治疗被广泛用于治疗由金黄色葡萄球菌或凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌引起的PJIs,这些PJIs由于生物膜的形成而具有挑战性。然而,其有效性尚不清楚。抗甲氧西林耐药金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)抗生素联合利福平的有效性也不清楚。目的:本研究利用日本临床数据库评估MRSA抗生素联合利福平治疗耐甲氧西林葡萄球菌PJI的有效性和安全性。材料和方法:本回顾性分析使用索赔数据库检查2014年至2021年期间接受抗mrsa抗生素治疗(含或不含利福平)的20岁及以上患者髋关节置换术后PJI数据。主要结局被定义为无翻修性关节置换术,而安全性结局是肾功能不全和过敏。结果:52,588例接受髋关节置换术或人工头部植入手术的患者中,53例使用抗mrsa抗生素治疗PJI,并接受清创、抗生素和植入物保留,其中33例未使用利福平,20例使用利福平。两组间翻修性关节置换术的发生率无显著差异(3例vs. 5例;Log-rank检验,p = 0.195)。两组不良事件发生率相似。结论:在本分析中,利福平联合治疗对髋关节置换术后耐甲氧西林PJI没有额外的益处。如果同时使用,建议密切监测不良反应的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rifampicin in combination treatments for methicillin-resistant staphylococcal prosthetic joint infections: Claims database evaluation using a cohort of 52,588 hip arthroplasty patients.

Background: Hip arthroplasty is a common surgical procedure effective for pain relief and maintaining walking function. Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication. Rifampicin combination therapy is widely used to treat PJIs caused by Staphylococcus aureus or coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, which are challenging to treat due to biofilm formation. However, its effectiveness is unclear. The effectiveness of anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) antibiotics combined with rifampicin is also unclear.

Objective: This study assessed the effectiveness and safety of MRSA antibiotics combined with rifampicin for treating methicillin-resistant staphylococcal PJI using a Japanese clinical database.

Materials and methods: This retrospective analysis used the claims database to examine data on PJI after hip arthroplasty among patients aged 20 years or older who were treated with anti-MRSA antibiotics, with or without rifampicin, from 2014 to 2021. The primary outcome was defined as no revision arthroplasty, while the safety outcomes were renal dysfunction and hypersensitivity.

Results: Among 52,588 patients who underwent hip replacement or artificial head insertion surgeries, 53 were treated for PJI with anti-MRSA antibiotics and received debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention, with 33 without rifampicin and 20 with rifampicin. The incidence of revision arthroplasty did not differ significantly between the two groups (3 vs. 5 patients; log-rank test, p = 0.195). The incidence of adverse events was similar between the two groups.

Conclusion: In this analysis, rifampicin combination therapy provided no additional benefit in treating methicillin-resistant PJI after hip replacement surgery. If used together, close monitoring for the occurrence of adverse effects is advised.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics appears monthly and publishes manuscripts containing original material with emphasis on the following topics: Clinical trials, Pharmacoepidemiology - Pharmacovigilance, Pharmacodynamics, Drug disposition and Pharmacokinetics, Quality assurance, Pharmacogenetics, Biotechnological drugs such as cytokines and recombinant antibiotics. Case reports on adverse reactions are also of interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信