日本预防生活方式相关疾病老年人痴呆的多模式干预试验:一项基于社区、为期18个月的随机对照试验

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Keiko Ide, Shunsaku Mizushima, Kyoko Saito, Hiroko Suzuki, Yuhei Chiba, Kie Abe, Asuka Yoshimi, Akitoyo Hishimoto, Taro Yamanaka, Takashi Sakurai, Hidenori Arai, Masataka Taguri, Shoko Suzuki, Toshinari Odawara
{"title":"日本预防生活方式相关疾病老年人痴呆的多模式干预试验:一项基于社区、为期18个月的随机对照试验","authors":"Keiko Ide, Shunsaku Mizushima, Kyoko Saito, Hiroko Suzuki, Yuhei Chiba, Kie Abe, Asuka Yoshimi, Akitoyo Hishimoto, Taro Yamanaka, Takashi Sakurai, Hidenori Arai, Masataka Taguri, Shoko Suzuki, Toshinari Odawara","doi":"10.1177/13872877251344222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe prevalence of Alzheimer's disease is increasing in Japan, highlighting the need to establish evidence-based strategies for its prevention.ObjectiveWe aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a multimodal community-based intervention for Japanese older people with lifestyle-related diseases and to identify challenges in implementing such interventions to prevent dementia in local communities.MethodsAn 18-month randomized controlled trial was conducted among individuals aged 65-85 years with lifestyle-related diseases (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, overweight/underweight, smoking), residing in a single apartment complex. Participants were randomly assigned to a multimodal intervention group (group-based physical exercise, nutritional guidance, management of lifestyle-related diseases, and cognitive training) or a control group. The primary outcome was the change in the composite score derived from seven neuropsychological tests. The trial was registered (UMIN000041887: September 24, 2020).ResultsOf 224 screened individuals, 198 were randomized (99 in each group), and 175 (88.4%) completed the 18-month assessment. There was no significant difference between the intervention and control groups in the primary outcome (change in composite test score: 0.25; 95% confidence interval 0.16 to 0.33 versus 0.29; 95% confidence interval 0.20 to 0.38, respectively; <i>p</i> <i>=</i> 0.463). However, a subgroup analysis of participants with mild cognitive impairment showed a significant intervention effect on changes in logical memory, for both immediate (<i>p</i> = 0.041) and delayed recall tasks (<i>p</i> <i>=</i> 0.043).ConclusionsThis multimodal intervention program demonstrated no effectiveness in mitigating cognitive decline. Further research is needed to develop more effective strategies and to better define target populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"574-588"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Japan-multimodal intervention trial for the prevention of dementia in older people with lifestyle-related diseases: A community-based, 18-month, randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Keiko Ide, Shunsaku Mizushima, Kyoko Saito, Hiroko Suzuki, Yuhei Chiba, Kie Abe, Asuka Yoshimi, Akitoyo Hishimoto, Taro Yamanaka, Takashi Sakurai, Hidenori Arai, Masataka Taguri, Shoko Suzuki, Toshinari Odawara\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13872877251344222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundThe prevalence of Alzheimer's disease is increasing in Japan, highlighting the need to establish evidence-based strategies for its prevention.ObjectiveWe aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a multimodal community-based intervention for Japanese older people with lifestyle-related diseases and to identify challenges in implementing such interventions to prevent dementia in local communities.MethodsAn 18-month randomized controlled trial was conducted among individuals aged 65-85 years with lifestyle-related diseases (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, overweight/underweight, smoking), residing in a single apartment complex. Participants were randomly assigned to a multimodal intervention group (group-based physical exercise, nutritional guidance, management of lifestyle-related diseases, and cognitive training) or a control group. The primary outcome was the change in the composite score derived from seven neuropsychological tests. The trial was registered (UMIN000041887: September 24, 2020).ResultsOf 224 screened individuals, 198 were randomized (99 in each group), and 175 (88.4%) completed the 18-month assessment. There was no significant difference between the intervention and control groups in the primary outcome (change in composite test score: 0.25; 95% confidence interval 0.16 to 0.33 versus 0.29; 95% confidence interval 0.20 to 0.38, respectively; <i>p</i> <i>=</i> 0.463). However, a subgroup analysis of participants with mild cognitive impairment showed a significant intervention effect on changes in logical memory, for both immediate (<i>p</i> = 0.041) and delayed recall tasks (<i>p</i> <i>=</i> 0.043).ConclusionsThis multimodal intervention program demonstrated no effectiveness in mitigating cognitive decline. Further research is needed to develop more effective strategies and to better define target populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"574-588\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251344222\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251344222","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在日本,阿尔茨海默病的患病率正在上升,这凸显了建立以证据为基础的预防策略的必要性。本研究旨在评估多模式社区干预对日本生活方式相关疾病老年人的有效性,并确定在当地社区实施此类干预以预防痴呆的挑战。方法对生活方式相关疾病(高血压、高脂血症、糖尿病、超重/体重不足、吸烟)的65 ~ 85岁独居公寓楼患者进行为期18个月的随机对照试验。参与者被随机分配到多模式干预组(以小组为基础的体育锻炼、营养指导、生活方式相关疾病的管理和认知训练)或对照组。主要结果是由七项神经心理测试得出的综合得分的变化。该试验已注册(UMIN000041887: September 24, 2020)。结果224名筛查个体中,198名随机抽取(每组99名),175名(88.4%)完成了为期18个月的评估。干预组与对照组在主要转归上无显著差异(综合测试得分变化:0.25;95%置信区间0.16 ~ 0.33 vs 0.29;95%置信区间分别为0.20 ~ 0.38;p = 0.463)。然而,对轻度认知障碍参与者的亚组分析显示,干预对逻辑记忆的改变有显著的影响,无论是即时记忆任务(p = 0.041)还是延迟记忆任务(p = 0.043)。结论:这种多模式干预方案在减轻认知能力下降方面没有效果。需要进行进一步的研究,以制定更有效的战略和更好地确定目标人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Japan-multimodal intervention trial for the prevention of dementia in older people with lifestyle-related diseases: A community-based, 18-month, randomized controlled trial.

BackgroundThe prevalence of Alzheimer's disease is increasing in Japan, highlighting the need to establish evidence-based strategies for its prevention.ObjectiveWe aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a multimodal community-based intervention for Japanese older people with lifestyle-related diseases and to identify challenges in implementing such interventions to prevent dementia in local communities.MethodsAn 18-month randomized controlled trial was conducted among individuals aged 65-85 years with lifestyle-related diseases (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, overweight/underweight, smoking), residing in a single apartment complex. Participants were randomly assigned to a multimodal intervention group (group-based physical exercise, nutritional guidance, management of lifestyle-related diseases, and cognitive training) or a control group. The primary outcome was the change in the composite score derived from seven neuropsychological tests. The trial was registered (UMIN000041887: September 24, 2020).ResultsOf 224 screened individuals, 198 were randomized (99 in each group), and 175 (88.4%) completed the 18-month assessment. There was no significant difference between the intervention and control groups in the primary outcome (change in composite test score: 0.25; 95% confidence interval 0.16 to 0.33 versus 0.29; 95% confidence interval 0.20 to 0.38, respectively; p= 0.463). However, a subgroup analysis of participants with mild cognitive impairment showed a significant intervention effect on changes in logical memory, for both immediate (p = 0.041) and delayed recall tasks (p= 0.043).ConclusionsThis multimodal intervention program demonstrated no effectiveness in mitigating cognitive decline. Further research is needed to develop more effective strategies and to better define target populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信