谈判中的认知和情感参与:来自脑电图和近红外超扫描的见解。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Carlotta Acconito, Katia Rovelli, Federica Saquella, Michela Balconi
{"title":"谈判中的认知和情感参与:来自脑电图和近红外超扫描的见解。","authors":"Carlotta Acconito, Katia Rovelli, Federica Saquella, Michela Balconi","doi":"10.1007/s00221-025-07093-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In negotiation, individuals collaborate to achieve a shared goal and reach a mutual agreement by understanding their partner's intentions and adapting to them. Unlike most social cognition studies that investigate brain activity in individuals separately, this study employed an innovative hyperscanning approach, which is able to explore the inter-brain synchronization during negotiation. 26 students, divided into 13 dyads, participated in a negotiation decision-making task, requiring convergence on a shared course of action. The interaction was segmented offline into three phases: opener (sharing of individual opinions), central (negotiation), and final phase (shared decision). Electrophysiological (EEG delta, theta, alpha, beta and gamma bands) and hemodynamic (oxygenated-OHb and deoxygenated-HHb hemoglobin) data were collected. Higher HHb levels were observed during the central phase compared to the final phase, suggesting a relative decrease in frontal activation, potentially due to a shift in cognitive processing toward temporoparietal regions, as indicated by EEG findings. Increased delta, theta, and alpha activity was reported in the frontal area, suggesting the engagement of emotional and motivational systems as well as cortical resources for information processing. Finally, beta and gamma bands showed higher activity in the temporo-central and parieto-occipital areas, indicating the activation of perspective-taking. This study highlights how hyperscanning reveals the neural mechanisms of negotiation, where emotional, cognitive, and perspective-taking processes converge.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":"243 6","pages":"151"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive and emotional engagement in negotiation: insights from EEG and fNIRS Hyperscanning.\",\"authors\":\"Carlotta Acconito, Katia Rovelli, Federica Saquella, Michela Balconi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00221-025-07093-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In negotiation, individuals collaborate to achieve a shared goal and reach a mutual agreement by understanding their partner's intentions and adapting to them. Unlike most social cognition studies that investigate brain activity in individuals separately, this study employed an innovative hyperscanning approach, which is able to explore the inter-brain synchronization during negotiation. 26 students, divided into 13 dyads, participated in a negotiation decision-making task, requiring convergence on a shared course of action. The interaction was segmented offline into three phases: opener (sharing of individual opinions), central (negotiation), and final phase (shared decision). Electrophysiological (EEG delta, theta, alpha, beta and gamma bands) and hemodynamic (oxygenated-OHb and deoxygenated-HHb hemoglobin) data were collected. Higher HHb levels were observed during the central phase compared to the final phase, suggesting a relative decrease in frontal activation, potentially due to a shift in cognitive processing toward temporoparietal regions, as indicated by EEG findings. Increased delta, theta, and alpha activity was reported in the frontal area, suggesting the engagement of emotional and motivational systems as well as cortical resources for information processing. Finally, beta and gamma bands showed higher activity in the temporo-central and parieto-occipital areas, indicating the activation of perspective-taking. This study highlights how hyperscanning reveals the neural mechanisms of negotiation, where emotional, cognitive, and perspective-taking processes converge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental Brain Research\",\"volume\":\"243 6\",\"pages\":\"151\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental Brain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-025-07093-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-025-07093-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在谈判中,个体通过合作来实现共同的目标,并通过理解合作伙伴的意图并适应他们的意图来达成共同的协议。与大多数社会认知研究不同的是,本研究采用了一种创新的超扫描方法,能够探索谈判过程中的脑间同步。26名学生被分成13对,参加了一项谈判决策任务,要求他们在共同的行动方案上达成一致。这种互动在线下分为三个阶段:开启阶段(分享个人意见)、中心阶段(协商)和最后阶段(共同决策)。收集电生理(EEG δ、θ、α、β和γ波段)和血流动力学(氧合ohb和脱氧hbb血红蛋白)数据。与最后阶段相比,在中央阶段观察到较高的hbb水平,表明额叶激活相对减少,可能是由于认知处理向颞顶叶区域转移,正如脑电图结果所示。据报道,额叶区域的δ、θ和α活动增加,表明情绪和动机系统以及用于信息处理的皮质资源参与其中。最后,β和γ波段在颞-中央和顶-枕区显示出更高的活动,表明观点采取的激活。这项研究强调了超扫描如何揭示谈判的神经机制,在这里,情感、认知和换位思考过程汇聚在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cognitive and emotional engagement in negotiation: insights from EEG and fNIRS Hyperscanning.

In negotiation, individuals collaborate to achieve a shared goal and reach a mutual agreement by understanding their partner's intentions and adapting to them. Unlike most social cognition studies that investigate brain activity in individuals separately, this study employed an innovative hyperscanning approach, which is able to explore the inter-brain synchronization during negotiation. 26 students, divided into 13 dyads, participated in a negotiation decision-making task, requiring convergence on a shared course of action. The interaction was segmented offline into three phases: opener (sharing of individual opinions), central (negotiation), and final phase (shared decision). Electrophysiological (EEG delta, theta, alpha, beta and gamma bands) and hemodynamic (oxygenated-OHb and deoxygenated-HHb hemoglobin) data were collected. Higher HHb levels were observed during the central phase compared to the final phase, suggesting a relative decrease in frontal activation, potentially due to a shift in cognitive processing toward temporoparietal regions, as indicated by EEG findings. Increased delta, theta, and alpha activity was reported in the frontal area, suggesting the engagement of emotional and motivational systems as well as cortical resources for information processing. Finally, beta and gamma bands showed higher activity in the temporo-central and parieto-occipital areas, indicating the activation of perspective-taking. This study highlights how hyperscanning reveals the neural mechanisms of negotiation, where emotional, cognitive, and perspective-taking processes converge.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信