探讨内镜下粘膜下解剖胃肠道病变的不同技术:文献综述。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Giulio Calabrese, Marcello Maida, Darshan Parekh, Yohei Minato, Alessandro Vitello, Alberto Murino, Rui Morais, Emanuele Sinagra, Daryl Ramai, Ken Ohata, Sandro Sferrazza
{"title":"探讨内镜下粘膜下解剖胃肠道病变的不同技术:文献综述。","authors":"Giulio Calabrese, Marcello Maida, Darshan Parekh, Yohei Minato, Alessandro Vitello, Alberto Murino, Rui Morais, Emanuele Sinagra, Daryl Ramai, Ken Ohata, Sandro Sferrazza","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2504472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has revolutionized the management of early gastrointestinal (GI) neoplasms by enabling en bloc resection with high R0 rates. Several modifications of conventional ESD (C-ESD) have been introduced, including pocket-creation (PCM-ESD), tunnel (T-ESD), traction-assisted (TA-ESD), and saline immersion therapeutic endoscopy (SITE-ESD) methods.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across main databases through February 2025 using keywords related to ESD, with studies selected based on their relevance. While no single technique has demonstrated superior efficacy and safety across different GI regions, a tailored and integrative approach to different techniques could enhance effectiveness. PCM-ESD and T-ESD are particularly advantageous circumferential lesions in the esophagus and rectum, whereas TA-ESD significantly reduces procedure time, particularly in colonic lesions. Moreover, PCM-ESD has demonstrated higher effectiveness for colorectal lesions compared to C-ESD. SITE-ESD has shown benefits in colorectal resections by improving trimming, submucosal space visualization and coagulation control.Advanced traction systems and resection tools has optimized ESD performance. However, selecting the most appropriate approach requires careful consideration of lesion characteristics (particularly fibrosis and location).</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>While conventional ESD remains the foundation, TA and SITE are expected to become the preferred approach in select GI regions during the following years.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring different techniques for endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastrointestinal lesions: a review of the literature.\",\"authors\":\"Giulio Calabrese, Marcello Maida, Darshan Parekh, Yohei Minato, Alessandro Vitello, Alberto Murino, Rui Morais, Emanuele Sinagra, Daryl Ramai, Ken Ohata, Sandro Sferrazza\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737140.2025.2504472\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has revolutionized the management of early gastrointestinal (GI) neoplasms by enabling en bloc resection with high R0 rates. Several modifications of conventional ESD (C-ESD) have been introduced, including pocket-creation (PCM-ESD), tunnel (T-ESD), traction-assisted (TA-ESD), and saline immersion therapeutic endoscopy (SITE-ESD) methods.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across main databases through February 2025 using keywords related to ESD, with studies selected based on their relevance. While no single technique has demonstrated superior efficacy and safety across different GI regions, a tailored and integrative approach to different techniques could enhance effectiveness. PCM-ESD and T-ESD are particularly advantageous circumferential lesions in the esophagus and rectum, whereas TA-ESD significantly reduces procedure time, particularly in colonic lesions. Moreover, PCM-ESD has demonstrated higher effectiveness for colorectal lesions compared to C-ESD. SITE-ESD has shown benefits in colorectal resections by improving trimming, submucosal space visualization and coagulation control.Advanced traction systems and resection tools has optimized ESD performance. However, selecting the most appropriate approach requires careful consideration of lesion characteristics (particularly fibrosis and location).</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>While conventional ESD remains the foundation, TA and SITE are expected to become the preferred approach in select GI regions during the following years.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2025.2504472\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2025.2504472","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

内镜下粘膜剥离术(ESD)通过实现高R0率的整体切除,彻底改变了早期胃肠道(GI)肿瘤的治疗。介绍了几种对传统内镜内镜(C-ESD)的改进,包括口袋创建(PCM-ESD)、隧道(T-ESD)、牵引辅助(TA-ESD)和盐水浸泡治疗性内镜(SITE-ESD)方法。涵盖领域:到2025年2月,我们使用与可持续发展教育相关的关键词在主要数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,并根据其相关性选择了研究。虽然没有一种技术在不同的胃肠道区域显示出优越的疗效和安全性,但针对不同技术的量身定制和综合方法可以提高有效性。PCM-ESD和T-ESD对食管和直肠的周性病变特别有利,而TA-ESD可显著缩短手术时间,尤其是结肠性病变。此外,与C-ESD相比,PCM-ESD对结直肠病变的治疗效果更高。SITE-ESD在结肠直肠切除术中表现出改善切边、粘膜下空间可视化和凝血控制的益处。先进的牵引系统和切除工具优化了ESD性能。然而,选择最合适的入路需要仔细考虑病变特征(特别是纤维化和部位)。专家意见:虽然传统的ESD仍然是基础,但在接下来的几年里,TA和SITE有望成为特定地理区域的首选方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring different techniques for endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastrointestinal lesions: a review of the literature.

Introduction: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has revolutionized the management of early gastrointestinal (GI) neoplasms by enabling en bloc resection with high R0 rates. Several modifications of conventional ESD (C-ESD) have been introduced, including pocket-creation (PCM-ESD), tunnel (T-ESD), traction-assisted (TA-ESD), and saline immersion therapeutic endoscopy (SITE-ESD) methods.

Areas covered: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across main databases through February 2025 using keywords related to ESD, with studies selected based on their relevance. While no single technique has demonstrated superior efficacy and safety across different GI regions, a tailored and integrative approach to different techniques could enhance effectiveness. PCM-ESD and T-ESD are particularly advantageous circumferential lesions in the esophagus and rectum, whereas TA-ESD significantly reduces procedure time, particularly in colonic lesions. Moreover, PCM-ESD has demonstrated higher effectiveness for colorectal lesions compared to C-ESD. SITE-ESD has shown benefits in colorectal resections by improving trimming, submucosal space visualization and coagulation control.Advanced traction systems and resection tools has optimized ESD performance. However, selecting the most appropriate approach requires careful consideration of lesion characteristics (particularly fibrosis and location).

Expert opinion: While conventional ESD remains the foundation, TA and SITE are expected to become the preferred approach in select GI regions during the following years.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches. Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care. Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信