保留上皮的吻合口狭窄切开术是改善结直肠术后良性吻合口狭窄的有效方法。

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2025-05-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2592-3133
Xiaoling Hong, Dezheng Lin, Dejun Fan, Xutao Lin, Junguo Chen, Jiancong Hu
{"title":"保留上皮的吻合口狭窄切开术是改善结直肠术后良性吻合口狭窄的有效方法。","authors":"Xiaoling Hong, Dezheng Lin, Dejun Fan, Xutao Lin, Junguo Chen, Jiancong Hu","doi":"10.1055/a-2592-3133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>We analyzed a large sample of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) treated with endoscopic stricturotomy (ESt) for postoperative benign anastomotic stricture (POBAS) and explored risk factors for stricture recurrence (restricture). We aimed to provide data on the long-term outcomes of ESt and support for optimizing ESt in treating and preventing POBAS recurrence.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 152 consecutive patients with CRC diagnosed with POBAS and treated by ESt at our center from April 2013 to April 2023. The primary outcome was stricture recurrence. Secondary outcomes were the technical success rate, postoperative adverse events (AEs), and restricture-free survival (RFS). Risk factors for stricture recurrence were explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 152 patients, 94.1% (143/152) achieved technical success after the first ESt. Twenty-two patients (17.5%) were diagnosed with recurrent stricture among 126 initial successful patients with follow-up. Anastomotic stricture length ≥ 1 cm and non-preservation of intestinal epithelium during ESt were independent risk factors for recurrence ( <i>P</i> < 0.05). The cumulative RFS rate was 82.53%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Anastomotic stricture length ≥ 1 cm and non-epithelium preservatoin at ESt were independent risk factors for restricture after ESt in POBAS patients. These two factors may help predict risk of POBAS recurrence and provide reliable evidence for developing personalized treatment plans for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"13 ","pages":"a25923133"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12090975/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epithelium-preserving stricturotomy is effective for improving postoperative benign anastomotic stricture associated with colorectal surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoling Hong, Dezheng Lin, Dejun Fan, Xutao Lin, Junguo Chen, Jiancong Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2592-3133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>We analyzed a large sample of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) treated with endoscopic stricturotomy (ESt) for postoperative benign anastomotic stricture (POBAS) and explored risk factors for stricture recurrence (restricture). We aimed to provide data on the long-term outcomes of ESt and support for optimizing ESt in treating and preventing POBAS recurrence.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 152 consecutive patients with CRC diagnosed with POBAS and treated by ESt at our center from April 2013 to April 2023. The primary outcome was stricture recurrence. Secondary outcomes were the technical success rate, postoperative adverse events (AEs), and restricture-free survival (RFS). Risk factors for stricture recurrence were explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 152 patients, 94.1% (143/152) achieved technical success after the first ESt. Twenty-two patients (17.5%) were diagnosed with recurrent stricture among 126 initial successful patients with follow-up. Anastomotic stricture length ≥ 1 cm and non-preservation of intestinal epithelium during ESt were independent risk factors for recurrence ( <i>P</i> < 0.05). The cumulative RFS rate was 82.53%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Anastomotic stricture length ≥ 1 cm and non-epithelium preservatoin at ESt were independent risk factors for restricture after ESt in POBAS patients. These two factors may help predict risk of POBAS recurrence and provide reliable evidence for developing personalized treatment plans for patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"a25923133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12090975/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2592-3133\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2592-3133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和研究目的:我们分析了大样本的内镜下狭窄切开术(ESt)治疗结肠直肠癌(CRC)术后良性吻合口狭窄(POBAS)的患者,并探讨狭窄复发(限制)的危险因素。我们的目的是提供ESt的长期结果数据,并支持优化ESt治疗和预防POBAS复发。患者和方法:本回顾性研究纳入2013年4月至2023年4月在我中心诊断为POBAS并接受ESt治疗的连续152例结直肠癌患者。主要结局为狭窄复发。次要结局是技术成功率、术后不良事件(ae)和无限制生存(RFS)。探讨狭窄复发的危险因素。结果:152例患者首次ESt后技术成功率为94.1%(143/152),随访126例首次成功患者中22例(17.5%)诊断为复发性狭窄。吻合口狭窄长度≥1 cm和肠上皮未保存是肠上皮复发的独立危险因素(P < 0.05)。累计RFS率为82.53%。结论:吻合口狭窄长度≥1cm和ESt时无上皮保存是POBAS患者ESt后狭窄的独立危险因素。这两个因素可能有助于预测POBAS复发的风险,为患者制定个性化的治疗方案提供可靠的依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Epithelium-preserving stricturotomy is effective for improving postoperative benign anastomotic stricture associated with colorectal surgery.

Background and study aims: We analyzed a large sample of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) treated with endoscopic stricturotomy (ESt) for postoperative benign anastomotic stricture (POBAS) and explored risk factors for stricture recurrence (restricture). We aimed to provide data on the long-term outcomes of ESt and support for optimizing ESt in treating and preventing POBAS recurrence.

Patients and methods: This retrospective study included 152 consecutive patients with CRC diagnosed with POBAS and treated by ESt at our center from April 2013 to April 2023. The primary outcome was stricture recurrence. Secondary outcomes were the technical success rate, postoperative adverse events (AEs), and restricture-free survival (RFS). Risk factors for stricture recurrence were explored.

Results: Of the 152 patients, 94.1% (143/152) achieved technical success after the first ESt. Twenty-two patients (17.5%) were diagnosed with recurrent stricture among 126 initial successful patients with follow-up. Anastomotic stricture length ≥ 1 cm and non-preservation of intestinal epithelium during ESt were independent risk factors for recurrence ( P < 0.05). The cumulative RFS rate was 82.53%.

Conclusions: Anastomotic stricture length ≥ 1 cm and non-epithelium preservatoin at ESt were independent risk factors for restricture after ESt in POBAS patients. These two factors may help predict risk of POBAS recurrence and provide reliable evidence for developing personalized treatment plans for patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信