数字排斥和无家可归者:对阿片类药物使用障碍护理的影响。

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Current Opinion in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-05 DOI:10.1097/YCO.0000000000001012
Joseph Tay Wee Teck, Hui Shan Tan, Alexander Baldacchino
{"title":"数字排斥和无家可归者:对阿片类药物使用障碍护理的影响。","authors":"Joseph Tay Wee Teck, Hui Shan Tan, Alexander Baldacchino","doi":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000001012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>People experiencing homelessness (PEH) are at increased risk of adverse consequences from opioid use disorder and other health conditions yet face multiple structural and personal barriers to accessing care. The expansion of digitized health and social care services may have improved access and efficiency of services to many in the general population but at the cost of further marginalizing PEH. Current digital exclusion mitigation strategies may not be sufficiently nuanced to address the deeply complex and challenging circumstances of PEH lives.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Providing devices, data and skills to PEH is no guarantee of increased use and benefit from digitally enabled services. Precarious and constantly mobile lives mean that maintaining sustained digital access is problematic and not always desirable. Even where digital access is secured, PEH are constrained in the range of activities they can engage with online due to privacy and other structural constraints. Justifiable distrust of institutions including healthcare colors the acceptability of digitized services for PEH. This distrust is magnified due to new inequities and vulnerabilities introduced by digitized services including the need for a digital persona, adverse outcomes from adverse digital inclusion and a widening of power imbalances. These more nuanced understandings of digital exclusion are increasingly incorporated into mitigation strategies, premised on co-production and engagement with PEH.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Improved engagement with digitally enabled OUD care for PEH must be prefaced by improved access to technology, optimized physical environments to maintain and use technology, and collaborative cross-sectoral efforts to build trust and engage this group through co-production and rebalanced power dynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":11022,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"274-281"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital exclusion and people experiencing homelessness: implications for opioid use disorder care.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Tay Wee Teck, Hui Shan Tan, Alexander Baldacchino\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/YCO.0000000000001012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>People experiencing homelessness (PEH) are at increased risk of adverse consequences from opioid use disorder and other health conditions yet face multiple structural and personal barriers to accessing care. The expansion of digitized health and social care services may have improved access and efficiency of services to many in the general population but at the cost of further marginalizing PEH. Current digital exclusion mitigation strategies may not be sufficiently nuanced to address the deeply complex and challenging circumstances of PEH lives.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Providing devices, data and skills to PEH is no guarantee of increased use and benefit from digitally enabled services. Precarious and constantly mobile lives mean that maintaining sustained digital access is problematic and not always desirable. Even where digital access is secured, PEH are constrained in the range of activities they can engage with online due to privacy and other structural constraints. Justifiable distrust of institutions including healthcare colors the acceptability of digitized services for PEH. This distrust is magnified due to new inequities and vulnerabilities introduced by digitized services including the need for a digital persona, adverse outcomes from adverse digital inclusion and a widening of power imbalances. These more nuanced understandings of digital exclusion are increasingly incorporated into mitigation strategies, premised on co-production and engagement with PEH.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Improved engagement with digitally enabled OUD care for PEH must be prefaced by improved access to technology, optimized physical environments to maintain and use technology, and collaborative cross-sectoral efforts to build trust and engage this group through co-production and rebalanced power dynamics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"274-281\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000001012\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000001012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

审查目的:无家可归者因阿片类药物使用障碍和其他健康状况而产生不良后果的风险增加,但在获得护理方面面临多重结构性和个人障碍。数字化卫生和社会保健服务的扩大可能改善了一般人群中许多人获得服务的机会和效率,但代价是进一步边缘化PEH。目前的数字排斥缓解战略可能不足以解决PEH生活中极其复杂和具有挑战性的环境。最近的研究发现:向PEH提供设备、数据和技能并不能保证增加使用并从数字化服务中获益。不稳定和不断移动的生活意味着维持持续的数字访问是有问题的,而且并不总是可取的。即使在数字访问安全的情况下,由于隐私和其他结构性限制,PEH可以参与的在线活动范围也受到限制。对包括医疗保健在内的机构的合理不信任影响了PEH数字化服务的可接受性。由于数字化服务带来的新的不平等和脆弱性,包括对数字角色的需求,不利的数字包容的不利后果以及权力不平衡的扩大,这种不信任被放大了。这些对数字排斥的更细微的理解越来越多地纳入缓解战略,其前提是共同制作和与PEH的接触。摘要:改善对PEH的数字化OUD护理的参与,必须首先改善技术的可及性,优化物理环境以维护和使用技术,并通过合作生产和重新平衡权力动态,通过跨部门合作努力建立信任并吸引这一群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digital exclusion and people experiencing homelessness: implications for opioid use disorder care.

Purpose of review: People experiencing homelessness (PEH) are at increased risk of adverse consequences from opioid use disorder and other health conditions yet face multiple structural and personal barriers to accessing care. The expansion of digitized health and social care services may have improved access and efficiency of services to many in the general population but at the cost of further marginalizing PEH. Current digital exclusion mitigation strategies may not be sufficiently nuanced to address the deeply complex and challenging circumstances of PEH lives.

Recent findings: Providing devices, data and skills to PEH is no guarantee of increased use and benefit from digitally enabled services. Precarious and constantly mobile lives mean that maintaining sustained digital access is problematic and not always desirable. Even where digital access is secured, PEH are constrained in the range of activities they can engage with online due to privacy and other structural constraints. Justifiable distrust of institutions including healthcare colors the acceptability of digitized services for PEH. This distrust is magnified due to new inequities and vulnerabilities introduced by digitized services including the need for a digital persona, adverse outcomes from adverse digital inclusion and a widening of power imbalances. These more nuanced understandings of digital exclusion are increasingly incorporated into mitigation strategies, premised on co-production and engagement with PEH.

Summary: Improved engagement with digitally enabled OUD care for PEH must be prefaced by improved access to technology, optimized physical environments to maintain and use technology, and collaborative cross-sectoral efforts to build trust and engage this group through co-production and rebalanced power dynamics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Psychiatry
Current Opinion in Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.40%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Psychiatry is an easy-to-digest bimonthly journal covering the most interesting and important advances in the field of psychiatry. Eight sections on mental health disorders including schizophrenia, neurodevelopmental disorders and eating disorders, are presented alongside five area-specific sections, offering an expert evaluation on the most exciting developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信