乳腺癌患者对数字社会护理平台的偏好。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Sima Rafiei, Peigham Heidarpoor, Saber Souri, Zahra Nejatifar, Mohammad Amerzadeh
{"title":"乳腺癌患者对数字社会护理平台的偏好。","authors":"Sima Rafiei, Peigham Heidarpoor, Saber Souri, Zahra Nejatifar, Mohammad Amerzadeh","doi":"10.1186/s12905-025-03792-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer is a multifaceted condition affecting women globally, with patients often facing emotional, psychological, and social challenges. This study explored breast cancer patients' preferences for features of a digital social care platform.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study using Conjoint Analysis (CA), grounded in economic utility theory, was conducted. A Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) questionnaire was administered to 158 breast cancer patients at a university hospital in Iran between November 2023 and January 2024. Data were analysed using ordered logistic regression in Stata 13.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All platform attributes significantly influenced preferences (P ≤ 0.05). Emotional support had the highest impact (β = 1.132), followed by informational (β = 0.973) and esteem support (β = 0.864). Instructional videos increased the likelihood of choosing a digital platform 2.45 times compared to text-based messages (P < 0.001). Personalized online support was 1.42 times more preferred than generic supportive messages (P < 0.001). Mindfulness affirmations were 1.14 times more preferred than inspirational messages (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Digital tools that prioritize emotional, informational, and esteem support-especially through personalized online support and instructional videos can improve patient engagement and acceptability. These findings support the patient-centred design of digital social care platforms to enhance quality of life for breast cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9204,"journal":{"name":"BMC Women's Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"240"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12093778/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The preferences of breast cancer patients regarding a digital social care platform.\",\"authors\":\"Sima Rafiei, Peigham Heidarpoor, Saber Souri, Zahra Nejatifar, Mohammad Amerzadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12905-025-03792-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer is a multifaceted condition affecting women globally, with patients often facing emotional, psychological, and social challenges. This study explored breast cancer patients' preferences for features of a digital social care platform.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study using Conjoint Analysis (CA), grounded in economic utility theory, was conducted. A Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) questionnaire was administered to 158 breast cancer patients at a university hospital in Iran between November 2023 and January 2024. Data were analysed using ordered logistic regression in Stata 13.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All platform attributes significantly influenced preferences (P ≤ 0.05). Emotional support had the highest impact (β = 1.132), followed by informational (β = 0.973) and esteem support (β = 0.864). Instructional videos increased the likelihood of choosing a digital platform 2.45 times compared to text-based messages (P < 0.001). Personalized online support was 1.42 times more preferred than generic supportive messages (P < 0.001). Mindfulness affirmations were 1.14 times more preferred than inspirational messages (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Digital tools that prioritize emotional, informational, and esteem support-especially through personalized online support and instructional videos can improve patient engagement and acceptability. These findings support the patient-centred design of digital social care platforms to enhance quality of life for breast cancer patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Women's Health\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12093778/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Women's Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03792-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Women's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-025-03792-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:乳腺癌是一种影响全球女性的多方面疾病,患者经常面临情感、心理和社会挑战。本研究探讨了乳腺癌患者对数字社会护理平台功能的偏好。方法:以经济效用理论为基础,采用联合分析(CA)进行横断面研究。在2023年11月至2024年1月期间,对伊朗一家大学医院的158名乳腺癌患者进行了离散选择实验(DCE)问卷调查。在Stata 13中使用有序逻辑回归分析数据。结果:各平台属性对用户偏好有显著影响(P≤0.05)。情感支持的影响最大(β = 1.132),其次是信息支持(β = 0.973)和自尊支持(β = 0.864)。与基于文本的信息相比,教学视频增加了选择数字平台的可能性2.45倍(P结论:优先考虑情感,信息和尊重支持的数字工具-特别是通过个性化的在线支持和教学视频可以提高患者的参与度和可接受性。这些发现支持以患者为中心的数字社会护理平台设计,以提高乳腺癌患者的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The preferences of breast cancer patients regarding a digital social care platform.

Background: Breast cancer is a multifaceted condition affecting women globally, with patients often facing emotional, psychological, and social challenges. This study explored breast cancer patients' preferences for features of a digital social care platform.

Methods: A cross-sectional study using Conjoint Analysis (CA), grounded in economic utility theory, was conducted. A Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) questionnaire was administered to 158 breast cancer patients at a university hospital in Iran between November 2023 and January 2024. Data were analysed using ordered logistic regression in Stata 13.

Results: All platform attributes significantly influenced preferences (P ≤ 0.05). Emotional support had the highest impact (β = 1.132), followed by informational (β = 0.973) and esteem support (β = 0.864). Instructional videos increased the likelihood of choosing a digital platform 2.45 times compared to text-based messages (P < 0.001). Personalized online support was 1.42 times more preferred than generic supportive messages (P < 0.001). Mindfulness affirmations were 1.14 times more preferred than inspirational messages (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Digital tools that prioritize emotional, informational, and esteem support-especially through personalized online support and instructional videos can improve patient engagement and acceptability. These findings support the patient-centred design of digital social care platforms to enhance quality of life for breast cancer patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Women's Health
BMC Women's Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
444
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Women''s Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the health and wellbeing of adolescent girls and women, with a particular focus on the physical, mental, and emotional health of women in developed and developing nations. The journal welcomes submissions on women''s public health issues, health behaviours, breast cancer, gynecological diseases, mental health and health promotion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信