治疗调整对克罗恩病患者术后吻合口病变内镜预后的影响。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Linlin Yin, Chenliang Ding, Yi Li, Lei Cao, Hongfei Tu, Yue Zhu, Luxuan Tan, Bin Zhang, Jianfeng Gong
{"title":"治疗调整对克罗恩病患者术后吻合口病变内镜预后的影响。","authors":"Linlin Yin, Chenliang Ding, Yi Li, Lei Cao, Hongfei Tu, Yue Zhu, Luxuan Tan, Bin Zhang, Jianfeng Gong","doi":"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anastomotic ulcers are common after ileocolonic resection in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). However, the endoscopic prognosis of isolated anastomotic lesions after treatment adjustment remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively included CD patients with anastomotic lesions who were referred to our center for ileocolonoscopy between 2020 and 2024. We conducted an initial evaluation of the impact of treatment adjustment on the endoscopic prognosis of anastomotic lesions. Additionally, we analyzed the association between different adjustment strategies and endoscopic outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 199 eligible CD patients with anastomotic lesions were included in our study. Treatment adjustment promoted mucosal healing (multivariable Cox HR: 2.376, 1.400-4.032, p=0.001) and endoscopic improvement (multivariable Cox HR: 2.373, 1.596-3.530, p<0.001). We also found that the endoscopic ulcer improvement of biologics to biologics switching was superior to that of non-treatment adjustment (Cox HR: 2.055, 1.212-3.482, p=0.007). Cox regression analyses further confirmed that non-biologics to biologics switching was associated with better endoscopic mucosal healing(Cox HR: 2.751, 1.494-5.063, p=0.001) and ulcer improvement(Cox HR: 2.154, 1.322-3.509, p=0.002). Regarding patients with insufficient trough levels of biologics, biologic optimization significantly improved endoscopic mucosal healing (Cox HR: 2.854, 1.345-6.053, p=0.006) and endoscopic ulcer improvement (Cox HR: 2.344, 1.288-4.265, p=0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatment adjustment contributed to the improvement of endoscopic prognosis in anastomotic lesions patients. Different adjustment strategies (biologics to biologics switching, non-biologics to biologics switching, biologic optimization) similarly resulted in better endoscopic outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":10278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of treatment adjustment on the endoscopic prognosis of postoperative anastomotic lesions in patients with Crohn's disease.\",\"authors\":\"Linlin Yin, Chenliang Ding, Yi Li, Lei Cao, Hongfei Tu, Yue Zhu, Luxuan Tan, Bin Zhang, Jianfeng Gong\",\"doi\":\"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000859\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anastomotic ulcers are common after ileocolonic resection in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). However, the endoscopic prognosis of isolated anastomotic lesions after treatment adjustment remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively included CD patients with anastomotic lesions who were referred to our center for ileocolonoscopy between 2020 and 2024. We conducted an initial evaluation of the impact of treatment adjustment on the endoscopic prognosis of anastomotic lesions. Additionally, we analyzed the association between different adjustment strategies and endoscopic outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 199 eligible CD patients with anastomotic lesions were included in our study. Treatment adjustment promoted mucosal healing (multivariable Cox HR: 2.376, 1.400-4.032, p=0.001) and endoscopic improvement (multivariable Cox HR: 2.373, 1.596-3.530, p<0.001). We also found that the endoscopic ulcer improvement of biologics to biologics switching was superior to that of non-treatment adjustment (Cox HR: 2.055, 1.212-3.482, p=0.007). Cox regression analyses further confirmed that non-biologics to biologics switching was associated with better endoscopic mucosal healing(Cox HR: 2.751, 1.494-5.063, p=0.001) and ulcer improvement(Cox HR: 2.154, 1.322-3.509, p=0.002). Regarding patients with insufficient trough levels of biologics, biologic optimization significantly improved endoscopic mucosal healing (Cox HR: 2.854, 1.345-6.053, p=0.006) and endoscopic ulcer improvement (Cox HR: 2.344, 1.288-4.265, p=0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Treatment adjustment contributed to the improvement of endoscopic prognosis in anastomotic lesions patients. Different adjustment strategies (biologics to biologics switching, non-biologics to biologics switching, biologic optimization) similarly resulted in better endoscopic outcome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000859\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000859","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:克罗恩病(CD)患者回肠结肠切除术后吻合口溃疡很常见。然而,孤立性吻合口病变治疗调整后的内镜预后尚不清楚。方法:我们回顾性地纳入了2020年至2024年间到我们中心进行回肠结肠镜检查的吻合口病变的CD患者。我们对治疗调整对吻合口病变内镜预后的影响进行了初步评估。此外,我们分析了不同调整策略与内镜结果之间的关系。结果:我们共纳入199例吻合口病变的符合条件的CD患者。治疗调整促进了粘膜愈合(多变量Cox HR: 2.376, 1.400-4.032, p=0.001)和内镜改善(多变量Cox HR: 2.373, 1.596-3.530, p)。结论:治疗调整有助于改善吻合口病变患者的内镜预后。不同的调整策略(生物制剂到生物制剂的切换,非生物制剂到生物制剂的切换,生物制剂的优化)同样导致更好的内镜结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of treatment adjustment on the endoscopic prognosis of postoperative anastomotic lesions in patients with Crohn's disease.

Background: Anastomotic ulcers are common after ileocolonic resection in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). However, the endoscopic prognosis of isolated anastomotic lesions after treatment adjustment remains unclear.

Methods: We retrospectively included CD patients with anastomotic lesions who were referred to our center for ileocolonoscopy between 2020 and 2024. We conducted an initial evaluation of the impact of treatment adjustment on the endoscopic prognosis of anastomotic lesions. Additionally, we analyzed the association between different adjustment strategies and endoscopic outcome.

Results: In total, 199 eligible CD patients with anastomotic lesions were included in our study. Treatment adjustment promoted mucosal healing (multivariable Cox HR: 2.376, 1.400-4.032, p=0.001) and endoscopic improvement (multivariable Cox HR: 2.373, 1.596-3.530, p<0.001). We also found that the endoscopic ulcer improvement of biologics to biologics switching was superior to that of non-treatment adjustment (Cox HR: 2.055, 1.212-3.482, p=0.007). Cox regression analyses further confirmed that non-biologics to biologics switching was associated with better endoscopic mucosal healing(Cox HR: 2.751, 1.494-5.063, p=0.001) and ulcer improvement(Cox HR: 2.154, 1.322-3.509, p=0.002). Regarding patients with insufficient trough levels of biologics, biologic optimization significantly improved endoscopic mucosal healing (Cox HR: 2.854, 1.345-6.053, p=0.006) and endoscopic ulcer improvement (Cox HR: 2.344, 1.288-4.265, p=0.005).

Conclusions: Treatment adjustment contributed to the improvement of endoscopic prognosis in anastomotic lesions patients. Different adjustment strategies (biologics to biologics switching, non-biologics to biologics switching, biologic optimization) similarly resulted in better endoscopic outcome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology (CTG), published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), is a peer-reviewed open access online journal dedicated to innovative clinical work in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. CTG hopes to fulfill an unmet need for clinicians and scientists by welcoming novel cohort studies, early-phase clinical trials, qualitative and quantitative epidemiologic research, hypothesis-generating research, studies of novel mechanisms and methodologies including public health interventions, and integration of approaches across organs and disciplines. CTG also welcomes hypothesis-generating small studies, methods papers, and translational research with clear applications to human physiology or disease. Colon and small bowel Endoscopy and novel diagnostics Esophagus Functional GI disorders Immunology of the GI tract Microbiology of the GI tract Inflammatory bowel disease Pancreas and biliary tract Liver Pathology Pediatrics Preventative medicine Nutrition/obesity Stomach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信