{"title":"外阴癌切除距离对复发影响的回顾性分析。","authors":"Jan-Philipp Cieslik, Annika Sophia Beerbaum, Tanja Fehm, Monika Hampl","doi":"10.1007/s00404-025-08046-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluates the effect of resection margin distance on disease-free survival (DFS) and (local) recurrence rates in patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) while assessing the impact of associated factors such as lichen sclerosus (LS) and lymph node metastasis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective single-center analysis was conducted on 150 patients treated for vulvar SCC between 2004 and 2014 at University Hospital Düsseldorf. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of clinical and pathological factors on DFS. Additionally, a literature review was conducted to summarize existing evidence on resection margins.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings suggest that a resection margin exceeding 8 mm does not significantly improve DFS (HR 1.14, CI 1.01-1.28, p = 0.029). LS was significantly associated with recurrence (HR 2.36, CI 1.13-4.91, p = 0.02) and reduced DFS. Univariate analysis identified lymph node metastasis as a significant predictor of DFS; however, this association was not retained in multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although current guidelines advocate for resection margins >8 mm, our findings suggest that smaller margins may be acceptable in selected patients, particularly those without LS and tumors located near critical structures (e.g., the anus, clitoris, or urethra). These considerations should inform personalized treatment strategies and follow-up care.</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of resection distance on vulvar cancer relapse: a retrospective analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jan-Philipp Cieslik, Annika Sophia Beerbaum, Tanja Fehm, Monika Hampl\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00404-025-08046-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluates the effect of resection margin distance on disease-free survival (DFS) and (local) recurrence rates in patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) while assessing the impact of associated factors such as lichen sclerosus (LS) and lymph node metastasis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective single-center analysis was conducted on 150 patients treated for vulvar SCC between 2004 and 2014 at University Hospital Düsseldorf. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of clinical and pathological factors on DFS. Additionally, a literature review was conducted to summarize existing evidence on resection margins.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings suggest that a resection margin exceeding 8 mm does not significantly improve DFS (HR 1.14, CI 1.01-1.28, p = 0.029). LS was significantly associated with recurrence (HR 2.36, CI 1.13-4.91, p = 0.02) and reduced DFS. Univariate analysis identified lymph node metastasis as a significant predictor of DFS; however, this association was not retained in multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although current guidelines advocate for resection margins >8 mm, our findings suggest that smaller margins may be acceptable in selected patients, particularly those without LS and tumors located near critical structures (e.g., the anus, clitoris, or urethra). These considerations should inform personalized treatment strategies and follow-up care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-025-08046-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-025-08046-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨外阴鳞状细胞癌(SCC)切除切缘距离对患者无病生存(DFS)和(局部)复发率的影响,同时评估相关因素如硬化地衣(LS)和淋巴结转移的影响。方法:对2004 - 2014年在德国塞尔多夫大学医院接受外阴SCC治疗的150例患者进行回顾性单中心分析。采用单因素和多因素回归分析评价临床和病理因素对DFS的影响。此外,我们还进行了文献综述,以总结切除边缘的现有证据。结果:研究结果表明切除切缘超过8 mm并不能显著改善DFS (HR 1.14, CI 1.01-1.28, p = 0.029)。LS与复发率(HR 2.36, CI 1.13-4.91, p = 0.02)和DFS降低显著相关。单因素分析发现淋巴结转移是DFS的重要预测因素;然而,这种关联在多变量分析中没有保留。结论:虽然目前的指南提倡切除切缘bbb80mm,但我们的研究结果表明,较小的切缘在特定的患者中是可以接受的,特别是那些没有LS和肿瘤位于关键结构附近的患者(如肛门、阴蒂或尿道)。这些考虑应告知个性化的治疗策略和后续护理。
Influence of resection distance on vulvar cancer relapse: a retrospective analysis.
Objective: This study evaluates the effect of resection margin distance on disease-free survival (DFS) and (local) recurrence rates in patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) while assessing the impact of associated factors such as lichen sclerosus (LS) and lymph node metastasis.
Methods: A retrospective single-center analysis was conducted on 150 patients treated for vulvar SCC between 2004 and 2014 at University Hospital Düsseldorf. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of clinical and pathological factors on DFS. Additionally, a literature review was conducted to summarize existing evidence on resection margins.
Results: The findings suggest that a resection margin exceeding 8 mm does not significantly improve DFS (HR 1.14, CI 1.01-1.28, p = 0.029). LS was significantly associated with recurrence (HR 2.36, CI 1.13-4.91, p = 0.02) and reduced DFS. Univariate analysis identified lymph node metastasis as a significant predictor of DFS; however, this association was not retained in multivariate analysis.
Conclusion: Although current guidelines advocate for resection margins >8 mm, our findings suggest that smaller margins may be acceptable in selected patients, particularly those without LS and tumors located near critical structures (e.g., the anus, clitoris, or urethra). These considerations should inform personalized treatment strategies and follow-up care.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report".
The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.