高多孔性与羟基磷灰石涂层多孔性表面在同一杯子系统中的中期比较:一项回顾性单中心研究。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Tetsuya Tachibana, Hiroki Katagiri, Kazumasa Miyatake, Takahisa Ogawa, Masanobu Hirao, Ryohei Takada, Ryusuke Saito, Tetsuya Jinno
{"title":"高多孔性与羟基磷灰石涂层多孔性表面在同一杯子系统中的中期比较:一项回顾性单中心研究。","authors":"Tetsuya Tachibana, Hiroki Katagiri, Kazumasa Miyatake, Takahisa Ogawa, Masanobu Hirao, Ryohei Takada, Ryusuke Saito, Tetsuya Jinno","doi":"10.1186/s12891-025-08753-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this study, we aimed to compare the mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of highly porous and hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated porous titanium cups using the same cementless cup system in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). We investigated the differences in radiolucent line (RLL) formation, cup migration, and clinical outcomes between the two surface processing methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 209 hips (116 in the highly porous group and 93 in the HA porous group) with a minimum follow-up period of over 4 years. Using standardized anteroposterior pelvic radiographs, we conducted radiographic evaluations to assess cup orientation, initial gaps, and RLLs. Migration was analyzed using Einzel-Bild-Rontgen Analysis (EBRA), focusing on a subset of 28 randomly selected cups from each group as determined by power analysis. Clinical outcomes were measured using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) hip score. The primary outcome was the incidence of cup revision, and the secondary outcomes were postoperative JOA scores and the incidence of initial gaps and RLLs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No cup revisions were made in either group. Both groups had significant postoperative improvements in the JOA scores, with no differences observed during the follow-up period. At baseline, the initial gaps were observed at similar rates (highly porous vs. HA porous [51% vs. 52%]; p = 0.97). However, at the 5-year follow-up, the initial gaps were resolved in nearly all cases. In the highly porous group, RLLs were significantly more frequent during the first-year follow-up (23% vs. 2%; p < 0.0001). However, they decreased in all cases, and none of them exhibited RLL expansion. EBRA migration analysis revealed no significant differences between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both groups demonstrated comparable mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes. The highly porous group exhibited higher initial RLL incidences. However, RLL diminished over time without compromising the migration or clinical results. Both designs are reliable options for cementless THA.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":"500"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12090497/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mid-term comparison of highly porous versus hydroxyapatite-coated porous surface in the same cup system: a retrospective single-center study.\",\"authors\":\"Tetsuya Tachibana, Hiroki Katagiri, Kazumasa Miyatake, Takahisa Ogawa, Masanobu Hirao, Ryohei Takada, Ryusuke Saito, Tetsuya Jinno\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12891-025-08753-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this study, we aimed to compare the mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of highly porous and hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated porous titanium cups using the same cementless cup system in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). We investigated the differences in radiolucent line (RLL) formation, cup migration, and clinical outcomes between the two surface processing methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 209 hips (116 in the highly porous group and 93 in the HA porous group) with a minimum follow-up period of over 4 years. Using standardized anteroposterior pelvic radiographs, we conducted radiographic evaluations to assess cup orientation, initial gaps, and RLLs. Migration was analyzed using Einzel-Bild-Rontgen Analysis (EBRA), focusing on a subset of 28 randomly selected cups from each group as determined by power analysis. Clinical outcomes were measured using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) hip score. The primary outcome was the incidence of cup revision, and the secondary outcomes were postoperative JOA scores and the incidence of initial gaps and RLLs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No cup revisions were made in either group. Both groups had significant postoperative improvements in the JOA scores, with no differences observed during the follow-up period. At baseline, the initial gaps were observed at similar rates (highly porous vs. HA porous [51% vs. 52%]; p = 0.97). However, at the 5-year follow-up, the initial gaps were resolved in nearly all cases. In the highly porous group, RLLs were significantly more frequent during the first-year follow-up (23% vs. 2%; p < 0.0001). However, they decreased in all cases, and none of them exhibited RLL expansion. EBRA migration analysis revealed no significant differences between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both groups demonstrated comparable mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes. The highly porous group exhibited higher initial RLL incidences. However, RLL diminished over time without compromising the migration or clinical results. Both designs are reliable options for cementless THA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"500\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12090497/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08753-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08753-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在本研究中,我们旨在比较在全髋关节置换术(THA)患者中使用相同的无水泥杯系统使用高多孔和羟基磷灰石(HA)涂层多孔钛杯的中期临床和影像学结果。我们研究了两种表面处理方法在放射光线(RLL)形成、杯状迁移和临床结果方面的差异。方法:本回顾性研究纳入209例髋关节(高孔组116例,HA孔组93例),随访时间超过4年。使用标准化的骨盆正位x线片,我们进行了影像学评估,以评估杯位、初始间隙和rls。使用EBRA (Einzel-Bild-Rontgen Analysis)分析迁移,重点关注从每组随机选择的28个杯子,并通过功率分析确定。临床结果采用日本骨科协会(JOA)髋关节评分进行测量。主要结果是cup翻修的发生率,次要结果是术后JOA评分、初始间隙和rls的发生率。结果:两组均未进行杯型矫正。两组患者术后JOA评分均有显著改善,随访期间无差异。在基线时,观察到的初始间隙率相似(高多孔性vs高通透性[51% vs 52%];p = 0.97)。然而,在5年的随访中,几乎所有病例的初始差距都得到了解决。在高度多孔组中,rls在第一年随访期间明显更频繁(23%比2%;结论:两组的中期临床和影像学结果相当。高孔隙组的初始RLL发生率较高。然而,RLL随着时间的推移而减少,但不影响迁移或临床结果。这两种设计都是无水泥THA的可靠选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mid-term comparison of highly porous versus hydroxyapatite-coated porous surface in the same cup system: a retrospective single-center study.

Background: In this study, we aimed to compare the mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of highly porous and hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated porous titanium cups using the same cementless cup system in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). We investigated the differences in radiolucent line (RLL) formation, cup migration, and clinical outcomes between the two surface processing methods.

Methods: This retrospective study included 209 hips (116 in the highly porous group and 93 in the HA porous group) with a minimum follow-up period of over 4 years. Using standardized anteroposterior pelvic radiographs, we conducted radiographic evaluations to assess cup orientation, initial gaps, and RLLs. Migration was analyzed using Einzel-Bild-Rontgen Analysis (EBRA), focusing on a subset of 28 randomly selected cups from each group as determined by power analysis. Clinical outcomes were measured using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) hip score. The primary outcome was the incidence of cup revision, and the secondary outcomes were postoperative JOA scores and the incidence of initial gaps and RLLs.

Results: No cup revisions were made in either group. Both groups had significant postoperative improvements in the JOA scores, with no differences observed during the follow-up period. At baseline, the initial gaps were observed at similar rates (highly porous vs. HA porous [51% vs. 52%]; p = 0.97). However, at the 5-year follow-up, the initial gaps were resolved in nearly all cases. In the highly porous group, RLLs were significantly more frequent during the first-year follow-up (23% vs. 2%; p < 0.0001). However, they decreased in all cases, and none of them exhibited RLL expansion. EBRA migration analysis revealed no significant differences between the groups.

Conclusion: Both groups demonstrated comparable mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes. The highly porous group exhibited higher initial RLL incidences. However, RLL diminished over time without compromising the migration or clinical results. Both designs are reliable options for cementless THA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信