用SKIN-Q治疗结果量表测量微创美容治疗满意度。

IF 3 2区医学 Q1 SURGERY

Aesthetic Surgery Journal Pub Date : 2025-05-20 DOI:10.1093/asj/sjaf075

Anne F Klassen, Charlene Rae, Lucas Gallo, Stefan Cano, Manraj Kaur, Steven Dayan, Katie Armstrong, Lotte Poulsen, Elena Tsangaris, Katherine B Santosa, Andrea L Pusic

{"title":"用SKIN-Q治疗结果量表测量微创美容治疗满意度。","authors":"Anne F Klassen, Charlene Rae, Lucas Gallo, Stefan Cano, Manraj Kaur, Steven Dayan, Katie Armstrong, Lotte Poulsen, Elena Tsangaris, Katherine B Santosa, Andrea L Pusic","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjaf075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A key outcome in aesthetic treatments is the patient's view of how their skin looks and feels after a treatment.Objectives: To add a Treatment Outcome scale to the SKIN-Q patient-reported outcome measure.Methods: Concept elicitation interviews were performed with patients recruited from clinics in Canada and the USA. Data were coded, analyzed, and used to draft a Treatment Outcome scale. The scale was refined with patient and expert feedback and field tested in an online sample (i.e., Prolific). Rasch measurement and classical test theory psychometric analyses were performed to examine scale reliability and validity.Results: The concept elicitation interviews included 26 participants. The first draft of the Treatment Outcome scale included 32 items that assessed changes in appearance (e.g., look better) and wellbeing (e.g., feel more confident). Items were revised with input from 12 experts, 11 patients, and 174 online participants who had aesthetic face and/or body treatments and provided 180 survey responses, resulting in 36 items. Prolific data were collected from 499 participants who provided 542 assessments. The sample comprised 80.6% women; 78.8% had a facial treatment, 11.4% had a body treatment, and 9.8% had both a facial and body treatment. Data for a final 10-item Treatment Outcome scale fit the Rasch model (Chi-square = 50.46, df=40, p=0.124). The scale evidenced high reliability, with a person separation index and Cronbach alpha values >0.87. A total of 20/22 (91%) pre-defined construct validation hypotheses were accepted. A total of 136 participants completed the Treatment Outcome scale a second time within 7-14 days. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the test-retest was 0.89 (95% CI 0.85, 0.92).Conclusions: This new SKIN-Q scale can be used alongside other patient-centered outcome tools to measure how patients look and feel after minimally invasive aesthetic treatments for the body and/or face.","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Satisfaction With Minimally Invasive Aesthetic Treatments With the SKIN-Q Treatment Outcome Scale.\",\"authors\":\"Anne F Klassen, Charlene Rae, Lucas Gallo, Stefan Cano, Manraj Kaur, Steven Dayan, Katie Armstrong, Lotte Poulsen, Elena Tsangaris, Katherine B Santosa, Andrea L Pusic\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/asj/sjaf075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: A key outcome in aesthetic treatments is the patient's view of how their skin looks and feels after a treatment.Objectives: To add a Treatment Outcome scale to the SKIN-Q patient-reported outcome measure.Methods: Concept elicitation interviews were performed with patients recruited from clinics in Canada and the USA. Data were coded, analyzed, and used to draft a Treatment Outcome scale. The scale was refined with patient and expert feedback and field tested in an online sample (i.e., Prolific). Rasch measurement and classical test theory psychometric analyses were performed to examine scale reliability and validity.Results: The concept elicitation interviews included 26 participants. The first draft of the Treatment Outcome scale included 32 items that assessed changes in appearance (e.g., look better) and wellbeing (e.g., feel more confident). Items were revised with input from 12 experts, 11 patients, and 174 online participants who had aesthetic face and/or body treatments and provided 180 survey responses, resulting in 36 items. Prolific data were collected from 499 participants who provided 542 assessments. The sample comprised 80.6% women; 78.8% had a facial treatment, 11.4% had a body treatment, and 9.8% had both a facial and body treatment. Data for a final 10-item Treatment Outcome scale fit the Rasch model (Chi-square = 50.46, df=40, p=0.124). The scale evidenced high reliability, with a person separation index and Cronbach alpha values >0.87. A total of 20/22 (91%) pre-defined construct validation hypotheses were accepted. A total of 136 participants completed the Treatment Outcome scale a second time within 7-14 days. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the test-retest was 0.89 (95% CI 0.85, 0.92).Conclusions: This new SKIN-Q scale can be used alongside other patient-centered outcome tools to measure how patients look and feel after minimally invasive aesthetic treatments for the body and/or face.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aesthetic Surgery Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aesthetic Surgery Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf075\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf075","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

背景：美容治疗的一个关键结果是患者对治疗后皮肤外观和感觉的看法。目的：在SKIN-Q患者报告的结果测量中增加一个治疗结果量表。方法：从加拿大和美国的诊所招募患者进行概念启发访谈。对数据进行编码、分析并用于起草治疗结果量表。该量表根据患者和专家的反馈进行了改进，并在在线样本（即多产）中进行了现场测试。采用Rasch测量法和经典测试理论进行心理测量分析，检验量表的信度和效度。结果：概念启发访谈共26人。治疗结果量表的初稿包括32个项目，评估外观（例如，看起来更好）和健康（例如，感觉更自信）的变化。根据12名专家、11名患者和174名接受面部和/或身体美容治疗的在线参与者的意见，对项目进行了修改，并提供了180份调查回复，最终得出36个项目。从提供542项评估的499名参与者中收集了大量数据。样本中女性占80.6%；78.8%的人做过面部护理，11.4%的人做过身体护理，9.8%的人做过面部和身体护理。最终10项治疗结果量表的数据符合Rasch模型（卡方= 50.46,df=40, p=0.124）。量表具有较高的信度，人分离指数和Cronbach alpha值为>0.87。共有20/22（91%）预先定义的结构验证假设被接受。共有136名参与者在7-14天内完成了第二次治疗结果量表。重测的类内相关系数为0.89 （95% CI 0.85, 0.92）。结论：这种新的皮肤- q量表可以与其他以患者为中心的结果工具一起使用，以测量患者在身体和/或面部微创美容治疗后的外观和感觉。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Measuring Satisfaction With Minimally Invasive Aesthetic Treatments With the SKIN-Q Treatment Outcome Scale.

Background: A key outcome in aesthetic treatments is the patient's view of how their skin looks and feels after a treatment.

Objectives: To add a Treatment Outcome scale to the SKIN-Q patient-reported outcome measure.

Methods: Concept elicitation interviews were performed with patients recruited from clinics in Canada and the USA. Data were coded, analyzed, and used to draft a Treatment Outcome scale. The scale was refined with patient and expert feedback and field tested in an online sample (i.e., Prolific). Rasch measurement and classical test theory psychometric analyses were performed to examine scale reliability and validity.

Results: The concept elicitation interviews included 26 participants. The first draft of the Treatment Outcome scale included 32 items that assessed changes in appearance (e.g., look better) and wellbeing (e.g., feel more confident). Items were revised with input from 12 experts, 11 patients, and 174 online participants who had aesthetic face and/or body treatments and provided 180 survey responses, resulting in 36 items. Prolific data were collected from 499 participants who provided 542 assessments. The sample comprised 80.6% women; 78.8% had a facial treatment, 11.4% had a body treatment, and 9.8% had both a facial and body treatment. Data for a final 10-item Treatment Outcome scale fit the Rasch model (Chi-square = 50.46, df=40, p=0.124). The scale evidenced high reliability, with a person separation index and Cronbach alpha values >0.87. A total of 20/22 (91%) pre-defined construct validation hypotheses were accepted. A total of 136 participants completed the Treatment Outcome scale a second time within 7-14 days. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the test-retest was 0.89 (95% CI 0.85, 0.92).

Conclusions: This new SKIN-Q scale can be used alongside other patient-centered outcome tools to measure how patients look and feel after minimally invasive aesthetic treatments for the body and/or face.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Aesthetic Surgery Journal SURGERY-

CiteScore

6.20

自引率

20.70%

发文量

309

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.