高滴度恢复期血浆对SARS-CoV-2感染住院退伍军人临床和病毒学结局的影响:VA冠状病毒研究及疗效研究-1 (VA CURES-1)

IF 6.8 3区 医学 Q1 VIROLOGY
Edward N. Janoff, Mei-Chiung Shih, Curtis Donskey, Ilana Belitskaya-Levy, Norbert Brau, Maria C. Rodriguez-Barradas, Ernest Chan, Peter Zimmerman, Elliott K. Miller, Leroy B. Vaughan, J. Daniel Markley, Alexa M. Goldberg, Peruvemba Sriram, Antonio Anzueto, Lauren Uyeda, Lisa Zehm, Ashlea Wills, Caitlin Hutchinson, Lucas Jones, Dianne Peterson, Robert J. Ringer, Larry Dumont, Theresa Gleason, Robert A. Bonomo, Jeffrey L. Curtis, Sheldon T. Brown, the CURES-1 Trials Consortium
{"title":"高滴度恢复期血浆对SARS-CoV-2感染住院退伍军人临床和病毒学结局的影响:VA冠状病毒研究及疗效研究-1 (VA CURES-1)","authors":"Edward N. Janoff,&nbsp;Mei-Chiung Shih,&nbsp;Curtis Donskey,&nbsp;Ilana Belitskaya-Levy,&nbsp;Norbert Brau,&nbsp;Maria C. Rodriguez-Barradas,&nbsp;Ernest Chan,&nbsp;Peter Zimmerman,&nbsp;Elliott K. Miller,&nbsp;Leroy B. Vaughan,&nbsp;J. Daniel Markley,&nbsp;Alexa M. Goldberg,&nbsp;Peruvemba Sriram,&nbsp;Antonio Anzueto,&nbsp;Lauren Uyeda,&nbsp;Lisa Zehm,&nbsp;Ashlea Wills,&nbsp;Caitlin Hutchinson,&nbsp;Lucas Jones,&nbsp;Dianne Peterson,&nbsp;Robert J. Ringer,&nbsp;Larry Dumont,&nbsp;Theresa Gleason,&nbsp;Robert A. Bonomo,&nbsp;Jeffrey L. Curtis,&nbsp;Sheldon T. Brown,&nbsp;the CURES-1 Trials Consortium","doi":"10.1002/jmv.70349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In the initial absence of proven therapies, empirical COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) was rapidly introduced for individuals hospitalized for COVID-19. Seventy-five participants were randomized from November 2020 to June 2021 in a double-blind, multi-site, placebo-controlled, randomized trial (VA CURES-1) evaluating the impact of CCP vs. saline in Veterans hospitalized with COVID-19 with hypoxemia. The composite primary outcome was acute hypoxemic respiratory failure or all-cause death by Day 29. We analyzed clinical outcomes, nasal viral RNA, plasma cytokines and viral evolution over time. Among 40 participants receiving saline and 35 receiving CCP with high neutralizing titers (median 1:1420), the percent reaching the primary outcome was similar (10%), as were time to clinical recovery and to nasal viral clearance. By whole genome sequencing, viral molecular complexity evolved pre- to posttreatment more frequently in recipients of saline vs. CCP (4 of 7 (57.1%) vs. 1 of 4 (25%), respectively), based on numbers of mixed allele positions. Numbers of amino acid-changing, non-synonymous mutations in the spike protein were greater in saline vs. CCP recipients. Both outcomes suggested purifying selection (reduced overall viral infection complexity) following CCP. In conclusion, convalescent plasma showed no significant clinical impact but may influence SARS-CoV-2 complexity.</p>\n <p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04539275</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16354,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Virology","volume":"97 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of High-Titer Convalescent Plasma on Clinical and Virologic Outcomes Among Veterans Hospitalized With SARS-CoV-2 Infection: VA CoronavirUs Research and Efficacy Studies-1 (VA CURES-1)\",\"authors\":\"Edward N. Janoff,&nbsp;Mei-Chiung Shih,&nbsp;Curtis Donskey,&nbsp;Ilana Belitskaya-Levy,&nbsp;Norbert Brau,&nbsp;Maria C. Rodriguez-Barradas,&nbsp;Ernest Chan,&nbsp;Peter Zimmerman,&nbsp;Elliott K. Miller,&nbsp;Leroy B. Vaughan,&nbsp;J. Daniel Markley,&nbsp;Alexa M. Goldberg,&nbsp;Peruvemba Sriram,&nbsp;Antonio Anzueto,&nbsp;Lauren Uyeda,&nbsp;Lisa Zehm,&nbsp;Ashlea Wills,&nbsp;Caitlin Hutchinson,&nbsp;Lucas Jones,&nbsp;Dianne Peterson,&nbsp;Robert J. Ringer,&nbsp;Larry Dumont,&nbsp;Theresa Gleason,&nbsp;Robert A. Bonomo,&nbsp;Jeffrey L. Curtis,&nbsp;Sheldon T. Brown,&nbsp;the CURES-1 Trials Consortium\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jmv.70349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>In the initial absence of proven therapies, empirical COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) was rapidly introduced for individuals hospitalized for COVID-19. Seventy-five participants were randomized from November 2020 to June 2021 in a double-blind, multi-site, placebo-controlled, randomized trial (VA CURES-1) evaluating the impact of CCP vs. saline in Veterans hospitalized with COVID-19 with hypoxemia. The composite primary outcome was acute hypoxemic respiratory failure or all-cause death by Day 29. We analyzed clinical outcomes, nasal viral RNA, plasma cytokines and viral evolution over time. Among 40 participants receiving saline and 35 receiving CCP with high neutralizing titers (median 1:1420), the percent reaching the primary outcome was similar (10%), as were time to clinical recovery and to nasal viral clearance. By whole genome sequencing, viral molecular complexity evolved pre- to posttreatment more frequently in recipients of saline vs. CCP (4 of 7 (57.1%) vs. 1 of 4 (25%), respectively), based on numbers of mixed allele positions. Numbers of amino acid-changing, non-synonymous mutations in the spike protein were greater in saline vs. CCP recipients. Both outcomes suggested purifying selection (reduced overall viral infection complexity) following CCP. In conclusion, convalescent plasma showed no significant clinical impact but may influence SARS-CoV-2 complexity.</p>\\n <p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04539275</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Virology\",\"volume\":\"97 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Virology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmv.70349\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VIROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Virology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmv.70349","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在最初缺乏行之有效的治疗方法的情况下,对因COVID-19住院的患者迅速引入了经验性COVID-19恢复期血浆(CCP)。在2020年11月至2021年6月期间,75名参与者被随机纳入一项双盲、多地点、安慰剂对照、随机试验(VA CURES-1),评估CCP与生理盐水对因COVID-19合并低氧血症住院的退伍军人的影响。综合主要结局是第29天急性低氧性呼吸衰竭或全因死亡。我们分析了临床结果、鼻腔病毒RNA、血浆细胞因子和病毒随时间的演变。在接受生理盐水治疗的40名参与者和接受高中和滴度CCP治疗的35名参与者中(中位数为1:1420),达到主要结局的百分比相似(10%),临床恢复时间和鼻病毒清除时间相似。通过全基因组测序,基于混合等位基因位置的数量,生理盐水受体比CCP受体在治疗前后更频繁地进化病毒分子复杂性(7人中有4人(57.1%)vs. 4人中有1人(25%))。生理盐水受体与CCP受体相比,刺突蛋白中氨基酸改变、非同义突变的数量更多。这两个结果都表明CCP后的纯化选择(降低了总体病毒感染复杂性)。总之,恢复期血浆对临床无显著影响,但可能影响SARS-CoV-2的复杂性。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04539275
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of High-Titer Convalescent Plasma on Clinical and Virologic Outcomes Among Veterans Hospitalized With SARS-CoV-2 Infection: VA CoronavirUs Research and Efficacy Studies-1 (VA CURES-1)

In the initial absence of proven therapies, empirical COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) was rapidly introduced for individuals hospitalized for COVID-19. Seventy-five participants were randomized from November 2020 to June 2021 in a double-blind, multi-site, placebo-controlled, randomized trial (VA CURES-1) evaluating the impact of CCP vs. saline in Veterans hospitalized with COVID-19 with hypoxemia. The composite primary outcome was acute hypoxemic respiratory failure or all-cause death by Day 29. We analyzed clinical outcomes, nasal viral RNA, plasma cytokines and viral evolution over time. Among 40 participants receiving saline and 35 receiving CCP with high neutralizing titers (median 1:1420), the percent reaching the primary outcome was similar (10%), as were time to clinical recovery and to nasal viral clearance. By whole genome sequencing, viral molecular complexity evolved pre- to posttreatment more frequently in recipients of saline vs. CCP (4 of 7 (57.1%) vs. 1 of 4 (25%), respectively), based on numbers of mixed allele positions. Numbers of amino acid-changing, non-synonymous mutations in the spike protein were greater in saline vs. CCP recipients. Both outcomes suggested purifying selection (reduced overall viral infection complexity) following CCP. In conclusion, convalescent plasma showed no significant clinical impact but may influence SARS-CoV-2 complexity.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04539275

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Virology
Journal of Medical Virology 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
23.20
自引率
2.40%
发文量
777
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Virology focuses on publishing original scientific papers on both basic and applied research related to viruses that affect humans. The journal publishes reports covering a wide range of topics, including the characterization, diagnosis, epidemiology, immunology, and pathogenesis of human virus infections. It also includes studies on virus morphology, genetics, replication, and interactions with host cells. The intended readership of the journal includes virologists, microbiologists, immunologists, infectious disease specialists, diagnostic laboratory technologists, epidemiologists, hematologists, and cell biologists. The Journal of Medical Virology is indexed and abstracted in various databases, including Abstracts in Anthropology (Sage), CABI, AgBiotech News & Information, National Agricultural Library, Biological Abstracts, Embase, Global Health, Web of Science, Veterinary Bulletin, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信