Irfan Haider, Muhammad Attique Khan, Saleha Masood, Shabbab Ali Algamdi, Areej Alasiry, Mehrez Marzougui, Yunyoung Nam
{"title":"基于遥感影像数据集的土地利用土地覆盖分类预训练深度学习模型的性能","authors":"Irfan Haider, Muhammad Attique Khan, Saleha Masood, Shabbab Ali Algamdi, Areej Alasiry, Mehrez Marzougui, Yunyoung Nam","doi":"10.1007/s12665-025-12317-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study presents a comparative analysis of ten pre-trained convolutional neural network (CNN) models, evaluated across three remote sensing datasets: EuroSat, NWPU, and Earth Hazards (Land Sliding). We investigate the interplay between model architecture and classifier selection by incorporating five different neural network (NN) classifiers, emphasizing their impact on predictive accuracy and computational efficiency. Due to its densely connected architecture, DenseNet201 achieved the highest accuracy—97% on EuroSat, 99.40% on NWPU, and 97.80% on Earth Hazards. In contrast, MobileNetV2, while slightly less accurate, demonstrated superior computational efficiency, recording the shortest prediction times of 39.943 s on EuroSat, 27.482 s on NWPU, and 2.8986 s on Earth Hazards. Additionally, classifier choice significantly influenced performance, with the Wide NN classifier excelling in diverse datasets and the Medium NN classifier optimizing speed. Our findings underscore the importance of balancing accuracy and efficiency in selecting CNN models for remote sensing applications, suggesting future research should explore ensembling techniques and lightweight models to enhance performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of pre-trained deep learning models for land use land cover classification using remote sensing imaging datasets\",\"authors\":\"Irfan Haider, Muhammad Attique Khan, Saleha Masood, Shabbab Ali Algamdi, Areej Alasiry, Mehrez Marzougui, Yunyoung Nam\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12665-025-12317-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study presents a comparative analysis of ten pre-trained convolutional neural network (CNN) models, evaluated across three remote sensing datasets: EuroSat, NWPU, and Earth Hazards (Land Sliding). We investigate the interplay between model architecture and classifier selection by incorporating five different neural network (NN) classifiers, emphasizing their impact on predictive accuracy and computational efficiency. Due to its densely connected architecture, DenseNet201 achieved the highest accuracy—97% on EuroSat, 99.40% on NWPU, and 97.80% on Earth Hazards. In contrast, MobileNetV2, while slightly less accurate, demonstrated superior computational efficiency, recording the shortest prediction times of 39.943 s on EuroSat, 27.482 s on NWPU, and 2.8986 s on Earth Hazards. Additionally, classifier choice significantly influenced performance, with the Wide NN classifier excelling in diverse datasets and the Medium NN classifier optimizing speed. Our findings underscore the importance of balancing accuracy and efficiency in selecting CNN models for remote sensing applications, suggesting future research should explore ensembling techniques and lightweight models to enhance performance.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"volume\":\"84 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12317-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12317-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance of pre-trained deep learning models for land use land cover classification using remote sensing imaging datasets
This study presents a comparative analysis of ten pre-trained convolutional neural network (CNN) models, evaluated across three remote sensing datasets: EuroSat, NWPU, and Earth Hazards (Land Sliding). We investigate the interplay between model architecture and classifier selection by incorporating five different neural network (NN) classifiers, emphasizing their impact on predictive accuracy and computational efficiency. Due to its densely connected architecture, DenseNet201 achieved the highest accuracy—97% on EuroSat, 99.40% on NWPU, and 97.80% on Earth Hazards. In contrast, MobileNetV2, while slightly less accurate, demonstrated superior computational efficiency, recording the shortest prediction times of 39.943 s on EuroSat, 27.482 s on NWPU, and 2.8986 s on Earth Hazards. Additionally, classifier choice significantly influenced performance, with the Wide NN classifier excelling in diverse datasets and the Medium NN classifier optimizing speed. Our findings underscore the importance of balancing accuracy and efficiency in selecting CNN models for remote sensing applications, suggesting future research should explore ensembling techniques and lightweight models to enhance performance.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth:
Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices
Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water
Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans
Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards
Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth
Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources
Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials
Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems
Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment
In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.