撒哈拉的档案和它的来世

IF 1.4 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Fiona Mc Laughlin
{"title":"撒哈拉的档案和它的来世","authors":"Fiona Mc Laughlin","doi":"10.1007/s10502-025-09482-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>An archive in Mbembe’s (in: Hamilton C et al. (eds) Refiguring the archive. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 19–26, 2002) interrogation of the institution is necessarily defined by two elements: “the building itself and the documents stored there” (2002:19). In this paper I argue that Tifinagh writing in the form or rock inscriptions in the Algerian Sahara constitutes a materially different kind of desert archive that nonetheless fulfils the role of “instituting imaginary” that Mbembe attributes to the archive. Tifinagh is a relative of the ancient Libyco-Berber script, and is used by Kel Ahaggar Tuareg, an Amazigh (Berber) people, as a yet unbroken writing practice that has existed for centuries. Consulted by French colonial actors in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the Tifinagh archive contributed to the European invention of its Tuareg authors as “close others” whom they placed on a racial hierarchy above Arabs. In the post-independence era of Arab nation building in North Africa, governments attempted to suppressed expressions of Amazigh culture and identity, and relegated Tifinagh to the domain of folklore. In the popular revindication of Amazigh identity in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries activists such as those of the Agraw Imazighen or the Berber Academy consulted the Tifinagh archive to resuscitate an alphabet that had disappeared from use in North Africa in late antiquity. Ultimately, although this desert archive presents a materiality that is at odds with Mbembe’s notion of the archive, it nonetheless accomplishes many of the functions he attributes to the archive.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46131,"journal":{"name":"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE","volume":"25 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Saharan archive and its afterlives\",\"authors\":\"Fiona Mc Laughlin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10502-025-09482-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>An archive in Mbembe’s (in: Hamilton C et al. (eds) Refiguring the archive. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 19–26, 2002) interrogation of the institution is necessarily defined by two elements: “the building itself and the documents stored there” (2002:19). In this paper I argue that Tifinagh writing in the form or rock inscriptions in the Algerian Sahara constitutes a materially different kind of desert archive that nonetheless fulfils the role of “instituting imaginary” that Mbembe attributes to the archive. Tifinagh is a relative of the ancient Libyco-Berber script, and is used by Kel Ahaggar Tuareg, an Amazigh (Berber) people, as a yet unbroken writing practice that has existed for centuries. Consulted by French colonial actors in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the Tifinagh archive contributed to the European invention of its Tuareg authors as “close others” whom they placed on a racial hierarchy above Arabs. In the post-independence era of Arab nation building in North Africa, governments attempted to suppressed expressions of Amazigh culture and identity, and relegated Tifinagh to the domain of folklore. In the popular revindication of Amazigh identity in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries activists such as those of the Agraw Imazighen or the Berber Academy consulted the Tifinagh archive to resuscitate an alphabet that had disappeared from use in North Africa in late antiquity. Ultimately, although this desert archive presents a materiality that is at odds with Mbembe’s notion of the archive, it nonetheless accomplishes many of the functions he attributes to the archive.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE\",\"volume\":\"25 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-025-09482-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-025-09482-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Mbembe的档案(见:Hamilton C等人编)重新配置档案。Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 19-26, 2002)对机构的讯问必然由两个要素定义:“建筑本身和存储在那里的文件”(2002:19)。在这篇论文中,我认为在阿尔及利亚撒哈拉沙漠中以岩石铭文形式的提菲纳文字构成了一种物质上不同的沙漠档案,尽管如此,它还是履行了Mbembe赋予档案的“建立想象”的角色。Tifinagh是古利比亚-柏柏尔文字的亲戚,被阿马齐格(柏柏尔)人Kel Ahaggar Tuareg使用,作为一种存在了几个世纪的完整的书写实践。19世纪末和20世纪初,法国殖民演员咨询了蒂菲纳档案馆,他们将图阿雷格作家视为“亲密的其他人”,并将其置于阿拉伯人之上的种族等级。在北非阿拉伯国家建设的后独立时代,政府试图压制阿马齐格文化和身份的表达,并将提菲纳降级为民间传说的领域。在20世纪和21世纪流行的对阿马齐格人身份的重新确认中,像Agraw Imazighen或柏柏尔学院(Berber Academy)这样的激进分子查阅了提菲纳档案馆,以恢复一种在古代晚期从北非消失的字母表。最终,尽管这个沙漠档案呈现出与Mbembe的档案概念不一致的物质性,但它仍然完成了他赋予档案的许多功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Saharan archive and its afterlives

An archive in Mbembe’s (in: Hamilton C et al. (eds) Refiguring the archive. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 19–26, 2002) interrogation of the institution is necessarily defined by two elements: “the building itself and the documents stored there” (2002:19). In this paper I argue that Tifinagh writing in the form or rock inscriptions in the Algerian Sahara constitutes a materially different kind of desert archive that nonetheless fulfils the role of “instituting imaginary” that Mbembe attributes to the archive. Tifinagh is a relative of the ancient Libyco-Berber script, and is used by Kel Ahaggar Tuareg, an Amazigh (Berber) people, as a yet unbroken writing practice that has existed for centuries. Consulted by French colonial actors in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the Tifinagh archive contributed to the European invention of its Tuareg authors as “close others” whom they placed on a racial hierarchy above Arabs. In the post-independence era of Arab nation building in North Africa, governments attempted to suppressed expressions of Amazigh culture and identity, and relegated Tifinagh to the domain of folklore. In the popular revindication of Amazigh identity in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries activists such as those of the Agraw Imazighen or the Berber Academy consulted the Tifinagh archive to resuscitate an alphabet that had disappeared from use in North Africa in late antiquity. Ultimately, although this desert archive presents a materiality that is at odds with Mbembe’s notion of the archive, it nonetheless accomplishes many of the functions he attributes to the archive.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ARCHIVAL SCIENCE
ARCHIVAL SCIENCE INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
18.20%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Archival Science promotes the development of archival science as an autonomous scientific discipline. The journal covers all aspects of archival science theory, methodology, and practice. Moreover, it investigates different cultural approaches to creation, management and provision of access to archives, records, and data. It also seeks to promote the exchange and comparison of concepts, views and attitudes related to recordkeeping issues around the world.Archival Science''s approach is integrated, interdisciplinary, and intercultural. Its scope encompasses the entire field of recorded process-related information, analyzed in terms of form, structure, and context. To meet its objectives, the journal draws from scientific disciplines that deal with the function of records and the way they are created, preserved, and retrieved; the context in which information is generated, managed, and used; and the social and cultural environment of records creation at different times and places.Covers all aspects of archival science theory, methodology, and practiceInvestigates different cultural approaches to creation, management and provision of access to archives, records, and dataPromotes the exchange and comparison of concepts, views, and attitudes related to recordkeeping issues around the worldAddresses the entire field of recorded process-related information, analyzed in terms of form, structure, and context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信