贸易信用风险审计:来自BAPCPA和COVID-19的证据

IF 1.2 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Stephanie Walton , Yiyang Zhang (Ian)
{"title":"贸易信用风险审计:来自BAPCPA和COVID-19的证据","authors":"Stephanie Walton ,&nbsp;Yiyang Zhang (Ian)","doi":"10.1016/j.adiac.2025.100819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examine how auditors assess trade credit risk. While trade credit is an increasingly common financing tool, it is not uncommon for trade credit to become past due, increasing a supplier's own financial risks. We use two events reflecting regulatory and global sources of variation in trade credit risk: BAPCPA's strengthening of creditor protections and the COVID-19 pandemic's supply chain disruptions. Using a difference-in-difference design, we find that post-BAPCPA auditors levy lower audit fees on suppliers whose customers exhibit greater trade credit risk, reflecting the greater certainty surrounding regulatory enhancement of creditor protections. We further find that post-COVID-19 auditors levy higher audit fees on suppliers whose customers exhibit greater trade credit risk. We then investigate the role of supply chain risks in addition to audit effort and audit quality implications. Overall, we find evidence that auditors account for trade credit risk in audit pricing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46906,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Accounting","volume":"68 ","pages":"Article 100819"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Auditing trade credit risk: Evidence from BAPCPA and COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Walton ,&nbsp;Yiyang Zhang (Ian)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.adiac.2025.100819\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We examine how auditors assess trade credit risk. While trade credit is an increasingly common financing tool, it is not uncommon for trade credit to become past due, increasing a supplier's own financial risks. We use two events reflecting regulatory and global sources of variation in trade credit risk: BAPCPA's strengthening of creditor protections and the COVID-19 pandemic's supply chain disruptions. Using a difference-in-difference design, we find that post-BAPCPA auditors levy lower audit fees on suppliers whose customers exhibit greater trade credit risk, reflecting the greater certainty surrounding regulatory enhancement of creditor protections. We further find that post-COVID-19 auditors levy higher audit fees on suppliers whose customers exhibit greater trade credit risk. We then investigate the role of supply chain risks in addition to audit effort and audit quality implications. Overall, we find evidence that auditors account for trade credit risk in audit pricing.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Accounting\",\"volume\":\"68 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100819\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0882611025000148\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0882611025000148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了审计师如何评估贸易信用风险。虽然贸易信贷是一种日益普遍的融资工具,但贸易信贷逾期的情况并不罕见,从而增加了供应商自身的金融风险。我们使用了反映贸易信用风险监管和全球变化来源的两个事件:BAPCPA加强债权人保护和COVID-19大流行的供应链中断。利用差中之差设计,我们发现后bapcpa审计师对其客户表现出更大的贸易信用风险的供应商征收更低的审计费用,反映了围绕加强债权人保护的监管的更大确定性。我们进一步发现,后covid -19审计师对客户表现出更大贸易信用风险的供应商征收更高的审计费用。然后,除了审计工作和审计质量影响外,我们还调查了供应链风险的作用。总体而言,我们发现审计师在审计定价中考虑了贸易信用风险的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Auditing trade credit risk: Evidence from BAPCPA and COVID-19
We examine how auditors assess trade credit risk. While trade credit is an increasingly common financing tool, it is not uncommon for trade credit to become past due, increasing a supplier's own financial risks. We use two events reflecting regulatory and global sources of variation in trade credit risk: BAPCPA's strengthening of creditor protections and the COVID-19 pandemic's supply chain disruptions. Using a difference-in-difference design, we find that post-BAPCPA auditors levy lower audit fees on suppliers whose customers exhibit greater trade credit risk, reflecting the greater certainty surrounding regulatory enhancement of creditor protections. We further find that post-COVID-19 auditors levy higher audit fees on suppliers whose customers exhibit greater trade credit risk. We then investigate the role of supply chain risks in addition to audit effort and audit quality implications. Overall, we find evidence that auditors account for trade credit risk in audit pricing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Accounting
Advances in Accounting BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Advances in Accounting, incorporating Advances in International Accounting continues to provide an important international forum for discourse among and between academic and practicing accountants on the issues of significance. Emphasis continues to be placed on original commentary, critical analysis and creative research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信