{"title":"绿色结构性货币政策与企业碳减排的不对称:来自中国的证据","authors":"Kai Wan , Xiaolin Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.eap.2025.05.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using data from Chinese listed companies, this paper examines the impact of green structural monetary policy on corporate carbon emissions and its underlying mechanisms from two perspectives: bank credit reallocation and corporate emission reduction strategies. The study finds that the impact of green structural monetary policy on corporate carbon emissions is asymmetric. While the policy significantly reduces carbon emissions for clean enterprises, its suppressive effect on emissions from heavily polluting enterprises is relatively limited. The mechanism test results indicate that in terms of bank credit decisions, the green structural credit policy restricts the financing scale of heavily polluting enterprises, increases their financing costs, and simultaneously provides credit incentives for clean enterprises. In terms of corporate carbon reduction strategies, the asymmetry of policy effects partly stems from differences in how policies influence corporate strategic behaviors. Heavily polluting firms tend to adopt “low-cost strategies,” characterized by end-of-pipe treatment investments and strategic green innovations. In contrast, clean firms are more inclined to pursue “competitive advantage strategies,” emphasizing proactive investment in prevention and substantive green innovations. Further analysis reveals that the asymmetric emissions-reduction effects of the policy are jointly influenced by external and internal factors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54200,"journal":{"name":"Economic Analysis and Policy","volume":"86 ","pages":"Pages 1914-1928"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Green structural monetary policy and firms’ Asymmetric carbon emission reduction: Evidence from China\",\"authors\":\"Kai Wan , Xiaolin Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eap.2025.05.031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Using data from Chinese listed companies, this paper examines the impact of green structural monetary policy on corporate carbon emissions and its underlying mechanisms from two perspectives: bank credit reallocation and corporate emission reduction strategies. The study finds that the impact of green structural monetary policy on corporate carbon emissions is asymmetric. While the policy significantly reduces carbon emissions for clean enterprises, its suppressive effect on emissions from heavily polluting enterprises is relatively limited. The mechanism test results indicate that in terms of bank credit decisions, the green structural credit policy restricts the financing scale of heavily polluting enterprises, increases their financing costs, and simultaneously provides credit incentives for clean enterprises. In terms of corporate carbon reduction strategies, the asymmetry of policy effects partly stems from differences in how policies influence corporate strategic behaviors. Heavily polluting firms tend to adopt “low-cost strategies,” characterized by end-of-pipe treatment investments and strategic green innovations. In contrast, clean firms are more inclined to pursue “competitive advantage strategies,” emphasizing proactive investment in prevention and substantive green innovations. Further analysis reveals that the asymmetric emissions-reduction effects of the policy are jointly influenced by external and internal factors.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Analysis and Policy\",\"volume\":\"86 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 1914-1928\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Analysis and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625001985\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Analysis and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625001985","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Green structural monetary policy and firms’ Asymmetric carbon emission reduction: Evidence from China
Using data from Chinese listed companies, this paper examines the impact of green structural monetary policy on corporate carbon emissions and its underlying mechanisms from two perspectives: bank credit reallocation and corporate emission reduction strategies. The study finds that the impact of green structural monetary policy on corporate carbon emissions is asymmetric. While the policy significantly reduces carbon emissions for clean enterprises, its suppressive effect on emissions from heavily polluting enterprises is relatively limited. The mechanism test results indicate that in terms of bank credit decisions, the green structural credit policy restricts the financing scale of heavily polluting enterprises, increases their financing costs, and simultaneously provides credit incentives for clean enterprises. In terms of corporate carbon reduction strategies, the asymmetry of policy effects partly stems from differences in how policies influence corporate strategic behaviors. Heavily polluting firms tend to adopt “low-cost strategies,” characterized by end-of-pipe treatment investments and strategic green innovations. In contrast, clean firms are more inclined to pursue “competitive advantage strategies,” emphasizing proactive investment in prevention and substantive green innovations. Further analysis reveals that the asymmetric emissions-reduction effects of the policy are jointly influenced by external and internal factors.
期刊介绍:
Economic Analysis and Policy (established 1970) publishes articles from all branches of economics with a particular focus on research, theoretical and applied, which has strong policy relevance. The journal also publishes survey articles and empirical replications on key policy issues. Authors are expected to highlight the main insights in a non-technical introduction and in the conclusion.