基于视频的基本手术技能学习——一项随机试验

IF 1.4 Q3 SURGERY
I. Dantas , I. Jorge , A. Nicolau , M. Vales , C. Coutinho , S. Rodrigues , P. Febra , V.N. Lopes
{"title":"基于视频的基本手术技能学习——一项随机试验","authors":"I. Dantas ,&nbsp;I. Jorge ,&nbsp;A. Nicolau ,&nbsp;M. Vales ,&nbsp;C. Coutinho ,&nbsp;S. Rodrigues ,&nbsp;P. Febra ,&nbsp;V.N. Lopes","doi":"10.1016/j.sopen.2025.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The authors sought to evaluate how video-based learning compares to traditional learning method in basic surgical skills.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Prospective, randomized and blinded case-control study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto.</div></div><div><h3>Participants and methods</h3><div>Fifty medical students were randomized into two groups: traditional learning (in-person course) and video-based learning. Four sutures were taught to both groups: simple interrupted, cruciate mattress, horizontal mattress and vertical mattress sutures.</div><div>A first evaluation occurred following the learning sessions, and a retention evaluation was performed two weeks later.</div><div>Both groups were compared on performance quality (using a modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills scale (mOSATS)), time to complete the procedure, and participant satisfaction and self-evaluation (using a Likert-like questionnaire). The frequency and duration of autonomous training by the video-based learning group was documented.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Performance quality was similar in the first evaluation, except for the horizontal [25.88 (SD (Standard Deviation) 3.58) vs 28.28 (SD 3.79), <em>p</em> = 0.04] and vertical mattress sutures [24.14 (SD 3.59) vs 28.44 (SD 3.69), <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01], where the video-based learning group got higher mOSATS scores. In the retention evaluation, the video-based learning group demonstrated higher mOSATS ratings.</div><div>The time spent learning with videos was 45 min longer [median in hours: 2:15:30 (IQR (Interquartile Range) 2:17:44)] than the in-person course duration. Overall, the traditional learning group completed sutures faster (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Video-based learning may be an effective alternative to traditional teaching of basic surgical skills, in performance quality and retention, offering better resource allocation and cost savings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74892,"journal":{"name":"Surgery open science","volume":"26 ","pages":"Pages 94-106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Video-based learning for basic surgical skills - A randomized trial\",\"authors\":\"I. Dantas ,&nbsp;I. Jorge ,&nbsp;A. Nicolau ,&nbsp;M. Vales ,&nbsp;C. Coutinho ,&nbsp;S. Rodrigues ,&nbsp;P. Febra ,&nbsp;V.N. Lopes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sopen.2025.05.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The authors sought to evaluate how video-based learning compares to traditional learning method in basic surgical skills.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Prospective, randomized and blinded case-control study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto.</div></div><div><h3>Participants and methods</h3><div>Fifty medical students were randomized into two groups: traditional learning (in-person course) and video-based learning. Four sutures were taught to both groups: simple interrupted, cruciate mattress, horizontal mattress and vertical mattress sutures.</div><div>A first evaluation occurred following the learning sessions, and a retention evaluation was performed two weeks later.</div><div>Both groups were compared on performance quality (using a modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills scale (mOSATS)), time to complete the procedure, and participant satisfaction and self-evaluation (using a Likert-like questionnaire). The frequency and duration of autonomous training by the video-based learning group was documented.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Performance quality was similar in the first evaluation, except for the horizontal [25.88 (SD (Standard Deviation) 3.58) vs 28.28 (SD 3.79), <em>p</em> = 0.04] and vertical mattress sutures [24.14 (SD 3.59) vs 28.44 (SD 3.69), <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01], where the video-based learning group got higher mOSATS scores. In the retention evaluation, the video-based learning group demonstrated higher mOSATS ratings.</div><div>The time spent learning with videos was 45 min longer [median in hours: 2:15:30 (IQR (Interquartile Range) 2:17:44)] than the in-person course duration. Overall, the traditional learning group completed sutures faster (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Video-based learning may be an effective alternative to traditional teaching of basic surgical skills, in performance quality and retention, offering better resource allocation and cost savings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery open science\",\"volume\":\"26 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 94-106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery open science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845025000417\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845025000417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价基于视频的外科基本技能学习方法与传统学习方法的比较。前瞻性、随机、盲法病例对照研究。波尔图大学医学院。参与者和方法50名医学生随机分为两组:传统学习(面对面课程)和基于视频的学习。两组分别教授四种缝合术:简单间断缝合术、十字缝合术、水平缝合术和垂直缝合术。第一次评估在学习课程之后进行,两周后进行记忆力评估。比较两组的表现质量(使用改进的客观结构化技术技能评估量表(mOSATS))、完成程序的时间、参与者满意度和自我评价(使用李克特式问卷)。记录了视频学习组自主训练的频率和持续时间。结果除水平缝[25.88 (SD (Standard Deviation) 3.58)对28.28 (SD 3.79), p = 0.04]和垂直缝[24.14 (SD 3.59)对28.44 (SD 3.69), p <;0.01],其中视频学习组获得更高的mOSATS分数。在记忆评估中,视频学习组表现出更高的mOSATS评分。视频学习时间比现场学习时间长45分钟[小时中位数:2:15:30(四分位间距:2:17:44)]。总体而言,传统学习组完成缝合的速度更快(p <;0.01)。结论视频教学可有效替代传统的外科基本技能教学,提高教学效果,提高教学质量,节约教学成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Video-based learning for basic surgical skills - A randomized trial

Objective

The authors sought to evaluate how video-based learning compares to traditional learning method in basic surgical skills.

Design

Prospective, randomized and blinded case-control study.

Setting

Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto.

Participants and methods

Fifty medical students were randomized into two groups: traditional learning (in-person course) and video-based learning. Four sutures were taught to both groups: simple interrupted, cruciate mattress, horizontal mattress and vertical mattress sutures.
A first evaluation occurred following the learning sessions, and a retention evaluation was performed two weeks later.
Both groups were compared on performance quality (using a modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills scale (mOSATS)), time to complete the procedure, and participant satisfaction and self-evaluation (using a Likert-like questionnaire). The frequency and duration of autonomous training by the video-based learning group was documented.

Results

Performance quality was similar in the first evaluation, except for the horizontal [25.88 (SD (Standard Deviation) 3.58) vs 28.28 (SD 3.79), p = 0.04] and vertical mattress sutures [24.14 (SD 3.59) vs 28.44 (SD 3.69), p < 0.01], where the video-based learning group got higher mOSATS scores. In the retention evaluation, the video-based learning group demonstrated higher mOSATS ratings.
The time spent learning with videos was 45 min longer [median in hours: 2:15:30 (IQR (Interquartile Range) 2:17:44)] than the in-person course duration. Overall, the traditional learning group completed sutures faster (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Video-based learning may be an effective alternative to traditional teaching of basic surgical skills, in performance quality and retention, offering better resource allocation and cost savings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信