I. Dantas , I. Jorge , A. Nicolau , M. Vales , C. Coutinho , S. Rodrigues , P. Febra , V.N. Lopes
{"title":"基于视频的基本手术技能学习——一项随机试验","authors":"I. Dantas , I. Jorge , A. Nicolau , M. Vales , C. Coutinho , S. Rodrigues , P. Febra , V.N. Lopes","doi":"10.1016/j.sopen.2025.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The authors sought to evaluate how video-based learning compares to traditional learning method in basic surgical skills.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Prospective, randomized and blinded case-control study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto.</div></div><div><h3>Participants and methods</h3><div>Fifty medical students were randomized into two groups: traditional learning (in-person course) and video-based learning. Four sutures were taught to both groups: simple interrupted, cruciate mattress, horizontal mattress and vertical mattress sutures.</div><div>A first evaluation occurred following the learning sessions, and a retention evaluation was performed two weeks later.</div><div>Both groups were compared on performance quality (using a modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills scale (mOSATS)), time to complete the procedure, and participant satisfaction and self-evaluation (using a Likert-like questionnaire). The frequency and duration of autonomous training by the video-based learning group was documented.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Performance quality was similar in the first evaluation, except for the horizontal [25.88 (SD (Standard Deviation) 3.58) vs 28.28 (SD 3.79), <em>p</em> = 0.04] and vertical mattress sutures [24.14 (SD 3.59) vs 28.44 (SD 3.69), <em>p</em> < 0.01], where the video-based learning group got higher mOSATS scores. In the retention evaluation, the video-based learning group demonstrated higher mOSATS ratings.</div><div>The time spent learning with videos was 45 min longer [median in hours: 2:15:30 (IQR (Interquartile Range) 2:17:44)] than the in-person course duration. Overall, the traditional learning group completed sutures faster (<em>p</em> < 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Video-based learning may be an effective alternative to traditional teaching of basic surgical skills, in performance quality and retention, offering better resource allocation and cost savings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74892,"journal":{"name":"Surgery open science","volume":"26 ","pages":"Pages 94-106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Video-based learning for basic surgical skills - A randomized trial\",\"authors\":\"I. Dantas , I. Jorge , A. Nicolau , M. Vales , C. Coutinho , S. Rodrigues , P. Febra , V.N. Lopes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sopen.2025.05.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The authors sought to evaluate how video-based learning compares to traditional learning method in basic surgical skills.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Prospective, randomized and blinded case-control study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto.</div></div><div><h3>Participants and methods</h3><div>Fifty medical students were randomized into two groups: traditional learning (in-person course) and video-based learning. Four sutures were taught to both groups: simple interrupted, cruciate mattress, horizontal mattress and vertical mattress sutures.</div><div>A first evaluation occurred following the learning sessions, and a retention evaluation was performed two weeks later.</div><div>Both groups were compared on performance quality (using a modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills scale (mOSATS)), time to complete the procedure, and participant satisfaction and self-evaluation (using a Likert-like questionnaire). The frequency and duration of autonomous training by the video-based learning group was documented.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Performance quality was similar in the first evaluation, except for the horizontal [25.88 (SD (Standard Deviation) 3.58) vs 28.28 (SD 3.79), <em>p</em> = 0.04] and vertical mattress sutures [24.14 (SD 3.59) vs 28.44 (SD 3.69), <em>p</em> < 0.01], where the video-based learning group got higher mOSATS scores. In the retention evaluation, the video-based learning group demonstrated higher mOSATS ratings.</div><div>The time spent learning with videos was 45 min longer [median in hours: 2:15:30 (IQR (Interquartile Range) 2:17:44)] than the in-person course duration. Overall, the traditional learning group completed sutures faster (<em>p</em> < 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Video-based learning may be an effective alternative to traditional teaching of basic surgical skills, in performance quality and retention, offering better resource allocation and cost savings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery open science\",\"volume\":\"26 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 94-106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery open science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845025000417\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845025000417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的评价基于视频的外科基本技能学习方法与传统学习方法的比较。前瞻性、随机、盲法病例对照研究。波尔图大学医学院。参与者和方法50名医学生随机分为两组:传统学习(面对面课程)和基于视频的学习。两组分别教授四种缝合术:简单间断缝合术、十字缝合术、水平缝合术和垂直缝合术。第一次评估在学习课程之后进行,两周后进行记忆力评估。比较两组的表现质量(使用改进的客观结构化技术技能评估量表(mOSATS))、完成程序的时间、参与者满意度和自我评价(使用李克特式问卷)。记录了视频学习组自主训练的频率和持续时间。结果除水平缝[25.88 (SD (Standard Deviation) 3.58)对28.28 (SD 3.79), p = 0.04]和垂直缝[24.14 (SD 3.59)对28.44 (SD 3.69), p <;0.01],其中视频学习组获得更高的mOSATS分数。在记忆评估中,视频学习组表现出更高的mOSATS评分。视频学习时间比现场学习时间长45分钟[小时中位数:2:15:30(四分位间距:2:17:44)]。总体而言,传统学习组完成缝合的速度更快(p <;0.01)。结论视频教学可有效替代传统的外科基本技能教学,提高教学效果,提高教学质量,节约教学成本。
Video-based learning for basic surgical skills - A randomized trial
Objective
The authors sought to evaluate how video-based learning compares to traditional learning method in basic surgical skills.
Design
Prospective, randomized and blinded case-control study.
Setting
Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto.
Participants and methods
Fifty medical students were randomized into two groups: traditional learning (in-person course) and video-based learning. Four sutures were taught to both groups: simple interrupted, cruciate mattress, horizontal mattress and vertical mattress sutures.
A first evaluation occurred following the learning sessions, and a retention evaluation was performed two weeks later.
Both groups were compared on performance quality (using a modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills scale (mOSATS)), time to complete the procedure, and participant satisfaction and self-evaluation (using a Likert-like questionnaire). The frequency and duration of autonomous training by the video-based learning group was documented.
Results
Performance quality was similar in the first evaluation, except for the horizontal [25.88 (SD (Standard Deviation) 3.58) vs 28.28 (SD 3.79), p = 0.04] and vertical mattress sutures [24.14 (SD 3.59) vs 28.44 (SD 3.69), p < 0.01], where the video-based learning group got higher mOSATS scores. In the retention evaluation, the video-based learning group demonstrated higher mOSATS ratings.
The time spent learning with videos was 45 min longer [median in hours: 2:15:30 (IQR (Interquartile Range) 2:17:44)] than the in-person course duration. Overall, the traditional learning group completed sutures faster (p < 0.01).
Conclusion
Video-based learning may be an effective alternative to traditional teaching of basic surgical skills, in performance quality and retention, offering better resource allocation and cost savings.