使用贝叶斯方法,睡眠类型与心血管对早晨认知挑战的反应之间没有关联

Q2 Medicine
Larissa N. Wüst , Christian Cajochen , Ruta Lasauskaite
{"title":"使用贝叶斯方法,睡眠类型与心血管对早晨认知挑战的反应之间没有关联","authors":"Larissa N. Wüst ,&nbsp;Christian Cajochen ,&nbsp;Ruta Lasauskaite","doi":"10.1016/j.nbscr.2025.100125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A chronotype is defined as a preference for certain behaviours (e.g., sleep and wake) to occur at specific times of day. It is therefore also temporally linked with cognitive performance across the day. In an exploratory analysis, we sought to find associations between chronotypes determined from self-reported habitual sleep timing and from salivary melatonin onset with mental effort during a 2-back working memory task. Mental effort was operationalized as sympathetic beta-adrenergic impact on the heart, which is best reflected by the cardiac pre-ejection period (PEP) and also influences systolic blood pressure (SBP). Each participant underwent two experimental sessions in the morning: once after sleeping for 8 h and once after sleeping for 5 h the night before. To determine the timing of evening melatonin onset, participants took saliva samples at hourly intervals at home in the evening, prior to their experimental sessions. Chronotypes were determined using reported sleep times from the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire and average melatonin onset during both sleep conditions. Based on this, participants were grouped into early, intermediate, or late types. Neither alertness (<em>BF</em><sub><em>10</em></sub> = 0.019), perceived task demand (<em>BF</em><sub><em>10</em></sub> = 0.008), nor SBP response (<em>BF</em><sub><em>10</em></sub> = 0.268) were credibly impacted by sleep-time derived chronotype, while the association with PEP response (<em>BF</em><sub><em>10</em></sub> = 0.631) during a cognitive challenge in the morning was inconclusive. Similarly, the timing of evening melatonin onset did not affect alertness (<em>BF</em><sub><em>10</em></sub> = 0.003), perceived task demand (<em>BF</em><sub><em>10</em></sub> = 0.006), or PEP or SBP response (PEP: <em>BF</em><sub><em>10</em></sub> = 0.232, SBP: <em>BF</em><sub><em>10</em></sub> = 0.263) during the cognitive challenge. Our data shows no impact of chronotypes on effort-related cardiovascular response during a cognitive challenge in the morning, which was scheduled according to habitual sleep times.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37827,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Sleep and Circadian Rhythms","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No association between chronotype and cardiovascular response to a cognitive challenge in the morning using a Bayesian approach\",\"authors\":\"Larissa N. Wüst ,&nbsp;Christian Cajochen ,&nbsp;Ruta Lasauskaite\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nbscr.2025.100125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A chronotype is defined as a preference for certain behaviours (e.g., sleep and wake) to occur at specific times of day. It is therefore also temporally linked with cognitive performance across the day. In an exploratory analysis, we sought to find associations between chronotypes determined from self-reported habitual sleep timing and from salivary melatonin onset with mental effort during a 2-back working memory task. Mental effort was operationalized as sympathetic beta-adrenergic impact on the heart, which is best reflected by the cardiac pre-ejection period (PEP) and also influences systolic blood pressure (SBP). Each participant underwent two experimental sessions in the morning: once after sleeping for 8 h and once after sleeping for 5 h the night before. To determine the timing of evening melatonin onset, participants took saliva samples at hourly intervals at home in the evening, prior to their experimental sessions. Chronotypes were determined using reported sleep times from the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire and average melatonin onset during both sleep conditions. Based on this, participants were grouped into early, intermediate, or late types. Neither alertness (<em>BF</em><sub><em>10</em></sub> = 0.019), perceived task demand (<em>BF</em><sub><em>10</em></sub> = 0.008), nor SBP response (<em>BF</em><sub><em>10</em></sub> = 0.268) were credibly impacted by sleep-time derived chronotype, while the association with PEP response (<em>BF</em><sub><em>10</em></sub> = 0.631) during a cognitive challenge in the morning was inconclusive. Similarly, the timing of evening melatonin onset did not affect alertness (<em>BF</em><sub><em>10</em></sub> = 0.003), perceived task demand (<em>BF</em><sub><em>10</em></sub> = 0.006), or PEP or SBP response (PEP: <em>BF</em><sub><em>10</em></sub> = 0.232, SBP: <em>BF</em><sub><em>10</em></sub> = 0.263) during the cognitive challenge. Our data shows no impact of chronotypes on effort-related cardiovascular response during a cognitive challenge in the morning, which was scheduled according to habitual sleep times.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurobiology of Sleep and Circadian Rhythms\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurobiology of Sleep and Circadian Rhythms\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451994425000148\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurobiology of Sleep and Circadian Rhythms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451994425000148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

时间类型被定义为对特定行为(例如,睡眠和醒来)在一天中特定时间发生的偏好。因此,它也与一天中的认知表现有暂时的联系。在一项探索性分析中,我们试图发现自我报告的习惯性睡眠时间和唾液褪黑素在两回工作记忆任务中与精神努力之间的联系。精神努力被运作为对心脏的交感-肾上腺素能影响,这在心脏射血前期(PEP)中得到最好的反映,也影响收缩压(SBP)。每个参与者在早上进行两次实验:一次是在睡了8小时后,一次是在前一天晚上睡了5小时后。为了确定褪黑素在晚上起作用的时间,参与者在实验开始之前,每隔一小时在家里采集一次唾液样本。根据慕尼黑睡眠类型问卷报告的睡眠时间和两种睡眠状态下褪黑素的平均分泌量来确定睡眠类型。在此基础上,参与者被分为早期、中期和晚期。警觉性(BF10 = 0.019)、感知任务需求(BF10 = 0.008)和收缩压反应(BF10 = 0.268)均不受睡眠时间衍生时型的影响,而与早晨认知挑战时PEP反应(BF10 = 0.631)的关系尚无定论。同样,在认知挑战期间,夜间褪黑激素的发作时间并不影响警觉性(BF10 = 0.003)、感知任务需求(BF10 = 0.006)或PEP或SBP反应(PEP: BF10 = 0.232, SBP: BF10 = 0.263)。我们的数据显示,在早晨的认知挑战中,生物钟类型对与努力相关的心血管反应没有影响,这是根据习惯睡眠时间安排的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
No association between chronotype and cardiovascular response to a cognitive challenge in the morning using a Bayesian approach
A chronotype is defined as a preference for certain behaviours (e.g., sleep and wake) to occur at specific times of day. It is therefore also temporally linked with cognitive performance across the day. In an exploratory analysis, we sought to find associations between chronotypes determined from self-reported habitual sleep timing and from salivary melatonin onset with mental effort during a 2-back working memory task. Mental effort was operationalized as sympathetic beta-adrenergic impact on the heart, which is best reflected by the cardiac pre-ejection period (PEP) and also influences systolic blood pressure (SBP). Each participant underwent two experimental sessions in the morning: once after sleeping for 8 h and once after sleeping for 5 h the night before. To determine the timing of evening melatonin onset, participants took saliva samples at hourly intervals at home in the evening, prior to their experimental sessions. Chronotypes were determined using reported sleep times from the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire and average melatonin onset during both sleep conditions. Based on this, participants were grouped into early, intermediate, or late types. Neither alertness (BF10 = 0.019), perceived task demand (BF10 = 0.008), nor SBP response (BF10 = 0.268) were credibly impacted by sleep-time derived chronotype, while the association with PEP response (BF10 = 0.631) during a cognitive challenge in the morning was inconclusive. Similarly, the timing of evening melatonin onset did not affect alertness (BF10 = 0.003), perceived task demand (BF10 = 0.006), or PEP or SBP response (PEP: BF10 = 0.232, SBP: BF10 = 0.263) during the cognitive challenge. Our data shows no impact of chronotypes on effort-related cardiovascular response during a cognitive challenge in the morning, which was scheduled according to habitual sleep times.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurobiology of Sleep and Circadian Rhythms
Neurobiology of Sleep and Circadian Rhythms Neuroscience-Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Neurobiology of Sleep and Circadian Rhythms is a multidisciplinary journal for the publication of original research and review articles on basic and translational research into sleep and circadian rhythms. The journal focuses on topics covering the mechanisms of sleep/wake and circadian regulation from molecular to systems level, and on the functional consequences of sleep and circadian disruption. A key aim of the journal is the translation of basic research findings to understand and treat sleep and circadian disorders. Topics include, but are not limited to: Basic and translational research, Molecular mechanisms, Genetics and epigenetics, Inflammation and immunology, Memory and learning, Neurological and neurodegenerative diseases, Neuropsychopharmacology and neuroendocrinology, Behavioral sleep and circadian disorders, Shiftwork, Social jetlag.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信