“无效,驳回或最小化:”VHA心理健康提供者的工作经历和倦怠的性别差异:一项混合方法研究

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Kara Zivin , Molly Harrod , Linda Takamine , Brittany R. Porath , Jennifer Burgess , Hyungin Myra Kim , Veronica Ortolan , Kristen M. Abraham , Rebecca K. Sripada
{"title":"“无效,驳回或最小化:”VHA心理健康提供者的工作经历和倦怠的性别差异:一项混合方法研究","authors":"Kara Zivin ,&nbsp;Molly Harrod ,&nbsp;Linda Takamine ,&nbsp;Brittany R. Porath ,&nbsp;Jennifer Burgess ,&nbsp;Hyungin Myra Kim ,&nbsp;Veronica Ortolan ,&nbsp;Kristen M. Abraham ,&nbsp;Rebecca K. Sripada","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Burnout negatively affects clinicians nationwide, with elevated levels among mental health providers (MHPs) in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Female providers bear a disproportionate burden. We sought <strong>t</strong>o examine contextual circumstances affecting workplace experiences and burnout among MHPs and differences by sex. Employing a convergent mixed methods design, we explored factors contributing to negative workplace experiences among MHPs (psychiatrists, psychologists, and social workers) using 2022 VHA All Employee Survey (AES) data and MHP interviews (2021–2022). Our analysis included 14,265 2022 AES responses from MHPs (72.1 % female) and 51 interviews, (66.7 % female). A higher proportion of females reported burnout (42.71 % of females, 40.18 % of males). Among other AES workplace items, females were less likely to report no supervisor favoritism, fair conflict resolution, supervisors addressing their concerns, and performance recognition (effect estimates ranged from −0.05 to −0.18). Qualitative findings complemented quantitative findings: females were less comfortable advocating for themselves and setting “hard boundaries” regarding workload. Females reported more disrespect from coworkers than their male colleagues, and in some cases reported outright discrimination. Reflecting the broader social context, females reported a variety of ways in which sexism pervaded the organization and contributed to burnout. Our findings highlighted multiple ways in which female MHPs experienced higher levels of burnout, less positive workplace experiences, and more challenges advocating for themselves. These findings identify targets for system-level improvements that could address burnout among all employees and those unique to female employees. Downstream, these opportunities could lead to a healthier, consistent workforce and improved patient care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100559"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Invalidated, dismissed, or minimized:” sex differences in workplace experiences and burnout among VHA mental health providers: A mixed methods study\",\"authors\":\"Kara Zivin ,&nbsp;Molly Harrod ,&nbsp;Linda Takamine ,&nbsp;Brittany R. Porath ,&nbsp;Jennifer Burgess ,&nbsp;Hyungin Myra Kim ,&nbsp;Veronica Ortolan ,&nbsp;Kristen M. Abraham ,&nbsp;Rebecca K. Sripada\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100559\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Burnout negatively affects clinicians nationwide, with elevated levels among mental health providers (MHPs) in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Female providers bear a disproportionate burden. We sought <strong>t</strong>o examine contextual circumstances affecting workplace experiences and burnout among MHPs and differences by sex. Employing a convergent mixed methods design, we explored factors contributing to negative workplace experiences among MHPs (psychiatrists, psychologists, and social workers) using 2022 VHA All Employee Survey (AES) data and MHP interviews (2021–2022). Our analysis included 14,265 2022 AES responses from MHPs (72.1 % female) and 51 interviews, (66.7 % female). A higher proportion of females reported burnout (42.71 % of females, 40.18 % of males). Among other AES workplace items, females were less likely to report no supervisor favoritism, fair conflict resolution, supervisors addressing their concerns, and performance recognition (effect estimates ranged from −0.05 to −0.18). Qualitative findings complemented quantitative findings: females were less comfortable advocating for themselves and setting “hard boundaries” regarding workload. Females reported more disrespect from coworkers than their male colleagues, and in some cases reported outright discrimination. Reflecting the broader social context, females reported a variety of ways in which sexism pervaded the organization and contributed to burnout. Our findings highlighted multiple ways in which female MHPs experienced higher levels of burnout, less positive workplace experiences, and more challenges advocating for themselves. These findings identify targets for system-level improvements that could address burnout among all employees and those unique to female employees. Downstream, these opportunities could lead to a healthier, consistent workforce and improved patient care.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SSM. Qualitative research in health\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100559\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SSM. Qualitative research in health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266732152500037X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266732152500037X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

职业倦怠对全国的临床医生产生负面影响,退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)的心理健康提供者(MHPs)的职业倦怠水平升高。女性提供者承担着不成比例的负担。我们试图研究影响职场经验和职业倦怠的背景环境,以及性别差异。采用融合混合方法设计,我们利用2022年VHA所有员工调查(AES)数据和2021-2022年MHP访谈,探讨了影响MHPs(精神病学家、心理学家和社会工作者)负面工作体验的因素。我们的分析包括来自MHPs的14,265份2022年AES回复(72.1%为女性)和51次访谈(66.7%为女性)。女性的倦怠比例较高(女性为42.71%,男性为40.18%)。在其他AES工作场所项目中,女性不太可能报告没有上司偏袒、公平解决冲突、上司解决她们的问题和绩效认可(效应估计范围从- 0.05到- 0.18)。定性调查结果补充了定量调查结果:女性不太愿意为自己辩护,也不太愿意为工作量设定“硬界限”。与男同事相比,女性更容易受到同事的不尊重,在某些情况下还会受到直接的歧视。反映了更广泛的社会背景,女性报告了性别歧视在组织中蔓延的各种方式,并导致了倦怠。我们的研究结果强调了女性mhp在多个方面经历了更高程度的倦怠,更少积极的工作经历,以及更多的自我宣传挑战。这些发现确定了系统级改进的目标,可以解决所有员工和女性员工特有的倦怠问题。在下游,这些机会可能会带来更健康、更稳定的劳动力,并改善患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Invalidated, dismissed, or minimized:” sex differences in workplace experiences and burnout among VHA mental health providers: A mixed methods study
Burnout negatively affects clinicians nationwide, with elevated levels among mental health providers (MHPs) in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Female providers bear a disproportionate burden. We sought to examine contextual circumstances affecting workplace experiences and burnout among MHPs and differences by sex. Employing a convergent mixed methods design, we explored factors contributing to negative workplace experiences among MHPs (psychiatrists, psychologists, and social workers) using 2022 VHA All Employee Survey (AES) data and MHP interviews (2021–2022). Our analysis included 14,265 2022 AES responses from MHPs (72.1 % female) and 51 interviews, (66.7 % female). A higher proportion of females reported burnout (42.71 % of females, 40.18 % of males). Among other AES workplace items, females were less likely to report no supervisor favoritism, fair conflict resolution, supervisors addressing their concerns, and performance recognition (effect estimates ranged from −0.05 to −0.18). Qualitative findings complemented quantitative findings: females were less comfortable advocating for themselves and setting “hard boundaries” regarding workload. Females reported more disrespect from coworkers than their male colleagues, and in some cases reported outright discrimination. Reflecting the broader social context, females reported a variety of ways in which sexism pervaded the organization and contributed to burnout. Our findings highlighted multiple ways in which female MHPs experienced higher levels of burnout, less positive workplace experiences, and more challenges advocating for themselves. These findings identify targets for system-level improvements that could address burnout among all employees and those unique to female employees. Downstream, these opportunities could lead to a healthier, consistent workforce and improved patient care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
163 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信