{"title":"单独施肥并不能保证糖枫再生的成功","authors":"Jean-David Moore, Rock Ouimet","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sugar maple (SM; <em>Acer saccharum</em> Marshall) is considered to have a high economical and ecological value in northeastern North America. Over the last few decades, dieback and regeneration failure have posed a threat to its sustainability, particularly in acidic and base-poor soils. We evaluated the status of lower regeneration and dominant regeneration in a base-poor northern hardwood stand in Québec, 20 years after a liming treatment. Liming radically increased the density of lower regeneration and the proportion of SM in this stratum, up to levels more than 7 times those of control plots for the highest doses. Dominant regeneration consisted of only 4 % SM (all in the limed plots), while 85 % was American beech (AB; <em>Fagus grandifolia</em> Ehrh.). However, liming had no statistically significant effect on the composition of dominant regeneration, and no effect or a negative effect on the diameter and height of SM and AB regeneration. This can probably be explained by competition for light and nutrients resulting from a greater regeneration density and canopy closure in response to lime application. Results show that 20 years after its application in an acidic and base-poor northern hardwood stand, a single lime addition can contribute to increasing the proportion of SM at the lower regeneration stage. However, sylvicultural treatments must be considered to ensure that SM lower regeneration reaches a more advanced stratum in the stand.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"590 ","pages":"Article 122809"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liming alone does not guarantee the success of sugar maple regeneration\",\"authors\":\"Jean-David Moore, Rock Ouimet\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.122809\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Sugar maple (SM; <em>Acer saccharum</em> Marshall) is considered to have a high economical and ecological value in northeastern North America. Over the last few decades, dieback and regeneration failure have posed a threat to its sustainability, particularly in acidic and base-poor soils. We evaluated the status of lower regeneration and dominant regeneration in a base-poor northern hardwood stand in Québec, 20 years after a liming treatment. Liming radically increased the density of lower regeneration and the proportion of SM in this stratum, up to levels more than 7 times those of control plots for the highest doses. Dominant regeneration consisted of only 4 % SM (all in the limed plots), while 85 % was American beech (AB; <em>Fagus grandifolia</em> Ehrh.). However, liming had no statistically significant effect on the composition of dominant regeneration, and no effect or a negative effect on the diameter and height of SM and AB regeneration. This can probably be explained by competition for light and nutrients resulting from a greater regeneration density and canopy closure in response to lime application. Results show that 20 years after its application in an acidic and base-poor northern hardwood stand, a single lime addition can contribute to increasing the proportion of SM at the lower regeneration stage. However, sylvicultural treatments must be considered to ensure that SM lower regeneration reaches a more advanced stratum in the stand.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Ecology and Management\",\"volume\":\"590 \",\"pages\":\"Article 122809\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Ecology and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725003172\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725003172","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Liming alone does not guarantee the success of sugar maple regeneration
Sugar maple (SM; Acer saccharum Marshall) is considered to have a high economical and ecological value in northeastern North America. Over the last few decades, dieback and regeneration failure have posed a threat to its sustainability, particularly in acidic and base-poor soils. We evaluated the status of lower regeneration and dominant regeneration in a base-poor northern hardwood stand in Québec, 20 years after a liming treatment. Liming radically increased the density of lower regeneration and the proportion of SM in this stratum, up to levels more than 7 times those of control plots for the highest doses. Dominant regeneration consisted of only 4 % SM (all in the limed plots), while 85 % was American beech (AB; Fagus grandifolia Ehrh.). However, liming had no statistically significant effect on the composition of dominant regeneration, and no effect or a negative effect on the diameter and height of SM and AB regeneration. This can probably be explained by competition for light and nutrients resulting from a greater regeneration density and canopy closure in response to lime application. Results show that 20 years after its application in an acidic and base-poor northern hardwood stand, a single lime addition can contribute to increasing the proportion of SM at the lower regeneration stage. However, sylvicultural treatments must be considered to ensure that SM lower regeneration reaches a more advanced stratum in the stand.
期刊介绍:
Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world.
A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers.
We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include:
1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests;
2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management;
3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023);
4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript.
The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.