探索工艺空间:陶器生产考古学的新见解

IF 1.5 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Claire Padovani , Julie Flahaut , Sonja Willems
{"title":"探索工艺空间:陶器生产考古学的新见解","authors":"Claire Padovani ,&nbsp;Julie Flahaut ,&nbsp;Sonja Willems","doi":"10.1016/j.jasrep.2025.105183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The theoretical and methodological framework for studying craft spaces remains significantly underdeveloped compared with other types of functional areas, such as domestic, religious, and political spaces, which have been extensively documented across various regions and time periods. Specifically, pottery production has usually been studied from a top-down oriented approach, in the frame of political economy. This perspective contributed to a general lack of scholarly focus and field documentation of production areas. It reflects a paradigmatic issue regarding the perceived informational value of these areas. The core challenge, and at the same time the key motivation, of developing an archaeology of artisanal spaces lies in the absence of a universally accepted definition of the “potter’s workshop” (Costin, 2020). Scholars focusing across diverse cultural contexts often employ distinct terminologies and conceptual frameworks to interpret workshop remains. This special issue seeks to bring together different chrono-cultural perspectives and to propose fresh research directions and interpretation on pottery craft spaces. Some of the papers in this special issue were presented at the international workshop organised on 9 December 2022 at Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne by C. Padovani, J. Flahaut and S. Willems (<span><span>https://archeorient.hypotheses.org/29294</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</div><div>The objective of this special issue is to expand on the groundwork laid by previous researchers (Duistermaat, 2008; Hasaki, 2011; Denti and Villette, 2019) in studying pottery craft spaces – not merely as contexts for interpretation but as meaningful socio-cultural elements for understanding ancient societies. Each element of the potter’s workshops provides information on the techniques and labour organisation of each potter and their group, as well as on the deeper socio-economic structure of their society.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","volume":"64 ","pages":"Article 105183"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring craft spaces: A new insight into the archaeology of pottery production\",\"authors\":\"Claire Padovani ,&nbsp;Julie Flahaut ,&nbsp;Sonja Willems\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jasrep.2025.105183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The theoretical and methodological framework for studying craft spaces remains significantly underdeveloped compared with other types of functional areas, such as domestic, religious, and political spaces, which have been extensively documented across various regions and time periods. Specifically, pottery production has usually been studied from a top-down oriented approach, in the frame of political economy. This perspective contributed to a general lack of scholarly focus and field documentation of production areas. It reflects a paradigmatic issue regarding the perceived informational value of these areas. The core challenge, and at the same time the key motivation, of developing an archaeology of artisanal spaces lies in the absence of a universally accepted definition of the “potter’s workshop” (Costin, 2020). Scholars focusing across diverse cultural contexts often employ distinct terminologies and conceptual frameworks to interpret workshop remains. This special issue seeks to bring together different chrono-cultural perspectives and to propose fresh research directions and interpretation on pottery craft spaces. Some of the papers in this special issue were presented at the international workshop organised on 9 December 2022 at Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne by C. Padovani, J. Flahaut and S. Willems (<span><span>https://archeorient.hypotheses.org/29294</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>).</div><div>The objective of this special issue is to expand on the groundwork laid by previous researchers (Duistermaat, 2008; Hasaki, 2011; Denti and Villette, 2019) in studying pottery craft spaces – not merely as contexts for interpretation but as meaningful socio-cultural elements for understanding ancient societies. Each element of the potter’s workshops provides information on the techniques and labour organisation of each potter and their group, as well as on the deeper socio-economic structure of their society.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports\",\"volume\":\"64 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105183\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X25002160\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X25002160","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与其他类型的功能区(如家庭、宗教和政治空间)相比,研究工艺空间的理论和方法框架仍然明显不发达,这些功能区在不同地区和时期都有广泛的记录。具体来说,陶器生产通常是在政治经济学的框架下从自上而下的方法来研究的。这种观点导致普遍缺乏学术焦点和生产领域的实地文件。它反映了一个关于这些领域的感知信息价值的范例问题。开发手工空间考古学的核心挑战,同时也是关键动机,在于缺乏普遍接受的“陶工作坊”定义(Costin, 2020)。关注不同文化背景的学者经常使用不同的术语和概念框架来解释车间遗迹。本期特刊旨在汇集不同的年代文化视角,对陶艺工艺空间提出新的研究方向和解读。本期特刊中的一些论文于2022年12月9日在巴黎1 panth索邦大学由C. padvani, J. Flahaut和S. Willems组织的国际研讨会上发表(https://archeorient.hypotheses.org/29294).The本期特刊的目的是扩展以前研究人员奠定的基础(Duistermaat, 2008;Hasaki, 2011;Denti和Villette, 2019)研究陶器工艺空间——不仅作为解释的背景,而且作为理解古代社会的有意义的社会文化元素。陶工车间的每个要素都提供了每个陶工及其群体的技术和劳动组织的信息,以及他们社会的更深层次的社会经济结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring craft spaces: A new insight into the archaeology of pottery production
The theoretical and methodological framework for studying craft spaces remains significantly underdeveloped compared with other types of functional areas, such as domestic, religious, and political spaces, which have been extensively documented across various regions and time periods. Specifically, pottery production has usually been studied from a top-down oriented approach, in the frame of political economy. This perspective contributed to a general lack of scholarly focus and field documentation of production areas. It reflects a paradigmatic issue regarding the perceived informational value of these areas. The core challenge, and at the same time the key motivation, of developing an archaeology of artisanal spaces lies in the absence of a universally accepted definition of the “potter’s workshop” (Costin, 2020). Scholars focusing across diverse cultural contexts often employ distinct terminologies and conceptual frameworks to interpret workshop remains. This special issue seeks to bring together different chrono-cultural perspectives and to propose fresh research directions and interpretation on pottery craft spaces. Some of the papers in this special issue were presented at the international workshop organised on 9 December 2022 at Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne by C. Padovani, J. Flahaut and S. Willems (https://archeorient.hypotheses.org/29294).
The objective of this special issue is to expand on the groundwork laid by previous researchers (Duistermaat, 2008; Hasaki, 2011; Denti and Villette, 2019) in studying pottery craft spaces – not merely as contexts for interpretation but as meaningful socio-cultural elements for understanding ancient societies. Each element of the potter’s workshops provides information on the techniques and labour organisation of each potter and their group, as well as on the deeper socio-economic structure of their society.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
405
期刊介绍: Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports is aimed at archaeologists and scientists engaged with the application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. The journal focuses on the results of the application of scientific methods to archaeological problems and debates. It will provide a forum for reviews and scientific debate of issues in scientific archaeology and their impact in the wider subject. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports will publish papers of excellent archaeological science, with regional or wider interest. This will include case studies, reviews and short papers where an established scientific technique sheds light on archaeological questions and debates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信