Pengcheng Wang , Rucheng Lu , Tongsheng Fan , Liguo Zhang , Xin Nong
{"title":"边界生态系统服务与风险的综合优化:考虑过去与未来的多尺度探索","authors":"Pengcheng Wang , Rucheng Lu , Tongsheng Fan , Liguo Zhang , Xin Nong","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The global ecological environment is undergoing a systemic crisis driven by the combined effects of accelerated urbanization and climate change, with the ecosystem imbalance exceeding planetary boundary threshold. Border regions, serving as the frontline for national security, remain understudied, with insufficient research on ecosystem security simulations. This study takes the Yunnan-Guangxi region of China's land border (YGCB) as a case study, coupling a series of regional disparity and spatiotemporal mapping models to identify and simulate ecosystem services and risks across multiple scales, thereby establishing a comprehensive optimization framework for ecological security zones. The results indicate that: (1) The ecosystem services and risks in the YGCB exhibited spatiotemporal heterogeneity and regional interactions. The ecosystem service index (ESI) initially increased but later declined, dropping from 0.3775 in 1990 to 0.3769. The ecosystem risk index (ERI) rose to 0.4063 by 2020. The spatiotemporal trade-off relationship between ESI and ERI revealed the coupled effects of karst terrain sensitivity and human activities in the cross-border economic zone. (2) Significant variations exist in border ecological security across different development scenarios. Under the integrated optimization of security stabilization scenarios, ecosystem service capacity is markedly improved, showing a 6.22 % increase compared to 2020 levels, while ecosystem risks are effectively mitigated with a 37.88 % reduction from 2020 baselines. (3) As the core zones of geo-economic and social development in the YGCB, the border trade ports and central towns remain critical regions requiring focused attention and governance in the systematic engineering of border ecological protection. Therefore, the establishment of a Global Border Eco-Security Network is called for to analyze ecosystem service-risk interactions across borders, scales, and elements, systematically addressing the “protection-development” challenge.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 107986"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrated optimization of border ecosystem services and risks: A multiscale exploration considering the past and future\",\"authors\":\"Pengcheng Wang , Rucheng Lu , Tongsheng Fan , Liguo Zhang , Xin Nong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107986\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The global ecological environment is undergoing a systemic crisis driven by the combined effects of accelerated urbanization and climate change, with the ecosystem imbalance exceeding planetary boundary threshold. Border regions, serving as the frontline for national security, remain understudied, with insufficient research on ecosystem security simulations. This study takes the Yunnan-Guangxi region of China's land border (YGCB) as a case study, coupling a series of regional disparity and spatiotemporal mapping models to identify and simulate ecosystem services and risks across multiple scales, thereby establishing a comprehensive optimization framework for ecological security zones. The results indicate that: (1) The ecosystem services and risks in the YGCB exhibited spatiotemporal heterogeneity and regional interactions. The ecosystem service index (ESI) initially increased but later declined, dropping from 0.3775 in 1990 to 0.3769. The ecosystem risk index (ERI) rose to 0.4063 by 2020. The spatiotemporal trade-off relationship between ESI and ERI revealed the coupled effects of karst terrain sensitivity and human activities in the cross-border economic zone. (2) Significant variations exist in border ecological security across different development scenarios. Under the integrated optimization of security stabilization scenarios, ecosystem service capacity is markedly improved, showing a 6.22 % increase compared to 2020 levels, while ecosystem risks are effectively mitigated with a 37.88 % reduction from 2020 baselines. (3) As the core zones of geo-economic and social development in the YGCB, the border trade ports and central towns remain critical regions requiring focused attention and governance in the systematic engineering of border ecological protection. Therefore, the establishment of a Global Border Eco-Security Network is called for to analyze ecosystem service-risk interactions across borders, scales, and elements, systematically addressing the “protection-development” challenge.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"volume\":\"115 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107986\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525001830\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525001830","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Integrated optimization of border ecosystem services and risks: A multiscale exploration considering the past and future
The global ecological environment is undergoing a systemic crisis driven by the combined effects of accelerated urbanization and climate change, with the ecosystem imbalance exceeding planetary boundary threshold. Border regions, serving as the frontline for national security, remain understudied, with insufficient research on ecosystem security simulations. This study takes the Yunnan-Guangxi region of China's land border (YGCB) as a case study, coupling a series of regional disparity and spatiotemporal mapping models to identify and simulate ecosystem services and risks across multiple scales, thereby establishing a comprehensive optimization framework for ecological security zones. The results indicate that: (1) The ecosystem services and risks in the YGCB exhibited spatiotemporal heterogeneity and regional interactions. The ecosystem service index (ESI) initially increased but later declined, dropping from 0.3775 in 1990 to 0.3769. The ecosystem risk index (ERI) rose to 0.4063 by 2020. The spatiotemporal trade-off relationship between ESI and ERI revealed the coupled effects of karst terrain sensitivity and human activities in the cross-border economic zone. (2) Significant variations exist in border ecological security across different development scenarios. Under the integrated optimization of security stabilization scenarios, ecosystem service capacity is markedly improved, showing a 6.22 % increase compared to 2020 levels, while ecosystem risks are effectively mitigated with a 37.88 % reduction from 2020 baselines. (3) As the core zones of geo-economic and social development in the YGCB, the border trade ports and central towns remain critical regions requiring focused attention and governance in the systematic engineering of border ecological protection. Therefore, the establishment of a Global Border Eco-Security Network is called for to analyze ecosystem service-risk interactions across borders, scales, and elements, systematically addressing the “protection-development” challenge.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.