{"title":"局部镇痛花椒治疗原发性膝骨关节炎的疗效:一项随机、双盲、阳性对照临床试验","authors":"Chureeporn Imphat , Nanthakarn Woottisin , Wiwat Chiewsilp","doi":"10.1016/j.jaim.2024.101108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The essential oil from the pericarp (EOP) of <em>Zanthoxylum rhetsa</em> (Roxb.) DC. inhibits prostaglandin E<sub>2</sub>, which is related to knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, there is no clinical report on its efficacy.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To assess the efficacy of EOP in <em>Z. rhetsa</em> (ZR) spray as a novel spray compared to diclofenac (DF) spray in elderly individuals diagnosed with primary knee OA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>60 patients with unilateral knee pain over three months were randomly assigned to either the ZR spray (experimental) or DF spray (control) group. Each group applied the spray topically 3 times daily (2 mL each time) for 14 consecutive days. Follow-ups occurred after day 7 and after day 14. Primary outcomes included pain score measurements, with secondary outcomes focusing on WOMAC index scores.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The ZR and DF spray groups did not significantly differ at baseline. ZR spray is the first to demonstrate non-inferior efficacy compared to DF spray, with no significant difference in the mean change of pain scores at rest after 10 min (effect size <0.2) and following a 20-m walk test (effect size <0.5), including walking time (effect size <0.2), as well as in WOMAC index scores (effect size <0.3) from baseline to the first and second visits. Additionally, patients treated with ZR spray required less oral medication from the first visit.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Analgesia and improved knee functionality provided by ZR spray are suitable for combined treatment in elderly patients with co-morbidities or limited oral NSAID medication due to increased risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine","volume":"16 3","pages":"Article 101108"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of topical analgesia Zanthoxylum rhetsa in the treatment of primary knee osteoarthritis: A randomized, double-blind, positive-controlled clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"Chureeporn Imphat , Nanthakarn Woottisin , Wiwat Chiewsilp\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaim.2024.101108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The essential oil from the pericarp (EOP) of <em>Zanthoxylum rhetsa</em> (Roxb.) DC. inhibits prostaglandin E<sub>2</sub>, which is related to knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, there is no clinical report on its efficacy.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To assess the efficacy of EOP in <em>Z. rhetsa</em> (ZR) spray as a novel spray compared to diclofenac (DF) spray in elderly individuals diagnosed with primary knee OA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>60 patients with unilateral knee pain over three months were randomly assigned to either the ZR spray (experimental) or DF spray (control) group. Each group applied the spray topically 3 times daily (2 mL each time) for 14 consecutive days. Follow-ups occurred after day 7 and after day 14. Primary outcomes included pain score measurements, with secondary outcomes focusing on WOMAC index scores.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The ZR and DF spray groups did not significantly differ at baseline. ZR spray is the first to demonstrate non-inferior efficacy compared to DF spray, with no significant difference in the mean change of pain scores at rest after 10 min (effect size <0.2) and following a 20-m walk test (effect size <0.5), including walking time (effect size <0.2), as well as in WOMAC index scores (effect size <0.3) from baseline to the first and second visits. Additionally, patients treated with ZR spray required less oral medication from the first visit.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Analgesia and improved knee functionality provided by ZR spray are suitable for combined treatment in elderly patients with co-morbidities or limited oral NSAID medication due to increased risk.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0975947624002237\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0975947624002237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy of topical analgesia Zanthoxylum rhetsa in the treatment of primary knee osteoarthritis: A randomized, double-blind, positive-controlled clinical trial
Background
The essential oil from the pericarp (EOP) of Zanthoxylum rhetsa (Roxb.) DC. inhibits prostaglandin E2, which is related to knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, there is no clinical report on its efficacy.
Objectives
To assess the efficacy of EOP in Z. rhetsa (ZR) spray as a novel spray compared to diclofenac (DF) spray in elderly individuals diagnosed with primary knee OA.
Methods
60 patients with unilateral knee pain over three months were randomly assigned to either the ZR spray (experimental) or DF spray (control) group. Each group applied the spray topically 3 times daily (2 mL each time) for 14 consecutive days. Follow-ups occurred after day 7 and after day 14. Primary outcomes included pain score measurements, with secondary outcomes focusing on WOMAC index scores.
Results
The ZR and DF spray groups did not significantly differ at baseline. ZR spray is the first to demonstrate non-inferior efficacy compared to DF spray, with no significant difference in the mean change of pain scores at rest after 10 min (effect size <0.2) and following a 20-m walk test (effect size <0.5), including walking time (effect size <0.2), as well as in WOMAC index scores (effect size <0.3) from baseline to the first and second visits. Additionally, patients treated with ZR spray required less oral medication from the first visit.
Conclusions
Analgesia and improved knee functionality provided by ZR spray are suitable for combined treatment in elderly patients with co-morbidities or limited oral NSAID medication due to increased risk.