138日粮亮氨酸对25-50 kg豆粕或玉米发酵蛋白生长猪日粮色氨酸需取量的影响

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Andrea Paola P Mallea Ortiz, Hans H Stein
{"title":"138日粮亮氨酸对25-50 kg豆粕或玉米发酵蛋白生长猪日粮色氨酸需取量的影响","authors":"Andrea Paola P Mallea Ortiz, Hans H Stein","doi":"10.1093/jas/skaf102.113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An experiment was conducted to test the hypothesis that the optimum Trp:Lys ratio in diets for growing pigs is greater if corn fermented protein (CFP) rather than soybean meal (SBM) is used as the protein source in the diets. Two basal diets based on corn and SBM or corn and CFP were formulated. Both diets contained 0.90% SID Lys and both diets had a standardized ileal digestible (SID) Trp:Lys ratio of 10% (i.e., 60% of the requirement). All other indispensable amino acids were included at or above the requirement in both basal diets. Eight additional diets were formulated by adding crystalline L-Trp to both basal diets to generate diets with 14, 17, 20, or 24% SID Trp:Lys ratio for each protein source. Therefore, there were five SID Trp:Lys ratios for each protein source. A total of 320 growing pigs with an initial body weight (BW) of 25.53 ± 2.85 kg were randomly allotted to one of the 10 dietary treatments and fed experimental diets for 28 d. On day 1 and 28, a blood sample, which was analyzed for blood urea nitrogen (BUN), was collected from the jugular vein of one barrow in each pen. Data were analyzed by linear and quadratic contrasts in SAS (Inst. Inc. Cary, NC, USA). The optimal SID Trp:Lys ratio was estimated using linear broken-line and quadratic broken-line regressions for average daily gain (ADG) and BUN, using the NLIN procedure in SAS. A Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to determine if the requirement estimates for CFP or SBM were different. Results indicated that pigs fed the corn-SBM diets had greater (P < 0.05) final BW, ADG, average daily feed intake, gain to feed ratio, and daily Trp intake than pigs fed corn-CFP diets (Table 1). On d 28, BUN decreased (linear and quadratic, P < 0.05) as the SID Trp:Lys ratio increased regardless of protein source. For pigs fed the SBM diets, combined broken-line quadratic analyses estimated the optimum SID Trp:Lys requirement as 18.95 and 15.54% for ADG and BUN, respectively, but for pigs fed the CFP-based diets, the optimum SID Trp:Lys requirement were 20.51 and 15.65% for ADG and BUN, respectively. The average SID Trp:Lys ratio for the two measurements was 18.08 and 17.24% for CFP and SBM, respectively. These values were not different (Table 2), and under the conditions of this experiment, the requirement for Trp was not different in diets based on CFP compared with diets based on SBM. Therefore, the hypothesis for the experiment was rejected. In conclusion, pigs fed diets based on CFP rather than SBM have reduced growth performance, but the main reason for this does not appear to be a deficiency of Trp.","PeriodicalId":14895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of animal science","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"138 Effect of dietary leucine on the tryptophan requirement in diets for 25-50 kg growing pigs fed soybean meal or corn fermented protein\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Paola P Mallea Ortiz, Hans H Stein\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jas/skaf102.113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An experiment was conducted to test the hypothesis that the optimum Trp:Lys ratio in diets for growing pigs is greater if corn fermented protein (CFP) rather than soybean meal (SBM) is used as the protein source in the diets. Two basal diets based on corn and SBM or corn and CFP were formulated. Both diets contained 0.90% SID Lys and both diets had a standardized ileal digestible (SID) Trp:Lys ratio of 10% (i.e., 60% of the requirement). All other indispensable amino acids were included at or above the requirement in both basal diets. Eight additional diets were formulated by adding crystalline L-Trp to both basal diets to generate diets with 14, 17, 20, or 24% SID Trp:Lys ratio for each protein source. Therefore, there were five SID Trp:Lys ratios for each protein source. A total of 320 growing pigs with an initial body weight (BW) of 25.53 ± 2.85 kg were randomly allotted to one of the 10 dietary treatments and fed experimental diets for 28 d. On day 1 and 28, a blood sample, which was analyzed for blood urea nitrogen (BUN), was collected from the jugular vein of one barrow in each pen. Data were analyzed by linear and quadratic contrasts in SAS (Inst. Inc. Cary, NC, USA). The optimal SID Trp:Lys ratio was estimated using linear broken-line and quadratic broken-line regressions for average daily gain (ADG) and BUN, using the NLIN procedure in SAS. A Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to determine if the requirement estimates for CFP or SBM were different. Results indicated that pigs fed the corn-SBM diets had greater (P < 0.05) final BW, ADG, average daily feed intake, gain to feed ratio, and daily Trp intake than pigs fed corn-CFP diets (Table 1). On d 28, BUN decreased (linear and quadratic, P < 0.05) as the SID Trp:Lys ratio increased regardless of protein source. For pigs fed the SBM diets, combined broken-line quadratic analyses estimated the optimum SID Trp:Lys requirement as 18.95 and 15.54% for ADG and BUN, respectively, but for pigs fed the CFP-based diets, the optimum SID Trp:Lys requirement were 20.51 and 15.65% for ADG and BUN, respectively. The average SID Trp:Lys ratio for the two measurements was 18.08 and 17.24% for CFP and SBM, respectively. These values were not different (Table 2), and under the conditions of this experiment, the requirement for Trp was not different in diets based on CFP compared with diets based on SBM. Therefore, the hypothesis for the experiment was rejected. In conclusion, pigs fed diets based on CFP rather than SBM have reduced growth performance, but the main reason for this does not appear to be a deficiency of Trp.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of animal science\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of animal science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf102.113\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of animal science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf102.113","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本试验旨在验证以玉米发酵蛋白(CFP)而非豆粕(SBM)为蛋白质源的生长猪饲粮中最佳色氨酸:赖氨酸比更高的假设。试验配制了以玉米+ SBM或玉米+ CFP为基础的2种饲粮。两种饲粮的赖氨酸含量均为0.90%,两种饲粮的标准回肠可消化(SID)色氨酸:赖氨酸比率均为10%(即需取量的60%)。其余必需氨基酸均达到或高于两种基础日粮的需要量。通过在基础饲粮中添加结晶l -色氨酸,配制出8种额外的饲粮,每种蛋白质源的SID -色氨酸:赖氨酸比例分别为14%、17%、20%和24%。因此,每种蛋白质源有5个SID、Trp:Lys比值。试验选取320头初始体重为25.53±2.85 kg的生长猪,随机分为10个饲粮处理,分别饲喂试验饲粮28 d。在第1天和第28天,每个猪圈各取一个猪舍颈静脉采血,分析血尿素氮(BUN)含量。采用SAS (institute . Inc.)的线性对比和二次对比分析数据。加里,北卡罗来纳州,美国)。采用SAS的NLIN方法,利用平均日增重(ADG)和BUN的线性折线和二次折线回归估计SID的最佳色氨酸:赖氨酸比率。使用Wilcoxon秩和检验来确定CFP或SBM的需求估计是否不同。结果表明,饲喂玉米- sbm日粮的猪具有较高的P &;0.05)末体重、平均日增重、平均日采食量、料重比和日色氨酸采食量均高于玉米- cfp饲粮(表1)。第28天,BUN呈线性和二次型下降,P <;无论蛋白质来源如何,SID的Trp:Lys比值均升高。对饲喂SBM饲粮的猪,综合折线二次分析得出ADG和BUN的最佳SID Trp:Lys需取量分别为18.95和15.54%,而饲喂cfp饲粮的ADG和BUN的最佳SID Trp:Lys需取量分别为20.51和15.65%。CFP和SBM的平均SID Trp:Lys比值分别为18.08和17.24%。这些数值没有差异(表2),在本试验条件下,CFP饲粮对色氨酸的需取量与SBM饲粮对色氨酸的需取量没有差异。因此,实验的假设被拒绝。综上所述,饲粮中添加CFP而非SBM会降低猪的生长性能,但其主要原因似乎不是色氨酸缺乏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
138 Effect of dietary leucine on the tryptophan requirement in diets for 25-50 kg growing pigs fed soybean meal or corn fermented protein
An experiment was conducted to test the hypothesis that the optimum Trp:Lys ratio in diets for growing pigs is greater if corn fermented protein (CFP) rather than soybean meal (SBM) is used as the protein source in the diets. Two basal diets based on corn and SBM or corn and CFP were formulated. Both diets contained 0.90% SID Lys and both diets had a standardized ileal digestible (SID) Trp:Lys ratio of 10% (i.e., 60% of the requirement). All other indispensable amino acids were included at or above the requirement in both basal diets. Eight additional diets were formulated by adding crystalline L-Trp to both basal diets to generate diets with 14, 17, 20, or 24% SID Trp:Lys ratio for each protein source. Therefore, there were five SID Trp:Lys ratios for each protein source. A total of 320 growing pigs with an initial body weight (BW) of 25.53 ± 2.85 kg were randomly allotted to one of the 10 dietary treatments and fed experimental diets for 28 d. On day 1 and 28, a blood sample, which was analyzed for blood urea nitrogen (BUN), was collected from the jugular vein of one barrow in each pen. Data were analyzed by linear and quadratic contrasts in SAS (Inst. Inc. Cary, NC, USA). The optimal SID Trp:Lys ratio was estimated using linear broken-line and quadratic broken-line regressions for average daily gain (ADG) and BUN, using the NLIN procedure in SAS. A Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to determine if the requirement estimates for CFP or SBM were different. Results indicated that pigs fed the corn-SBM diets had greater (P &lt; 0.05) final BW, ADG, average daily feed intake, gain to feed ratio, and daily Trp intake than pigs fed corn-CFP diets (Table 1). On d 28, BUN decreased (linear and quadratic, P &lt; 0.05) as the SID Trp:Lys ratio increased regardless of protein source. For pigs fed the SBM diets, combined broken-line quadratic analyses estimated the optimum SID Trp:Lys requirement as 18.95 and 15.54% for ADG and BUN, respectively, but for pigs fed the CFP-based diets, the optimum SID Trp:Lys requirement were 20.51 and 15.65% for ADG and BUN, respectively. The average SID Trp:Lys ratio for the two measurements was 18.08 and 17.24% for CFP and SBM, respectively. These values were not different (Table 2), and under the conditions of this experiment, the requirement for Trp was not different in diets based on CFP compared with diets based on SBM. Therefore, the hypothesis for the experiment was rejected. In conclusion, pigs fed diets based on CFP rather than SBM have reduced growth performance, but the main reason for this does not appear to be a deficiency of Trp.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of animal science
Journal of animal science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
1589
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Animal Science (JAS) is the premier journal for animal science and serves as the leading source of new knowledge and perspective in this area. JAS publishes more than 500 fully reviewed research articles, invited reviews, technical notes, and letters to the editor each year. Articles published in JAS encompass a broad range of research topics in animal production and fundamental aspects of genetics, nutrition, physiology, and preparation and utilization of animal products. Articles typically report research with beef cattle, companion animals, goats, horses, pigs, and sheep; however, studies involving other farm animals, aquatic and wildlife species, and laboratory animal species that address fundamental questions related to livestock and companion animal biology will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信