使用豆粕、菜籽粕和玉米酒糟干粒及其可溶物对群养猪净能量、温室气体排放和氮平衡的影响

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Jimena A Ibagon, Su A Lee, Hans H Stein
{"title":"使用豆粕、菜籽粕和玉米酒糟干粒及其可溶物对群养猪净能量、温室气体排放和氮平衡的影响","authors":"Jimena A Ibagon, Su A Lee, Hans H Stein","doi":"10.1093/jas/skaf102.054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective was to test the null hypothesis that there are no differences in net energy (NE), greenhouse gas emission, and N balance in pigs fed diets containing soybean meal (SBM), canola meal (CM), and corn distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS). Three dies contained corn and one of the three feed ingredients (i.e., SBM, CM, or DDGS). A total of 24 growing pigs (initial weight = 46.84 ± 2.25 kg) were allotted to 6 chambers with 4 pigs per chamber. The 6 chambers were then allotted to the three diets using a repeated 3 Í 3 Latin square design with 3 periods. Pigs had free access to water and feed. Feces and urine samples were quantitatively collected during the collection period, and O2 consumption, CO2 and CH4 productions, and urine N excretion were measured during collection and fasting periods. Using Proc MIXED of SAS, the statistical model included diet as fixed variable and square, chamber, and period as random variables. Pairwise comparisons were used to separate the means. Results indicated that the apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of dry matter and gross energy were greater (P < 0.05) in SBM diet compared with CM and DDGS diets (Table 1). Concentrations of NE were not different between DDGS and SBM diets, but were greater (P < 0.05) compared with the CM diet. Daily O2 consumption per kg gain was greater (P < 0.05) and CO2 production per kg gain tended to be greater (P < 0.10) in pigs fed the CM diet compared with pigs fed the SBM or DDGS diets. However, production of CH4 did not differ among the three diets. Intake of N and total N excretion were not different among pigs fed the three diets, but the ATTD of N and absorbed N were greater (P < 0.05) and retained N (g/d) tended to be greater (P < 0.10) for pigs fed the SBM diet compared with the CM or DDGS diets. Retention of N (% of intake) did not differ among the three diets. Retention of N (% of absorbed) was not different between SBM and CM diets or between CM and DDGS diets, but was less (P < 0.05) in the SBM diet than in the DDGS diet. In conclusion, use of SBM or DDGS increased NE in corn-based diets compared with CM fed to group-housed pigs. Per kg gain, pigs produced less greenhouse gas when fed SBM or DDGS diets than when fed the CM diet. Pigs fed the diet containing SBM had greater absorbed and retained N (g/d) compared with those fed diets containing CM or DDGS.","PeriodicalId":14895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of animal science","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"220 Effects of using soybean meal, canola meal, and corn distillers dried grains with solubles on net energy, greenhouse gas emission, and nitrogen balance in group-housed pigs\",\"authors\":\"Jimena A Ibagon, Su A Lee, Hans H Stein\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jas/skaf102.054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective was to test the null hypothesis that there are no differences in net energy (NE), greenhouse gas emission, and N balance in pigs fed diets containing soybean meal (SBM), canola meal (CM), and corn distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS). Three dies contained corn and one of the three feed ingredients (i.e., SBM, CM, or DDGS). A total of 24 growing pigs (initial weight = 46.84 ± 2.25 kg) were allotted to 6 chambers with 4 pigs per chamber. The 6 chambers were then allotted to the three diets using a repeated 3 Í 3 Latin square design with 3 periods. Pigs had free access to water and feed. Feces and urine samples were quantitatively collected during the collection period, and O2 consumption, CO2 and CH4 productions, and urine N excretion were measured during collection and fasting periods. Using Proc MIXED of SAS, the statistical model included diet as fixed variable and square, chamber, and period as random variables. Pairwise comparisons were used to separate the means. Results indicated that the apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of dry matter and gross energy were greater (P < 0.05) in SBM diet compared with CM and DDGS diets (Table 1). Concentrations of NE were not different between DDGS and SBM diets, but were greater (P < 0.05) compared with the CM diet. Daily O2 consumption per kg gain was greater (P < 0.05) and CO2 production per kg gain tended to be greater (P < 0.10) in pigs fed the CM diet compared with pigs fed the SBM or DDGS diets. However, production of CH4 did not differ among the three diets. Intake of N and total N excretion were not different among pigs fed the three diets, but the ATTD of N and absorbed N were greater (P < 0.05) and retained N (g/d) tended to be greater (P < 0.10) for pigs fed the SBM diet compared with the CM or DDGS diets. Retention of N (% of intake) did not differ among the three diets. Retention of N (% of absorbed) was not different between SBM and CM diets or between CM and DDGS diets, but was less (P < 0.05) in the SBM diet than in the DDGS diet. In conclusion, use of SBM or DDGS increased NE in corn-based diets compared with CM fed to group-housed pigs. Per kg gain, pigs produced less greenhouse gas when fed SBM or DDGS diets than when fed the CM diet. Pigs fed the diet containing SBM had greater absorbed and retained N (g/d) compared with those fed diets containing CM or DDGS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of animal science\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of animal science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf102.054\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of animal science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf102.054","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本试验旨在验证饲粮中添加豆粕(SBM)、菜籽粕(CM)和玉米酒糟干粒及其可溶物(DDGS)对猪的净能(NE)、温室气体排放和氮平衡没有影响的零假设。三个模具含有玉米和三种饲料成分中的一种(即SBM, CM或DDGS)。试验选用24头初始体重为46.84±2.25 kg的生长猪,分配到6个试验仓,每个试验仓4头猪。然后使用重复的3 Í拉丁方形设计将6个房间分配给三种饮食。猪可以自由获取水和饲料。在收集期间定量收集粪便和尿液样本,并在收集和禁食期间测量氧气消耗、CO2和CH4产生以及尿氮排泄。采用SAS的Proc mix统计模型,以日粮为固定变量,方、室和周期为随机变量。两两比较用于分离平均值。结果表明,干物质和总能的表观全消化道消化率(ATTD)较大(P <;0.05),与普通饲料和DDGS饲料相比(表1)。DDGS和SBM日粮中NE的浓度没有差异,但更高(P <;0.05)。每公斤增重日耗氧量较大(P <;0.05),每公斤增重CO2产量有增大趋势(P <;与SBM或DDGS饲粮相比,CM饲粮的肥力提高了0.10)。然而,3种饲粮的CH4产量没有差异。3种饲粮对氮的采食量和总氮排泄量无显著影响,但氮的ATTD和吸收氮的ATTD较大(P <;0.05),保留N (g/d)有较大的趋势(P <;与CM或DDGS日粮相比,SBM日粮猪的代谢率为0.10)。三种饮食中氮的保留率没有差异。豆粕和豆粕日粮、豆粕和DDGS日粮的N保留率(吸收率)无显著差异,但较低(P <;0.05),比DDGS组高。综上所述,与群养猪饲料相比,在玉米基础饲粮中添加SBM或DDGS可提高NE。每公斤增重,饲粮中添加SBM或DDGS的猪比添加CM的猪产生更少的温室气体。饲粮中添加SBM的猪吸收和保留氮(g/d)高于添加CM或DDGS的猪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
220 Effects of using soybean meal, canola meal, and corn distillers dried grains with solubles on net energy, greenhouse gas emission, and nitrogen balance in group-housed pigs
The objective was to test the null hypothesis that there are no differences in net energy (NE), greenhouse gas emission, and N balance in pigs fed diets containing soybean meal (SBM), canola meal (CM), and corn distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS). Three dies contained corn and one of the three feed ingredients (i.e., SBM, CM, or DDGS). A total of 24 growing pigs (initial weight = 46.84 ± 2.25 kg) were allotted to 6 chambers with 4 pigs per chamber. The 6 chambers were then allotted to the three diets using a repeated 3 Í 3 Latin square design with 3 periods. Pigs had free access to water and feed. Feces and urine samples were quantitatively collected during the collection period, and O2 consumption, CO2 and CH4 productions, and urine N excretion were measured during collection and fasting periods. Using Proc MIXED of SAS, the statistical model included diet as fixed variable and square, chamber, and period as random variables. Pairwise comparisons were used to separate the means. Results indicated that the apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of dry matter and gross energy were greater (P &lt; 0.05) in SBM diet compared with CM and DDGS diets (Table 1). Concentrations of NE were not different between DDGS and SBM diets, but were greater (P &lt; 0.05) compared with the CM diet. Daily O2 consumption per kg gain was greater (P &lt; 0.05) and CO2 production per kg gain tended to be greater (P &lt; 0.10) in pigs fed the CM diet compared with pigs fed the SBM or DDGS diets. However, production of CH4 did not differ among the three diets. Intake of N and total N excretion were not different among pigs fed the three diets, but the ATTD of N and absorbed N were greater (P &lt; 0.05) and retained N (g/d) tended to be greater (P &lt; 0.10) for pigs fed the SBM diet compared with the CM or DDGS diets. Retention of N (% of intake) did not differ among the three diets. Retention of N (% of absorbed) was not different between SBM and CM diets or between CM and DDGS diets, but was less (P &lt; 0.05) in the SBM diet than in the DDGS diet. In conclusion, use of SBM or DDGS increased NE in corn-based diets compared with CM fed to group-housed pigs. Per kg gain, pigs produced less greenhouse gas when fed SBM or DDGS diets than when fed the CM diet. Pigs fed the diet containing SBM had greater absorbed and retained N (g/d) compared with those fed diets containing CM or DDGS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of animal science
Journal of animal science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
1589
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Animal Science (JAS) is the premier journal for animal science and serves as the leading source of new knowledge and perspective in this area. JAS publishes more than 500 fully reviewed research articles, invited reviews, technical notes, and letters to the editor each year. Articles published in JAS encompass a broad range of research topics in animal production and fundamental aspects of genetics, nutrition, physiology, and preparation and utilization of animal products. Articles typically report research with beef cattle, companion animals, goats, horses, pigs, and sheep; however, studies involving other farm animals, aquatic and wildlife species, and laboratory animal species that address fundamental questions related to livestock and companion animal biology will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信