表面硬度对人类跳频偏好及足、踝神经肌肉功能的影响。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Jonathon V Birch,Luke A Kelly,Dominic J Farris
{"title":"表面硬度对人类跳频偏好及足、踝神经肌肉功能的影响。","authors":"Jonathon V Birch,Luke A Kelly,Dominic J Farris","doi":"10.1111/sms.70067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Typically, humans tune their lower limb mechanics to preserve center of mass motion when hopping or running on surfaces with different stiffnesses. However, much of our understanding of this interaction is based on frequency-constrained hopping and not preferred behavior, which may also be influenced by the stiffness of the surface underfoot. Therefore, we tested if preferred hopping frequency was different from a previously assumed value of 2.2 Hz and if preference was affected by a less-stiff surface. To help explain any observed trends, we quantified foot and ankle mechanics and muscle activations for frequencies ±20% of preferred. We used custom-built platforms to provide both an elastic and locked (inelastic) surface and asked participants to hop bilaterally in place on each. We measured multi-segment foot and ankle kinematics and ground reaction forces, alongside electromyography (EMG) of flexor digitorum brevis, abductor hallucis, soleus, and tibialis anterior. There was no significant difference between mean preferred hopping frequency and 2.2 Hz, for either surface. There was also no difference in mechanics between preferred frequency and 2.2 Hz conditions. However, there were effects of surface, frequency, and surface-by-frequency interactions on foot and ankle kinematics, kinetics, and EMG. Frequency preference appears to be partially driven by an effort to maximize energy stored and returned in the surface while trading off the costs of active muscular work and the cost associated with producing force. Frequency affects hopping mechanics differently on stiff vs. elastic surfaces.","PeriodicalId":21466,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports","volume":"18 1","pages":"e70067"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of Surface Stiffness on Human Hopping Frequency Preference and the Underlying Neuromuscular Function of the Foot and Ankle.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathon V Birch,Luke A Kelly,Dominic J Farris\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/sms.70067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Typically, humans tune their lower limb mechanics to preserve center of mass motion when hopping or running on surfaces with different stiffnesses. However, much of our understanding of this interaction is based on frequency-constrained hopping and not preferred behavior, which may also be influenced by the stiffness of the surface underfoot. Therefore, we tested if preferred hopping frequency was different from a previously assumed value of 2.2 Hz and if preference was affected by a less-stiff surface. To help explain any observed trends, we quantified foot and ankle mechanics and muscle activations for frequencies ±20% of preferred. We used custom-built platforms to provide both an elastic and locked (inelastic) surface and asked participants to hop bilaterally in place on each. We measured multi-segment foot and ankle kinematics and ground reaction forces, alongside electromyography (EMG) of flexor digitorum brevis, abductor hallucis, soleus, and tibialis anterior. There was no significant difference between mean preferred hopping frequency and 2.2 Hz, for either surface. There was also no difference in mechanics between preferred frequency and 2.2 Hz conditions. However, there were effects of surface, frequency, and surface-by-frequency interactions on foot and ankle kinematics, kinetics, and EMG. Frequency preference appears to be partially driven by an effort to maximize energy stored and returned in the surface while trading off the costs of active muscular work and the cost associated with producing force. Frequency affects hopping mechanics differently on stiff vs. elastic surfaces.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"e70067\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.70067\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.70067","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通常,当人类在不同硬度的表面上跳跃或奔跑时,他们会调整下肢的力学来保持质心运动。然而,我们对这种相互作用的大部分理解是基于频率约束的跳频而不是首选行为,这也可能受到脚下表面刚度的影响。因此,我们测试了偏好跳频是否与先前假设的2.2 Hz值不同,以及偏好是否受到较低硬度表面的影响。为了帮助解释任何观察到的趋势,我们量化了脚部和踝关节力学和肌肉激活频率±20%的优选。我们使用定制的平台来提供弹性和锁定(非弹性)表面,并要求参与者在每个平台上双向跳跃。我们测量了多节段足部和踝关节的运动学和地面反作用力,以及指短屈肌、幻觉外展肌、比目鱼肌和胫骨前肌的肌电图(EMG)。两种表面的平均偏好跳频与2.2 Hz之间无显著差异。在偏好频率和2.2 Hz条件下,力学上也没有区别。然而,表面、频率和表面与频率的相互作用对足部和踝关节的运动学、动力学和肌电图有影响。频率偏好似乎在一定程度上是由一种努力驱动的,即最大限度地储存和返回表面的能量,同时权衡活跃肌肉工作的成本和产生力量的成本。在刚性和弹性表面上,频率对跳跃力学的影响不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effects of Surface Stiffness on Human Hopping Frequency Preference and the Underlying Neuromuscular Function of the Foot and Ankle.
Typically, humans tune their lower limb mechanics to preserve center of mass motion when hopping or running on surfaces with different stiffnesses. However, much of our understanding of this interaction is based on frequency-constrained hopping and not preferred behavior, which may also be influenced by the stiffness of the surface underfoot. Therefore, we tested if preferred hopping frequency was different from a previously assumed value of 2.2 Hz and if preference was affected by a less-stiff surface. To help explain any observed trends, we quantified foot and ankle mechanics and muscle activations for frequencies ±20% of preferred. We used custom-built platforms to provide both an elastic and locked (inelastic) surface and asked participants to hop bilaterally in place on each. We measured multi-segment foot and ankle kinematics and ground reaction forces, alongside electromyography (EMG) of flexor digitorum brevis, abductor hallucis, soleus, and tibialis anterior. There was no significant difference between mean preferred hopping frequency and 2.2 Hz, for either surface. There was also no difference in mechanics between preferred frequency and 2.2 Hz conditions. However, there were effects of surface, frequency, and surface-by-frequency interactions on foot and ankle kinematics, kinetics, and EMG. Frequency preference appears to be partially driven by an effort to maximize energy stored and returned in the surface while trading off the costs of active muscular work and the cost associated with producing force. Frequency affects hopping mechanics differently on stiff vs. elastic surfaces.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.90%
发文量
162
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports is a multidisciplinary journal published 12 times per year under the auspices of the Scandinavian Foundation of Medicine and Science in Sports. It aims to publish high quality and impactful articles in the fields of orthopaedics, rehabilitation and sports medicine, exercise physiology and biochemistry, biomechanics and motor control, health and disease relating to sport, exercise and physical activity, as well as on the social and behavioural aspects of sport and exercise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信