Taiseer A Sulaiman, Tariq A Alsahafi, Aous A Abdulmajeed, Mostafa Sulaiman, Abdulhaq A Suliman
{"title":"金刚石旋转仪器切割氧化锆和二硅酸锂修复体的效率。","authors":"Taiseer A Sulaiman, Tariq A Alsahafi, Aous A Abdulmajeed, Mostafa Sulaiman, Abdulhaq A Suliman","doi":"10.11607/ijp.9341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the impact of diamond rotary instrument grit size and rotational speed on cutting efficiency through lithium disilicate and zirconia ceramic materials.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A rectangular-shaped specimen of 12.5 × 14.5 mm and 2 mm thickness of forty lithium disilicate (IPS Emax; Ivoclar) and forty 4 mol% yttria zirconia (Katana STML; Noritake) was milled and sintered according to the manufacturer's instructions. Two diamond rotary instruments (X-tra coarse, 230 µm grit size, and fine, 46 µm grit size; Komet USA) were used to cut into the ceramic materials at 200 000 and 50 000 revolutions per minute (RPM) under a continuous water cooling rate of 50 mL/min (n = 10/grit/speed). Handpiece movement was controlled, torque was maintained at 3.4 Ncm, and pressure was maintained at 2 N using a load sensor. The efficiency of each rotary instrument was calculated. Scanning electron microscope images were made of each rotary instrument to visualize wear and deterioration. Data were analyzed statistically (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ceramic material cutting efficiency differed amongst diamond rotary instruments (P<.001). A coarse diamond rotary instrument at 200 000 RPM cut both ceramics efficiently (P <.001)for zirconia and lithium disilicate specimens; cutting efficiency was .064 and .107 mm/sec, respectively. Only coarse diamond rotary instruments can cut 10 mm in 10 minutes. High speed led to more efficient cutting regardless of ceramic material or rotary instrument grit (P<.001). Scanning electron images show higher wear and degradation in both grit diamond rotary instruments at 200,000 RPM than at 50,000 RPM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Coarse-grit diamond rotary instruments cut zirconia and lithium disilicate ceramics more efficiently than fine-grit ones. High-speed 200 000 RPM cuts ceramics more efficiently than 50 000 RPM at a lower speed.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency of Diamond Rotary Instruments in Cutting Through Zirconia and Lithium Disilicate Restorations.\",\"authors\":\"Taiseer A Sulaiman, Tariq A Alsahafi, Aous A Abdulmajeed, Mostafa Sulaiman, Abdulhaq A Suliman\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/ijp.9341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the impact of diamond rotary instrument grit size and rotational speed on cutting efficiency through lithium disilicate and zirconia ceramic materials.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A rectangular-shaped specimen of 12.5 × 14.5 mm and 2 mm thickness of forty lithium disilicate (IPS Emax; Ivoclar) and forty 4 mol% yttria zirconia (Katana STML; Noritake) was milled and sintered according to the manufacturer's instructions. Two diamond rotary instruments (X-tra coarse, 230 µm grit size, and fine, 46 µm grit size; Komet USA) were used to cut into the ceramic materials at 200 000 and 50 000 revolutions per minute (RPM) under a continuous water cooling rate of 50 mL/min (n = 10/grit/speed). Handpiece movement was controlled, torque was maintained at 3.4 Ncm, and pressure was maintained at 2 N using a load sensor. The efficiency of each rotary instrument was calculated. Scanning electron microscope images were made of each rotary instrument to visualize wear and deterioration. Data were analyzed statistically (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ceramic material cutting efficiency differed amongst diamond rotary instruments (P<.001). A coarse diamond rotary instrument at 200 000 RPM cut both ceramics efficiently (P <.001)for zirconia and lithium disilicate specimens; cutting efficiency was .064 and .107 mm/sec, respectively. Only coarse diamond rotary instruments can cut 10 mm in 10 minutes. High speed led to more efficient cutting regardless of ceramic material or rotary instrument grit (P<.001). Scanning electron images show higher wear and degradation in both grit diamond rotary instruments at 200,000 RPM than at 50,000 RPM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Coarse-grit diamond rotary instruments cut zirconia and lithium disilicate ceramics more efficiently than fine-grit ones. High-speed 200 000 RPM cuts ceramics more efficiently than 50 000 RPM at a lower speed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"1-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9341\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficiency of Diamond Rotary Instruments in Cutting Through Zirconia and Lithium Disilicate Restorations.
Purpose: To investigate the impact of diamond rotary instrument grit size and rotational speed on cutting efficiency through lithium disilicate and zirconia ceramic materials.
Material and methods: A rectangular-shaped specimen of 12.5 × 14.5 mm and 2 mm thickness of forty lithium disilicate (IPS Emax; Ivoclar) and forty 4 mol% yttria zirconia (Katana STML; Noritake) was milled and sintered according to the manufacturer's instructions. Two diamond rotary instruments (X-tra coarse, 230 µm grit size, and fine, 46 µm grit size; Komet USA) were used to cut into the ceramic materials at 200 000 and 50 000 revolutions per minute (RPM) under a continuous water cooling rate of 50 mL/min (n = 10/grit/speed). Handpiece movement was controlled, torque was maintained at 3.4 Ncm, and pressure was maintained at 2 N using a load sensor. The efficiency of each rotary instrument was calculated. Scanning electron microscope images were made of each rotary instrument to visualize wear and deterioration. Data were analyzed statistically (α = 0.05).
Results: Ceramic material cutting efficiency differed amongst diamond rotary instruments (P<.001). A coarse diamond rotary instrument at 200 000 RPM cut both ceramics efficiently (P <.001)for zirconia and lithium disilicate specimens; cutting efficiency was .064 and .107 mm/sec, respectively. Only coarse diamond rotary instruments can cut 10 mm in 10 minutes. High speed led to more efficient cutting regardless of ceramic material or rotary instrument grit (P<.001). Scanning electron images show higher wear and degradation in both grit diamond rotary instruments at 200,000 RPM than at 50,000 RPM.
Conclusions: Coarse-grit diamond rotary instruments cut zirconia and lithium disilicate ceramics more efficiently than fine-grit ones. High-speed 200 000 RPM cuts ceramics more efficiently than 50 000 RPM at a lower speed.