腭顶深度对部分齿状弓数字化精度影响的三维分析。

Enas Elhamy Negm, Mangala Patel, Paul Ryan
{"title":"腭顶深度对部分齿状弓数字化精度影响的三维分析。","authors":"Enas Elhamy Negm, Mangala Patel, Paul Ryan","doi":"10.11607/ijp.9353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the impact of palatal vault depth on the accuracy of scans obtained using three digitization techniques for partially dentate arches through three-dimensional (3D) analysis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Four maxillary Kennedy class II resin casts with varying palatal vault depths (flat: 20.4°, shallow: 26.1°, medium: 40.7°, deep: 58.8°) were digitized using three techniques: direct (intraoral scanner), indirect impression digitization, and indirect cast digitization. Each cast was scanned five times per technique, producing 60 scans. The scanned files were analyzed for trueness and precision using a digital metrology program, with root mean square (RMS) deviations assessed via color maps. Data were analyzed using two way ANOVA and Tukey HSD test (α = .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Direct digitization showed larger palatal deviations compared to indirect methods. The deep vault exhibited the lowest trueness (53.3 ± 7.4 µm) and precision (50.7 ± 6.6 µm) when digitized directly (P < .001). Indirect impression digitization produced the lowest trueness (35.8 ± 7.2 µm) and precision (31.5 ± 3.1 µm) for the medium vault. Indirect cast digitization had the lowest trueness (23.1 ± 3.4 µm) for the medium vault and the lowest precision (31.3 ± 3.2 µm) for the deep vault (P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Digitization accuracy (trueness and precision) was significantly influenced by vault depth and the interaction between digitization technique and depth (P < .001). Direct digitization had the highest accuracy for the medium vault, whereas indirect techniques provided superior accuracy for other vault depths. The deep vault showed reduced accuracy with both direct and indirect digitization methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Influence of Palatal Vault Depth on Digitization Accuracy of Partially Dentate Arches.\",\"authors\":\"Enas Elhamy Negm, Mangala Patel, Paul Ryan\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/ijp.9353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the impact of palatal vault depth on the accuracy of scans obtained using three digitization techniques for partially dentate arches through three-dimensional (3D) analysis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Four maxillary Kennedy class II resin casts with varying palatal vault depths (flat: 20.4°, shallow: 26.1°, medium: 40.7°, deep: 58.8°) were digitized using three techniques: direct (intraoral scanner), indirect impression digitization, and indirect cast digitization. Each cast was scanned five times per technique, producing 60 scans. The scanned files were analyzed for trueness and precision using a digital metrology program, with root mean square (RMS) deviations assessed via color maps. Data were analyzed using two way ANOVA and Tukey HSD test (α = .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Direct digitization showed larger palatal deviations compared to indirect methods. The deep vault exhibited the lowest trueness (53.3 ± 7.4 µm) and precision (50.7 ± 6.6 µm) when digitized directly (P < .001). Indirect impression digitization produced the lowest trueness (35.8 ± 7.2 µm) and precision (31.5 ± 3.1 µm) for the medium vault. Indirect cast digitization had the lowest trueness (23.1 ± 3.4 µm) for the medium vault and the lowest precision (31.3 ± 3.2 µm) for the deep vault (P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Digitization accuracy (trueness and precision) was significantly influenced by vault depth and the interaction between digitization technique and depth (P < .001). Direct digitization had the highest accuracy for the medium vault, whereas indirect techniques provided superior accuracy for other vault depths. The deep vault showed reduced accuracy with both direct and indirect digitization methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"1-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9353\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过三维(3D)分析,评估腭弓深度对三种数字化技术对部分齿状弓扫描精度的影响。材料和方法:采用直接(口内扫描)、间接印模数字化和间接铸型数字化三种技术,对4个上颌Kennedy II类树脂铸型进行了不同腭弓深度(平:20.4°、浅:26.1°、中:40.7°、深:58.8°)的数字化。每种技术对每个铸型进行5次扫描,产生60次扫描。使用数字计量程序分析扫描文件的真实性和精度,并通过彩色地图评估均方根(RMS)偏差。数据分析采用双因素方差分析和Tukey HSD检验(α = 0.05)。结果:直接数字化比间接数字化显示出更大的腭偏差。直接数字化时,深拱顶的真实度(53.3±7.4µm)和精度(50.7±6.6µm)最低(P < 0.001)。间接印模数字化对中等拱顶的真度(35.8±7.2µm)和精度(31.5±3.1µm)最低。间接铸造数字化对中拱的准确率最低(23.1±3.4µm),对深拱的准确率最低(31.3±3.2µm) (P < 0.001)。结论:数字化精度(正确率和精密度)受拱顶深度及数字化技术与深度的交互作用影响显著(P < 0.001)。直接数字化对中等深度的拱顶精度最高,而间接数字化技术对其他深度的拱顶精度更高。无论是直接数字化还是间接数字化,深拱顶的准确性都有所降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Three-Dimensional Analysis of the Influence of Palatal Vault Depth on Digitization Accuracy of Partially Dentate Arches.

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of palatal vault depth on the accuracy of scans obtained using three digitization techniques for partially dentate arches through three-dimensional (3D) analysis.

Materials and methods: Four maxillary Kennedy class II resin casts with varying palatal vault depths (flat: 20.4°, shallow: 26.1°, medium: 40.7°, deep: 58.8°) were digitized using three techniques: direct (intraoral scanner), indirect impression digitization, and indirect cast digitization. Each cast was scanned five times per technique, producing 60 scans. The scanned files were analyzed for trueness and precision using a digital metrology program, with root mean square (RMS) deviations assessed via color maps. Data were analyzed using two way ANOVA and Tukey HSD test (α = .05).

Results: Direct digitization showed larger palatal deviations compared to indirect methods. The deep vault exhibited the lowest trueness (53.3 ± 7.4 µm) and precision (50.7 ± 6.6 µm) when digitized directly (P < .001). Indirect impression digitization produced the lowest trueness (35.8 ± 7.2 µm) and precision (31.5 ± 3.1 µm) for the medium vault. Indirect cast digitization had the lowest trueness (23.1 ± 3.4 µm) for the medium vault and the lowest precision (31.3 ± 3.2 µm) for the deep vault (P < .001).

Conclusion: Digitization accuracy (trueness and precision) was significantly influenced by vault depth and the interaction between digitization technique and depth (P < .001). Direct digitization had the highest accuracy for the medium vault, whereas indirect techniques provided superior accuracy for other vault depths. The deep vault showed reduced accuracy with both direct and indirect digitization methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信