国际医学组织、世界卫生组织和经济合作与发展组织在牙发育不全患者种植体治疗的一年前瞻性质量登记研究中的健康质量领域。

IF 1.8
Vlad Andrei Florescu, Christian Lerche, Michael Boelstoft Holte, Else Marie Pinholt
{"title":"国际医学组织、世界卫生组织和经济合作与发展组织在牙发育不全患者种植体治疗的一年前瞻性质量登记研究中的健康质量领域。","authors":"Vlad Andrei Florescu, Christian Lerche, Michael Boelstoft Holte, Else Marie Pinholt","doi":"10.11607/ijp.9261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This 1-year prospective study evaluates the implementation of the AMETO register in the region of Southern Denmark and how data application relates to the following Institute of Medicine, World Health Organization, and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development health domains: Efficiency, Effectiveness, Patient Centered Care- , Timeliness, Safety, and Equitability.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Implementation of the register was measured using patients registered by the age of 18 years. Inclusion criteria were access to the following data: type of treatment, one- or two-stage procedures, bone augmentation, implant characteristics, and suprastructure retention methods as optional measures of Efficiency; treatment outcome measures, implant survival, peri-implant bone level and health, suprastructure conditions, and cosmetic results as optional measures of Effectiveness; anamnestic information and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)-5 questionnaires as optional measures of Patient Reported Outcome Measures Patient Centered Care; patient readiness for implant insertion by performed orthodontic pre-implant treatment as a measure of Timeliness; avoiding adverse effects of medication, allergic reactions, and tissue damage as optional measures of Safety; age, gender, ethnicity, geographic location, and socioeconomic data as optional measures of Equitability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 227 registered patients. Twenty-six patients (25 with dental agenesis and one with trauma) were included, fulfilling the study's power estimate that was calculated using peri-implant bone level at 1-year follow- up. Patients lacking OHIP questionnaires, implant information, or intraoral radiographs were excluded.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing the AMETO register was challenging. The clinical data in the AMETO register correlate well with the domains used by the IoM, WHO, and OECD.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health Quality Domains of IoM, WHO and OECD in a One Year Prospective Quality Register Study on Implant Treatment in Patients with Dental Agenesis.\",\"authors\":\"Vlad Andrei Florescu, Christian Lerche, Michael Boelstoft Holte, Else Marie Pinholt\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/ijp.9261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This 1-year prospective study evaluates the implementation of the AMETO register in the region of Southern Denmark and how data application relates to the following Institute of Medicine, World Health Organization, and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development health domains: Efficiency, Effectiveness, Patient Centered Care- , Timeliness, Safety, and Equitability.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Implementation of the register was measured using patients registered by the age of 18 years. Inclusion criteria were access to the following data: type of treatment, one- or two-stage procedures, bone augmentation, implant characteristics, and suprastructure retention methods as optional measures of Efficiency; treatment outcome measures, implant survival, peri-implant bone level and health, suprastructure conditions, and cosmetic results as optional measures of Effectiveness; anamnestic information and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)-5 questionnaires as optional measures of Patient Reported Outcome Measures Patient Centered Care; patient readiness for implant insertion by performed orthodontic pre-implant treatment as a measure of Timeliness; avoiding adverse effects of medication, allergic reactions, and tissue damage as optional measures of Safety; age, gender, ethnicity, geographic location, and socioeconomic data as optional measures of Equitability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 227 registered patients. Twenty-six patients (25 with dental agenesis and one with trauma) were included, fulfilling the study's power estimate that was calculated using peri-implant bone level at 1-year follow- up. Patients lacking OHIP questionnaires, implant information, or intraoral radiographs were excluded.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing the AMETO register was challenging. The clinical data in the AMETO register correlate well with the domains used by the IoM, WHO, and OECD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"1-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9261\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:这项为期一年的前瞻性研究评估了AMETO登记在丹麦南部地区的实施情况,以及数据应用与以下医学研究所、世界卫生组织和经济合作与发展组织卫生领域的关系:效率、有效性、以患者为中心的护理、及时性、安全性和公平性。材料和方法:采用年龄为18岁的登记患者来衡量登记的实施情况。纳入标准是获得以下数据:治疗类型,一期或两期手术,骨增强,种植体特征,以及作为效率可选措施的上层结构保留方法;治疗结果测量、种植体存活、种植体周围骨水平和健康、上结构状况和美容结果作为有效性的可选测量;健忘信息和口腔健康影响概况(OHIP)-5问卷作为患者报告结果测量患者中心护理的可选措施;通过进行正畸种植前治疗来衡量患者对种植体插入的准备程度;作为可选的安全措施,避免药物不良反应、过敏反应和组织损伤;年龄、性别、种族、地理位置和社会经济数据作为公平性的可选措施。结果:登记患者227例。纳入26例患者(25例牙发育不全,1例外伤),符合研究的功率估计,该估计是在1年随访时使用种植体周围骨水平计算的。排除了缺乏OHIP问卷、种植体信息或口内x线片的患者。结论:实施AMETO登记具有挑战性。AMETO登记的临床数据与国际医学组织、世界卫生组织和经合组织使用的领域有很好的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health Quality Domains of IoM, WHO and OECD in a One Year Prospective Quality Register Study on Implant Treatment in Patients with Dental Agenesis.

Purpose: This 1-year prospective study evaluates the implementation of the AMETO register in the region of Southern Denmark and how data application relates to the following Institute of Medicine, World Health Organization, and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development health domains: Efficiency, Effectiveness, Patient Centered Care- , Timeliness, Safety, and Equitability.

Materials and methods: Implementation of the register was measured using patients registered by the age of 18 years. Inclusion criteria were access to the following data: type of treatment, one- or two-stage procedures, bone augmentation, implant characteristics, and suprastructure retention methods as optional measures of Efficiency; treatment outcome measures, implant survival, peri-implant bone level and health, suprastructure conditions, and cosmetic results as optional measures of Effectiveness; anamnestic information and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)-5 questionnaires as optional measures of Patient Reported Outcome Measures Patient Centered Care; patient readiness for implant insertion by performed orthodontic pre-implant treatment as a measure of Timeliness; avoiding adverse effects of medication, allergic reactions, and tissue damage as optional measures of Safety; age, gender, ethnicity, geographic location, and socioeconomic data as optional measures of Equitability.

Results: There were 227 registered patients. Twenty-six patients (25 with dental agenesis and one with trauma) were included, fulfilling the study's power estimate that was calculated using peri-implant bone level at 1-year follow- up. Patients lacking OHIP questionnaires, implant information, or intraoral radiographs were excluded.

Conclusions: Implementing the AMETO register was challenging. The clinical data in the AMETO register correlate well with the domains used by the IoM, WHO, and OECD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信