Vlad Andrei Florescu, Christian Lerche, Michael Boelstoft Holte, Else Marie Pinholt
{"title":"国际医学组织、世界卫生组织和经济合作与发展组织在牙发育不全患者种植体治疗的一年前瞻性质量登记研究中的健康质量领域。","authors":"Vlad Andrei Florescu, Christian Lerche, Michael Boelstoft Holte, Else Marie Pinholt","doi":"10.11607/ijp.9261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This 1-year prospective study evaluates the implementation of the AMETO register in the region of Southern Denmark and how data application relates to the following Institute of Medicine, World Health Organization, and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development health domains: Efficiency, Effectiveness, Patient Centered Care- , Timeliness, Safety, and Equitability.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Implementation of the register was measured using patients registered by the age of 18 years. Inclusion criteria were access to the following data: type of treatment, one- or two-stage procedures, bone augmentation, implant characteristics, and suprastructure retention methods as optional measures of Efficiency; treatment outcome measures, implant survival, peri-implant bone level and health, suprastructure conditions, and cosmetic results as optional measures of Effectiveness; anamnestic information and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)-5 questionnaires as optional measures of Patient Reported Outcome Measures Patient Centered Care; patient readiness for implant insertion by performed orthodontic pre-implant treatment as a measure of Timeliness; avoiding adverse effects of medication, allergic reactions, and tissue damage as optional measures of Safety; age, gender, ethnicity, geographic location, and socioeconomic data as optional measures of Equitability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 227 registered patients. Twenty-six patients (25 with dental agenesis and one with trauma) were included, fulfilling the study's power estimate that was calculated using peri-implant bone level at 1-year follow- up. Patients lacking OHIP questionnaires, implant information, or intraoral radiographs were excluded.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing the AMETO register was challenging. The clinical data in the AMETO register correlate well with the domains used by the IoM, WHO, and OECD.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health Quality Domains of IoM, WHO and OECD in a One Year Prospective Quality Register Study on Implant Treatment in Patients with Dental Agenesis.\",\"authors\":\"Vlad Andrei Florescu, Christian Lerche, Michael Boelstoft Holte, Else Marie Pinholt\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/ijp.9261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This 1-year prospective study evaluates the implementation of the AMETO register in the region of Southern Denmark and how data application relates to the following Institute of Medicine, World Health Organization, and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development health domains: Efficiency, Effectiveness, Patient Centered Care- , Timeliness, Safety, and Equitability.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Implementation of the register was measured using patients registered by the age of 18 years. Inclusion criteria were access to the following data: type of treatment, one- or two-stage procedures, bone augmentation, implant characteristics, and suprastructure retention methods as optional measures of Efficiency; treatment outcome measures, implant survival, peri-implant bone level and health, suprastructure conditions, and cosmetic results as optional measures of Effectiveness; anamnestic information and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)-5 questionnaires as optional measures of Patient Reported Outcome Measures Patient Centered Care; patient readiness for implant insertion by performed orthodontic pre-implant treatment as a measure of Timeliness; avoiding adverse effects of medication, allergic reactions, and tissue damage as optional measures of Safety; age, gender, ethnicity, geographic location, and socioeconomic data as optional measures of Equitability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 227 registered patients. Twenty-six patients (25 with dental agenesis and one with trauma) were included, fulfilling the study's power estimate that was calculated using peri-implant bone level at 1-year follow- up. Patients lacking OHIP questionnaires, implant information, or intraoral radiographs were excluded.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing the AMETO register was challenging. The clinical data in the AMETO register correlate well with the domains used by the IoM, WHO, and OECD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"1-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9261\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Health Quality Domains of IoM, WHO and OECD in a One Year Prospective Quality Register Study on Implant Treatment in Patients with Dental Agenesis.
Purpose: This 1-year prospective study evaluates the implementation of the AMETO register in the region of Southern Denmark and how data application relates to the following Institute of Medicine, World Health Organization, and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development health domains: Efficiency, Effectiveness, Patient Centered Care- , Timeliness, Safety, and Equitability.
Materials and methods: Implementation of the register was measured using patients registered by the age of 18 years. Inclusion criteria were access to the following data: type of treatment, one- or two-stage procedures, bone augmentation, implant characteristics, and suprastructure retention methods as optional measures of Efficiency; treatment outcome measures, implant survival, peri-implant bone level and health, suprastructure conditions, and cosmetic results as optional measures of Effectiveness; anamnestic information and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)-5 questionnaires as optional measures of Patient Reported Outcome Measures Patient Centered Care; patient readiness for implant insertion by performed orthodontic pre-implant treatment as a measure of Timeliness; avoiding adverse effects of medication, allergic reactions, and tissue damage as optional measures of Safety; age, gender, ethnicity, geographic location, and socioeconomic data as optional measures of Equitability.
Results: There were 227 registered patients. Twenty-six patients (25 with dental agenesis and one with trauma) were included, fulfilling the study's power estimate that was calculated using peri-implant bone level at 1-year follow- up. Patients lacking OHIP questionnaires, implant information, or intraoral radiographs were excluded.
Conclusions: Implementing the AMETO register was challenging. The clinical data in the AMETO register correlate well with the domains used by the IoM, WHO, and OECD.