完全性心脏传导阻滞妇女的妊娠结局:来自三级医院的经验。

IF 0.7 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Richa Vatsa, Ranjana Puleria, Vidushi Kulshrestha, Ajisha Aravindan, Soniya Dhiman, K Aparna Sharma, Vatsla Dadhwal
{"title":"完全性心脏传导阻滞妇女的妊娠结局:来自三级医院的经验。","authors":"Richa Vatsa, Ranjana Puleria, Vidushi Kulshrestha, Ajisha Aravindan, Soniya Dhiman, K Aparna Sharma, Vatsla Dadhwal","doi":"10.1007/s13224-024-02092-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pregnancy in women with complete heart block (CHB) poses a substantial challenge. We share our experience of managing pregnancies in patients with CHB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this case series, outcome of 12 pregnancies in 10 women with PPM is studied. The presentation, need for pacemaker, and cardiac intervention were noted in patients with CHB. Mode of delivery, obstetric complications, and neonatal outcomes were compared with 24 low-risk pregnancies. Data analysis was carried out using SPSS software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Syncope was presenting symptoms in seven (70%) women. Three women (30%) presented for first time during pregnancy. Out of 12 pregnancies in 10 women, eight pregnancies in six patients had a permanent pacemaker (PPM) from the start of pregnancy. Among rest four patients without a PPM, two (50%) needed pacing, one needed PPM in the second trimester, and one had a temporary pacemaker implantation (TPI) at the time of delivery. Obstetric complications and period of gestation were similar between cases and controls. The cesarean delivery rate was higher in patients with CHB, but the difference was not significant (75% vs. 37.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.07). None of the patients needed intensive care unit care. Mean birth weight was lower among cases (2443 ± 442 g vs. 3167 ± 434 g), but the incidence of fetal growth restriction was not different between cases and controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pregnancy in patients without PPM can be safely managed without pacing, with good obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Backup for TPI and/or cardiac interventions should be available during labor.</p>","PeriodicalId":51563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India","volume":"75 Suppl 1","pages":"480-486"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12085507/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Complete Heart Block: Experience from a Tertiary Care Hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Richa Vatsa, Ranjana Puleria, Vidushi Kulshrestha, Ajisha Aravindan, Soniya Dhiman, K Aparna Sharma, Vatsla Dadhwal\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13224-024-02092-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pregnancy in women with complete heart block (CHB) poses a substantial challenge. We share our experience of managing pregnancies in patients with CHB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this case series, outcome of 12 pregnancies in 10 women with PPM is studied. The presentation, need for pacemaker, and cardiac intervention were noted in patients with CHB. Mode of delivery, obstetric complications, and neonatal outcomes were compared with 24 low-risk pregnancies. Data analysis was carried out using SPSS software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Syncope was presenting symptoms in seven (70%) women. Three women (30%) presented for first time during pregnancy. Out of 12 pregnancies in 10 women, eight pregnancies in six patients had a permanent pacemaker (PPM) from the start of pregnancy. Among rest four patients without a PPM, two (50%) needed pacing, one needed PPM in the second trimester, and one had a temporary pacemaker implantation (TPI) at the time of delivery. Obstetric complications and period of gestation were similar between cases and controls. The cesarean delivery rate was higher in patients with CHB, but the difference was not significant (75% vs. 37.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.07). None of the patients needed intensive care unit care. Mean birth weight was lower among cases (2443 ± 442 g vs. 3167 ± 434 g), but the incidence of fetal growth restriction was not different between cases and controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pregnancy in patients without PPM can be safely managed without pacing, with good obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Backup for TPI and/or cardiac interventions should be available during labor.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India\",\"volume\":\"75 Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"480-486\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12085507/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-024-02092-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-024-02092-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:完全性心脏传导阻滞(CHB)妇女的妊娠是一个重大挑战。我们分享管理CHB患者妊娠的经验。方法:在这个病例系列中,研究了10例PPM妇女的12例妊娠结局。注意慢性乙型肝炎患者的表现、起搏器的需要和心脏干预。对24例低危妊娠的分娩方式、产科并发症和新生儿结局进行比较。采用SPSS软件进行数据分析。结果:7例(70%)女性出现晕厥症状。3名妇女(30%)在怀孕期间首次出现。在10名女性的12次怀孕中,6名患者中的8名怀孕从怀孕开始就使用了永久性起搏器(PPM)。其余4例患者中,2例(50%)需要起搏,1例在妊娠中期需要起搏,1例在分娩时进行了临时起搏器植入(TPI)。产科并发症和妊娠期在病例和对照组之间相似。CHB患者剖宫产率较高,但差异无统计学意义(75% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.07)。没有一个病人需要重症监护病房的护理。两组平均出生体重较低(2443±442 g vs 3167±434 g),但胎儿生长受限发生率与对照组无差异。结论:无PPM患者的妊娠无需起搏即可安全管理,具有良好的产科和新生儿结局。分娩时应提供TPI和/或心脏干预的备用方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Complete Heart Block: Experience from a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Background: Pregnancy in women with complete heart block (CHB) poses a substantial challenge. We share our experience of managing pregnancies in patients with CHB.

Methods: In this case series, outcome of 12 pregnancies in 10 women with PPM is studied. The presentation, need for pacemaker, and cardiac intervention were noted in patients with CHB. Mode of delivery, obstetric complications, and neonatal outcomes were compared with 24 low-risk pregnancies. Data analysis was carried out using SPSS software.

Results: Syncope was presenting symptoms in seven (70%) women. Three women (30%) presented for first time during pregnancy. Out of 12 pregnancies in 10 women, eight pregnancies in six patients had a permanent pacemaker (PPM) from the start of pregnancy. Among rest four patients without a PPM, two (50%) needed pacing, one needed PPM in the second trimester, and one had a temporary pacemaker implantation (TPI) at the time of delivery. Obstetric complications and period of gestation were similar between cases and controls. The cesarean delivery rate was higher in patients with CHB, but the difference was not significant (75% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.07). None of the patients needed intensive care unit care. Mean birth weight was lower among cases (2443 ± 442 g vs. 3167 ± 434 g), but the incidence of fetal growth restriction was not different between cases and controls.

Conclusion: Pregnancy in patients without PPM can be safely managed without pacing, with good obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Backup for TPI and/or cardiac interventions should be available during labor.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India (JOGI) is the official journal of the Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology Societies of India (FOGSI). This is a peer- reviewed journal and features articles pertaining to the field of obstetrics and gynecology. The Journal is published six times a year on a bimonthly basis. Articles contributed by clinicians involved in patient care and research, and basic science researchers are considered. It publishes clinical and basic research of all aspects of obstetrics and gynecology, community obstetrics and family welfare and subspecialty subjects including gynecological endoscopy, infertility, oncology and ultrasonography, provided they have scientific merit and represent an important advance in knowledge. The journal believes in diversity and welcomes and encourages relevant contributions from world over. The types of articles published are: ·         Original Article·         Case Report ·         Instrumentation and Techniques ·         Short Commentary ·         Correspondence (Letter to the Editor) ·         Pictorial Essay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信