剖宫产术中皮下缝合和金属钉缝合皮肤后患者满意度:一项三级中心的随机研究。

IF 0.7 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Shafaq Bhandari, Manu Goyal, Shashank Shekhar, Pratibha Singh
{"title":"剖宫产术中皮下缝合和金属钉缝合皮肤后患者满意度:一项三级中心的随机研究。","authors":"Shafaq Bhandari, Manu Goyal, Shashank Shekhar, Pratibha Singh","doi":"10.1007/s13224-024-02040-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A variety of materials and techniques are used for skin closure after caesarean section (CS), common ones being sutures and staples. The technique chosen should be simple, quick, painless, and provide good cosmesis with least wound complications, and there is a need to identify which provides the best outcome.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim was to compare metallic surgical staples versus subcuticular sutures for skin closure after caesarean delivery in terms of wound complications, skin closure time, pain score on day 3, and patient satisfaction after 6 weeks.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 300 women undergoing CS with Pfannenstiel incision were randomized into two groups using sealed envelopes. Skin closure was done, and time was noted simultaneously. Wound condition and pain score were assessed on day 3 and 6 weeks post-operatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On day 3 post-operatively, 22% patients in each group had abnormal healing. After 6 weeks, 1.37% patients with sutures and 3.44% patients with staples had abnormal healing (p value 0.39). Total 10 patients (3.33%), 5 in each group, underwent resuturing within 6 weeks post-operatively. Staples reduced skin closure time as compared to sutures (p value <0.001). Mean pain score was comparable between two groups on day 3 post-operatively (p value 0.08) and at 6 weeks (p value 0.45). Patient satisfaction score considering the appearance and comfort of scar was comparable between both groups (p value 0.25).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Staples and subcuticular sutures are equivalent to each other, and the choice of skin closure material is at the discretion of the surgeon.</p>","PeriodicalId":51563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India","volume":"75 Suppl 1","pages":"430-436"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12085501/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Satisfaction After Subcuticular Sutures and Metallic Staples for Skin Closure in Caesarean Section: A Randomized Study at a Tertiary Centre.\",\"authors\":\"Shafaq Bhandari, Manu Goyal, Shashank Shekhar, Pratibha Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13224-024-02040-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A variety of materials and techniques are used for skin closure after caesarean section (CS), common ones being sutures and staples. The technique chosen should be simple, quick, painless, and provide good cosmesis with least wound complications, and there is a need to identify which provides the best outcome.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim was to compare metallic surgical staples versus subcuticular sutures for skin closure after caesarean delivery in terms of wound complications, skin closure time, pain score on day 3, and patient satisfaction after 6 weeks.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 300 women undergoing CS with Pfannenstiel incision were randomized into two groups using sealed envelopes. Skin closure was done, and time was noted simultaneously. Wound condition and pain score were assessed on day 3 and 6 weeks post-operatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On day 3 post-operatively, 22% patients in each group had abnormal healing. After 6 weeks, 1.37% patients with sutures and 3.44% patients with staples had abnormal healing (p value 0.39). Total 10 patients (3.33%), 5 in each group, underwent resuturing within 6 weeks post-operatively. Staples reduced skin closure time as compared to sutures (p value <0.001). Mean pain score was comparable between two groups on day 3 post-operatively (p value 0.08) and at 6 weeks (p value 0.45). Patient satisfaction score considering the appearance and comfort of scar was comparable between both groups (p value 0.25).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Staples and subcuticular sutures are equivalent to each other, and the choice of skin closure material is at the discretion of the surgeon.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India\",\"volume\":\"75 Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"430-436\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12085501/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-024-02040-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-024-02040-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:剖宫产术后皮肤闭合采用多种材料和技术,常见的有缝合线和订书钉。所选择的技术应该是简单、快速、无痛的,并提供良好的美容和最少的伤口并发症,有必要确定哪种技术能提供最好的结果。目的:比较金属手术钉与皮下缝合线在剖宫产术后伤口并发症、皮肤闭合时间、第3天疼痛评分和6周后患者满意度方面的差异。材料与方法:将300例经Pfannenstiel切口行CS的妇女随机分为两组,采用密封膜。完成皮肤闭合,同时记录时间。术后第3、6周分别评估伤口状况和疼痛评分。结果:术后第3天,两组患者愈合异常率均为22%。6周后,缝线组1.37%、钉钉组3.44%出现异常愈合(p值0.39)。术后6周内行缝合10例(3.33%),每组5例。结论:订书钉与皮下缝合线的缝合效果相当,缝合材料的选择由术者自行决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient Satisfaction After Subcuticular Sutures and Metallic Staples for Skin Closure in Caesarean Section: A Randomized Study at a Tertiary Centre.

Background: A variety of materials and techniques are used for skin closure after caesarean section (CS), common ones being sutures and staples. The technique chosen should be simple, quick, painless, and provide good cosmesis with least wound complications, and there is a need to identify which provides the best outcome.

Objectives: The aim was to compare metallic surgical staples versus subcuticular sutures for skin closure after caesarean delivery in terms of wound complications, skin closure time, pain score on day 3, and patient satisfaction after 6 weeks.

Materials and methods: A total of 300 women undergoing CS with Pfannenstiel incision were randomized into two groups using sealed envelopes. Skin closure was done, and time was noted simultaneously. Wound condition and pain score were assessed on day 3 and 6 weeks post-operatively.

Results: On day 3 post-operatively, 22% patients in each group had abnormal healing. After 6 weeks, 1.37% patients with sutures and 3.44% patients with staples had abnormal healing (p value 0.39). Total 10 patients (3.33%), 5 in each group, underwent resuturing within 6 weeks post-operatively. Staples reduced skin closure time as compared to sutures (p value <0.001). Mean pain score was comparable between two groups on day 3 post-operatively (p value 0.08) and at 6 weeks (p value 0.45). Patient satisfaction score considering the appearance and comfort of scar was comparable between both groups (p value 0.25).

Conclusion: Staples and subcuticular sutures are equivalent to each other, and the choice of skin closure material is at the discretion of the surgeon.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India (JOGI) is the official journal of the Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology Societies of India (FOGSI). This is a peer- reviewed journal and features articles pertaining to the field of obstetrics and gynecology. The Journal is published six times a year on a bimonthly basis. Articles contributed by clinicians involved in patient care and research, and basic science researchers are considered. It publishes clinical and basic research of all aspects of obstetrics and gynecology, community obstetrics and family welfare and subspecialty subjects including gynecological endoscopy, infertility, oncology and ultrasonography, provided they have scientific merit and represent an important advance in knowledge. The journal believes in diversity and welcomes and encourages relevant contributions from world over. The types of articles published are: ·         Original Article·         Case Report ·         Instrumentation and Techniques ·         Short Commentary ·         Correspondence (Letter to the Editor) ·         Pictorial Essay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信