Shafaq Bhandari, Manu Goyal, Shashank Shekhar, Pratibha Singh
{"title":"剖宫产术中皮下缝合和金属钉缝合皮肤后患者满意度:一项三级中心的随机研究。","authors":"Shafaq Bhandari, Manu Goyal, Shashank Shekhar, Pratibha Singh","doi":"10.1007/s13224-024-02040-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A variety of materials and techniques are used for skin closure after caesarean section (CS), common ones being sutures and staples. The technique chosen should be simple, quick, painless, and provide good cosmesis with least wound complications, and there is a need to identify which provides the best outcome.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim was to compare metallic surgical staples versus subcuticular sutures for skin closure after caesarean delivery in terms of wound complications, skin closure time, pain score on day 3, and patient satisfaction after 6 weeks.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 300 women undergoing CS with Pfannenstiel incision were randomized into two groups using sealed envelopes. Skin closure was done, and time was noted simultaneously. Wound condition and pain score were assessed on day 3 and 6 weeks post-operatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On day 3 post-operatively, 22% patients in each group had abnormal healing. After 6 weeks, 1.37% patients with sutures and 3.44% patients with staples had abnormal healing (p value 0.39). Total 10 patients (3.33%), 5 in each group, underwent resuturing within 6 weeks post-operatively. Staples reduced skin closure time as compared to sutures (p value <0.001). Mean pain score was comparable between two groups on day 3 post-operatively (p value 0.08) and at 6 weeks (p value 0.45). Patient satisfaction score considering the appearance and comfort of scar was comparable between both groups (p value 0.25).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Staples and subcuticular sutures are equivalent to each other, and the choice of skin closure material is at the discretion of the surgeon.</p>","PeriodicalId":51563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India","volume":"75 Suppl 1","pages":"430-436"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12085501/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Satisfaction After Subcuticular Sutures and Metallic Staples for Skin Closure in Caesarean Section: A Randomized Study at a Tertiary Centre.\",\"authors\":\"Shafaq Bhandari, Manu Goyal, Shashank Shekhar, Pratibha Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13224-024-02040-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A variety of materials and techniques are used for skin closure after caesarean section (CS), common ones being sutures and staples. The technique chosen should be simple, quick, painless, and provide good cosmesis with least wound complications, and there is a need to identify which provides the best outcome.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim was to compare metallic surgical staples versus subcuticular sutures for skin closure after caesarean delivery in terms of wound complications, skin closure time, pain score on day 3, and patient satisfaction after 6 weeks.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 300 women undergoing CS with Pfannenstiel incision were randomized into two groups using sealed envelopes. Skin closure was done, and time was noted simultaneously. Wound condition and pain score were assessed on day 3 and 6 weeks post-operatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On day 3 post-operatively, 22% patients in each group had abnormal healing. After 6 weeks, 1.37% patients with sutures and 3.44% patients with staples had abnormal healing (p value 0.39). Total 10 patients (3.33%), 5 in each group, underwent resuturing within 6 weeks post-operatively. Staples reduced skin closure time as compared to sutures (p value <0.001). Mean pain score was comparable between two groups on day 3 post-operatively (p value 0.08) and at 6 weeks (p value 0.45). Patient satisfaction score considering the appearance and comfort of scar was comparable between both groups (p value 0.25).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Staples and subcuticular sutures are equivalent to each other, and the choice of skin closure material is at the discretion of the surgeon.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India\",\"volume\":\"75 Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"430-436\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12085501/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-024-02040-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-024-02040-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patient Satisfaction After Subcuticular Sutures and Metallic Staples for Skin Closure in Caesarean Section: A Randomized Study at a Tertiary Centre.
Background: A variety of materials and techniques are used for skin closure after caesarean section (CS), common ones being sutures and staples. The technique chosen should be simple, quick, painless, and provide good cosmesis with least wound complications, and there is a need to identify which provides the best outcome.
Objectives: The aim was to compare metallic surgical staples versus subcuticular sutures for skin closure after caesarean delivery in terms of wound complications, skin closure time, pain score on day 3, and patient satisfaction after 6 weeks.
Materials and methods: A total of 300 women undergoing CS with Pfannenstiel incision were randomized into two groups using sealed envelopes. Skin closure was done, and time was noted simultaneously. Wound condition and pain score were assessed on day 3 and 6 weeks post-operatively.
Results: On day 3 post-operatively, 22% patients in each group had abnormal healing. After 6 weeks, 1.37% patients with sutures and 3.44% patients with staples had abnormal healing (p value 0.39). Total 10 patients (3.33%), 5 in each group, underwent resuturing within 6 weeks post-operatively. Staples reduced skin closure time as compared to sutures (p value <0.001). Mean pain score was comparable between two groups on day 3 post-operatively (p value 0.08) and at 6 weeks (p value 0.45). Patient satisfaction score considering the appearance and comfort of scar was comparable between both groups (p value 0.25).
Conclusion: Staples and subcuticular sutures are equivalent to each other, and the choice of skin closure material is at the discretion of the surgeon.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India (JOGI) is the official journal of the Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology Societies of India (FOGSI). This is a peer- reviewed journal and features articles pertaining to the field of obstetrics and gynecology. The Journal is published six times a year on a bimonthly basis. Articles contributed by clinicians involved in patient care and research, and basic science researchers are considered. It publishes clinical and basic research of all aspects of obstetrics and gynecology, community obstetrics and family welfare and subspecialty subjects including gynecological endoscopy, infertility, oncology and ultrasonography, provided they have scientific merit and represent an important advance in knowledge. The journal believes in diversity and welcomes and encourages relevant contributions from world over. The types of articles published are: · Original Article· Case Report · Instrumentation and Techniques · Short Commentary · Correspondence (Letter to the Editor) · Pictorial Essay