选择离子监测-扫描相结合的GC-EI-MS方法的开发和验证。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Claire Phelps MS, Emma K. Hardwick BA, Alleigh N. Couch BS, J. Tyler Davidson PhD
{"title":"选择离子监测-扫描相结合的GC-EI-MS方法的开发和验证。","authors":"Claire Phelps MS,&nbsp;Emma K. Hardwick BA,&nbsp;Alleigh N. Couch BS,&nbsp;J. Tyler Davidson PhD","doi":"10.1111/1556-4029.70084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Novel synthetic opioids (NSOs) emerged during the third wave of the opioid epidemic, which has resulted in countless overdose deaths. Although fentanyl and fentanyl analogs are the most common NSOs, changing legislation in China and the United States led to the emergence of another class of NSOs, known as nitazene analogs. Nitazene analogs are very potent, and given their increasing prevalence in seized drug casework, it is imperative that seized drug laboratories have sufficient methods to identify nitazene analogs. This study developed a combined selected ion monitoring (SIM)-scan method to identify 20 nitazene analogs using gas chromatography-electron ionization-mass spectrometry (GC-EI-MS). The method was evaluated in terms of the limit of detection (LOD), carryover, selectivity, repeatability, reproducibility, and processed sample stability. The LOD for the targeted nitazene analogs ranged from 5 to 10 ppm due to increased sensitivity through SIM acquisition. No carryover was observed, and all nitazene analogs could be differentiated from other analogs and common interferences. The repeatability and reproducibility of the method were demonstrated qualitatively. All nitazene analogs were stable at room temperature for at least 24 hours. When applied to the analysis of blind simulant samples, 33 out of 35 samples were correctly identified, with the two misidentifications being due to ion ratios outside of tolerance. Likewise, two authentic nitazene analog casework samples were also correctly identified. The validated SIM-scan method provides a potential solution to identify low concentration nitazene analogs in seized drug casework that might otherwise be missed using routine GC–MS full scan acquisition.</p>","PeriodicalId":15743,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic sciences","volume":"70 5","pages":"1949-1962"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of a combined selected ion monitoring-scan GC-EI-MS method for nitazene analogs\",\"authors\":\"Claire Phelps MS,&nbsp;Emma K. Hardwick BA,&nbsp;Alleigh N. Couch BS,&nbsp;J. Tyler Davidson PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1556-4029.70084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Novel synthetic opioids (NSOs) emerged during the third wave of the opioid epidemic, which has resulted in countless overdose deaths. Although fentanyl and fentanyl analogs are the most common NSOs, changing legislation in China and the United States led to the emergence of another class of NSOs, known as nitazene analogs. Nitazene analogs are very potent, and given their increasing prevalence in seized drug casework, it is imperative that seized drug laboratories have sufficient methods to identify nitazene analogs. This study developed a combined selected ion monitoring (SIM)-scan method to identify 20 nitazene analogs using gas chromatography-electron ionization-mass spectrometry (GC-EI-MS). The method was evaluated in terms of the limit of detection (LOD), carryover, selectivity, repeatability, reproducibility, and processed sample stability. The LOD for the targeted nitazene analogs ranged from 5 to 10 ppm due to increased sensitivity through SIM acquisition. No carryover was observed, and all nitazene analogs could be differentiated from other analogs and common interferences. The repeatability and reproducibility of the method were demonstrated qualitatively. All nitazene analogs were stable at room temperature for at least 24 hours. When applied to the analysis of blind simulant samples, 33 out of 35 samples were correctly identified, with the two misidentifications being due to ion ratios outside of tolerance. Likewise, two authentic nitazene analog casework samples were also correctly identified. The validated SIM-scan method provides a potential solution to identify low concentration nitazene analogs in seized drug casework that might otherwise be missed using routine GC–MS full scan acquisition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of forensic sciences\",\"volume\":\"70 5\",\"pages\":\"1949-1962\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of forensic sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1556-4029.70084\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1556-4029.70084","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新型合成阿片类药物(nso)在阿片类药物流行的第三波浪潮中出现,导致无数过量死亡。虽然芬太尼和芬太尼类似物是最常见的非物质社会组织,但中国和美国不断变化的立法导致了另一类非物质社会组织的出现,即尼塔尼类似物。Nitazene类似物是非常有效的,鉴于它们在查获的毒品案件中越来越普遍,查获的药物实验室必须有足够的方法来识别Nitazene类似物。本研究采用气相色谱-电子电离-质谱(GC-EI-MS)联合选择离子监测(SIM)-扫描方法鉴定了20种nitazene类似物。从检出限(LOD)、携带性、选择性、重复性、再现性和处理样品稳定性等方面对该方法进行了评价。由于通过SIM采集提高了灵敏度,目标nitazene类似物的LOD范围为5至10 ppm。没有观察到结转现象,所有的nitazene类似物都能与其他类似物和常见干扰物区分开来。定性验证了该方法的重复性和再现性。所有nitazene类似物在室温下至少稳定24小时。当应用于盲模拟样品的分析时,35个样品中有33个被正确识别,其中两个错误识别是由于离子比超出公差。同样,两个真实的nitazene模拟案例样本也被正确识别。经过验证的sim扫描方法提供了一种潜在的解决方案,可以在查获的毒品案件中识别低浓度的nitazene类似物,否则常规的GC-MS全扫描采集可能会错过。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and validation of a combined selected ion monitoring-scan GC-EI-MS method for nitazene analogs

Novel synthetic opioids (NSOs) emerged during the third wave of the opioid epidemic, which has resulted in countless overdose deaths. Although fentanyl and fentanyl analogs are the most common NSOs, changing legislation in China and the United States led to the emergence of another class of NSOs, known as nitazene analogs. Nitazene analogs are very potent, and given their increasing prevalence in seized drug casework, it is imperative that seized drug laboratories have sufficient methods to identify nitazene analogs. This study developed a combined selected ion monitoring (SIM)-scan method to identify 20 nitazene analogs using gas chromatography-electron ionization-mass spectrometry (GC-EI-MS). The method was evaluated in terms of the limit of detection (LOD), carryover, selectivity, repeatability, reproducibility, and processed sample stability. The LOD for the targeted nitazene analogs ranged from 5 to 10 ppm due to increased sensitivity through SIM acquisition. No carryover was observed, and all nitazene analogs could be differentiated from other analogs and common interferences. The repeatability and reproducibility of the method were demonstrated qualitatively. All nitazene analogs were stable at room temperature for at least 24 hours. When applied to the analysis of blind simulant samples, 33 out of 35 samples were correctly identified, with the two misidentifications being due to ion ratios outside of tolerance. Likewise, two authentic nitazene analog casework samples were also correctly identified. The validated SIM-scan method provides a potential solution to identify low concentration nitazene analogs in seized drug casework that might otherwise be missed using routine GC–MS full scan acquisition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of forensic sciences
Journal of forensic sciences 医学-医学:法
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
215
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Forensic Sciences (JFS) is the official publication of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS). It is devoted to the publication of original investigations, observations, scholarly inquiries and reviews in various branches of the forensic sciences. These include anthropology, criminalistics, digital and multimedia sciences, engineering and applied sciences, pathology/biology, psychiatry and behavioral science, jurisprudence, odontology, questioned documents, and toxicology. Similar submissions dealing with forensic aspects of other sciences and the social sciences are also accepted, as are submissions dealing with scientifically sound emerging science disciplines. The content and/or views expressed in the JFS are not necessarily those of the AAFS, the JFS Editorial Board, the organizations with which authors are affiliated, or the publisher of JFS. All manuscript submissions are double-blind peer-reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信