影响重症儿童肠内喂养的因素:定性证据综合。

IF 1.9 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Elisabeth Søiland, Claire Glenton, Susan Munabi-Babigumira, Lena Victoria Nordheim, Suzgika Lakudzala, Idriss Ibrahim Kallon, Celeste Naude, Amanda Brand, Simon Lewin, Nyanyiwe Masingi Mbeye
{"title":"影响重症儿童肠内喂养的因素:定性证据综合。","authors":"Elisabeth Søiland, Claire Glenton, Susan Munabi-Babigumira, Lena Victoria Nordheim, Suzgika Lakudzala, Idriss Ibrahim Kallon, Celeste Naude, Amanda Brand, Simon Lewin, Nyanyiwe Masingi Mbeye","doi":"10.1186/s40795-025-01077-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This review aims to explore factors associated with the provision of enteral nutrition in critically ill children in intensive care. Critically ill children are at risk of becoming malnourished, which can lead to poorer outcomes such as longer hospital stays, increased readmissions, and increased mortality. Optimal enteral feeding can help prevent and manage malnutrition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and Scopus from inception to July 3, 2023. We included qualitative studies and mixed-methods studies. As we anticipated few studies in critical care settings, we included studies that focused on experiences and perceptions of any stakeholders involved in enteral feeding in children in any hospital setting to provide indirect evidence. Titles, abstracts and potentially eligible full-text records were independently assessed. We extracted descriptive data and used a thematic analysis approach to synthesise the study data. We used the GRADE-CERQual approach to assess our confidence in each finding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 14 studies, with four from critical care settings. Where we had concerns that the context of the studies may be less relevant to the setting, intervention and population of interest, we indicated this inour GRADE-CERQual assessment. We had moderate, low or very low confidence in our findings, in part due to the indirectness of the evidence. Moderate confidence findings indicated that parents were concerned about discomfort and side effects, and that a lack of resources could be a barrier to providing optimal nutritional support. Low confidence findings suggested that healthcare workers lacked the knowledge and skills to provide adequate nutritional support, and that receiving support, information, and participating in decision-making around enteral feeding was important to some parents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our review points to several factors that may influence the provision of enteral feeding for critically ill children. More qualitative research on healthcare workers' nutritional support practices, particularly in critical care settings, is needed to provide a better understanding of the barriers to optimal enteral feeding in critically ill children.</p>","PeriodicalId":36422,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nutrition","volume":"11 1","pages":"98"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12087210/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors that influence the provision of enteral feeding for critically ill children: a qualitative evidence synthesis.\",\"authors\":\"Elisabeth Søiland, Claire Glenton, Susan Munabi-Babigumira, Lena Victoria Nordheim, Suzgika Lakudzala, Idriss Ibrahim Kallon, Celeste Naude, Amanda Brand, Simon Lewin, Nyanyiwe Masingi Mbeye\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40795-025-01077-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This review aims to explore factors associated with the provision of enteral nutrition in critically ill children in intensive care. Critically ill children are at risk of becoming malnourished, which can lead to poorer outcomes such as longer hospital stays, increased readmissions, and increased mortality. Optimal enteral feeding can help prevent and manage malnutrition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and Scopus from inception to July 3, 2023. We included qualitative studies and mixed-methods studies. As we anticipated few studies in critical care settings, we included studies that focused on experiences and perceptions of any stakeholders involved in enteral feeding in children in any hospital setting to provide indirect evidence. Titles, abstracts and potentially eligible full-text records were independently assessed. We extracted descriptive data and used a thematic analysis approach to synthesise the study data. We used the GRADE-CERQual approach to assess our confidence in each finding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 14 studies, with four from critical care settings. Where we had concerns that the context of the studies may be less relevant to the setting, intervention and population of interest, we indicated this inour GRADE-CERQual assessment. We had moderate, low or very low confidence in our findings, in part due to the indirectness of the evidence. Moderate confidence findings indicated that parents were concerned about discomfort and side effects, and that a lack of resources could be a barrier to providing optimal nutritional support. Low confidence findings suggested that healthcare workers lacked the knowledge and skills to provide adequate nutritional support, and that receiving support, information, and participating in decision-making around enteral feeding was important to some parents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our review points to several factors that may influence the provision of enteral feeding for critically ill children. More qualitative research on healthcare workers' nutritional support practices, particularly in critical care settings, is needed to provide a better understanding of the barriers to optimal enteral feeding in critically ill children.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"98\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12087210/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-025-01077-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-025-01077-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本综述旨在探讨重症儿童肠内营养提供的相关因素。危重儿童面临营养不良的风险,这可能导致较差的结果,如住院时间更长、再入院人数增加和死亡率增加。最佳肠内喂养有助于预防和管理营养不良。方法:检索MEDLINE、CINAHL、Embase和Scopus自成立至2023年7月3日的文献。我们纳入了定性研究和混合方法研究。由于我们预计在重症监护环境中很少有研究,因此我们纳入了关注任何医院环境中参与儿童肠内喂养的任何利益相关者的经验和看法的研究,以提供间接证据。题目、摘要和可能符合条件的全文记录被独立评估。我们提取描述性数据,并使用专题分析方法来综合研究数据。我们使用GRADE-CERQual方法来评估我们对每个发现的信心。结果:我们纳入了14项研究,其中4项来自重症监护病房。当我们担心研究的背景可能与环境、干预措施和感兴趣的人群不太相关时,我们在GRADE-CERQual评估中指出了这一点。我们对我们的研究结果有中等、低或非常低的信心,部分原因是证据的间接性。适度的信心调查结果表明,父母担心不适和副作用,缺乏资源可能是提供最佳营养支持的障碍。低信心调查结果表明,卫生保健工作者缺乏提供足够营养支持的知识和技能,对一些父母来说,获得支持、信息和参与肠内喂养的决策是很重要的。结论:我们的综述指出了几个可能影响重症儿童肠内喂养的因素。需要对卫生保健工作者的营养支持做法进行更多的定性研究,特别是在重症监护环境中,以便更好地了解重症儿童最佳肠内喂养的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors that influence the provision of enteral feeding for critically ill children: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Background: This review aims to explore factors associated with the provision of enteral nutrition in critically ill children in intensive care. Critically ill children are at risk of becoming malnourished, which can lead to poorer outcomes such as longer hospital stays, increased readmissions, and increased mortality. Optimal enteral feeding can help prevent and manage malnutrition.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and Scopus from inception to July 3, 2023. We included qualitative studies and mixed-methods studies. As we anticipated few studies in critical care settings, we included studies that focused on experiences and perceptions of any stakeholders involved in enteral feeding in children in any hospital setting to provide indirect evidence. Titles, abstracts and potentially eligible full-text records were independently assessed. We extracted descriptive data and used a thematic analysis approach to synthesise the study data. We used the GRADE-CERQual approach to assess our confidence in each finding.

Results: We included 14 studies, with four from critical care settings. Where we had concerns that the context of the studies may be less relevant to the setting, intervention and population of interest, we indicated this inour GRADE-CERQual assessment. We had moderate, low or very low confidence in our findings, in part due to the indirectness of the evidence. Moderate confidence findings indicated that parents were concerned about discomfort and side effects, and that a lack of resources could be a barrier to providing optimal nutritional support. Low confidence findings suggested that healthcare workers lacked the knowledge and skills to provide adequate nutritional support, and that receiving support, information, and participating in decision-making around enteral feeding was important to some parents.

Conclusions: Our review points to several factors that may influence the provision of enteral feeding for critically ill children. More qualitative research on healthcare workers' nutritional support practices, particularly in critical care settings, is needed to provide a better understanding of the barriers to optimal enteral feeding in critically ill children.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nutrition
BMC Nutrition Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信