Julia Quinn Fouts, Silvia Grossi, Juan M Tricarico, Ermias Kebreab
{"title":"给奶牛脉冲剂量混合精油对肠道甲烷排放和生产力的影响。","authors":"Julia Quinn Fouts, Silvia Grossi, Juan M Tricarico, Ermias Kebreab","doi":"10.1093/tas/txaf056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective was to investigate the effects of pulse-dosing the essential oil blend, Agolin Ruminant (EOB), to dairy cows on methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) production (g/d) and intensity (g/kg milk or energy-corrected milk (ECM)), as well as lactation performance, on a commercial farm. Seventy-two multiparous, mid-lactation cows were blocked by days in milk, parity, and milk yield and housed in a single pen. After a 2-wk covariate period, cows within each block were randomly assigned to one of two treatments for 10 wk: Control (blank pellets) and EOBP (blank pellets and EOB pellets). The pellets were delivered through double-hopper GreenFeed (GF) units. Hopper 1 of each GF unit contained EOB pellets, formulated to supply ~1 g EOB from the first daily drop of pellets for each EOBP cow. Hopper 2 dispensed blank pellets for the remaining daily drops to EOBP cows and for all drops to Control cows. Enteric gases were measured via the GF units. Milk yields and components were obtained twice weekly, and dry matter intake (DMI) was calculated weekly using milk data, body weight, and body condition score. Overall, cows receiving EOB tended to have lower milk lactose concentration. In week 7, EOBP cows outperformed Control cows in milk yield, ECM, yields of milk protein, lactose, and solids-nonfat, modeled DMI, and CH<sub>4</sub> intensity. Inherent limitations of administering EOB through the GF units, as well as a low number of CH<sub>4</sub> measurements occurring after peak fermentation, may have contributed to the lack of consistent treatment differences. Our efforts to administer a feed additive to individual cows, and our consideration of how farm management practices influenced the results, contribute to the progress of on-farm CH<sub>4</sub> research.</p>","PeriodicalId":23272,"journal":{"name":"Translational Animal Science","volume":"9 ","pages":"txaf056"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086541/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of pulse-dosing an essential oil blend to dairy cows on enteric methane emissions and productivity.\",\"authors\":\"Julia Quinn Fouts, Silvia Grossi, Juan M Tricarico, Ermias Kebreab\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tas/txaf056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The objective was to investigate the effects of pulse-dosing the essential oil blend, Agolin Ruminant (EOB), to dairy cows on methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) production (g/d) and intensity (g/kg milk or energy-corrected milk (ECM)), as well as lactation performance, on a commercial farm. Seventy-two multiparous, mid-lactation cows were blocked by days in milk, parity, and milk yield and housed in a single pen. After a 2-wk covariate period, cows within each block were randomly assigned to one of two treatments for 10 wk: Control (blank pellets) and EOBP (blank pellets and EOB pellets). The pellets were delivered through double-hopper GreenFeed (GF) units. Hopper 1 of each GF unit contained EOB pellets, formulated to supply ~1 g EOB from the first daily drop of pellets for each EOBP cow. Hopper 2 dispensed blank pellets for the remaining daily drops to EOBP cows and for all drops to Control cows. Enteric gases were measured via the GF units. Milk yields and components were obtained twice weekly, and dry matter intake (DMI) was calculated weekly using milk data, body weight, and body condition score. Overall, cows receiving EOB tended to have lower milk lactose concentration. In week 7, EOBP cows outperformed Control cows in milk yield, ECM, yields of milk protein, lactose, and solids-nonfat, modeled DMI, and CH<sub>4</sub> intensity. Inherent limitations of administering EOB through the GF units, as well as a low number of CH<sub>4</sub> measurements occurring after peak fermentation, may have contributed to the lack of consistent treatment differences. Our efforts to administer a feed additive to individual cows, and our consideration of how farm management practices influenced the results, contribute to the progress of on-farm CH<sub>4</sub> research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Animal Science\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"txaf056\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086541/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Animal Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaf056\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaf056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of pulse-dosing an essential oil blend to dairy cows on enteric methane emissions and productivity.
The objective was to investigate the effects of pulse-dosing the essential oil blend, Agolin Ruminant (EOB), to dairy cows on methane (CH4) production (g/d) and intensity (g/kg milk or energy-corrected milk (ECM)), as well as lactation performance, on a commercial farm. Seventy-two multiparous, mid-lactation cows were blocked by days in milk, parity, and milk yield and housed in a single pen. After a 2-wk covariate period, cows within each block were randomly assigned to one of two treatments for 10 wk: Control (blank pellets) and EOBP (blank pellets and EOB pellets). The pellets were delivered through double-hopper GreenFeed (GF) units. Hopper 1 of each GF unit contained EOB pellets, formulated to supply ~1 g EOB from the first daily drop of pellets for each EOBP cow. Hopper 2 dispensed blank pellets for the remaining daily drops to EOBP cows and for all drops to Control cows. Enteric gases were measured via the GF units. Milk yields and components were obtained twice weekly, and dry matter intake (DMI) was calculated weekly using milk data, body weight, and body condition score. Overall, cows receiving EOB tended to have lower milk lactose concentration. In week 7, EOBP cows outperformed Control cows in milk yield, ECM, yields of milk protein, lactose, and solids-nonfat, modeled DMI, and CH4 intensity. Inherent limitations of administering EOB through the GF units, as well as a low number of CH4 measurements occurring after peak fermentation, may have contributed to the lack of consistent treatment differences. Our efforts to administer a feed additive to individual cows, and our consideration of how farm management practices influenced the results, contribute to the progress of on-farm CH4 research.
期刊介绍:
Translational Animal Science (TAS) is the first open access-open review animal science journal, encompassing a broad scope of research topics in animal science. TAS focuses on translating basic science to innovation, and validation of these innovations by various segments of the allied animal industry. Readers of TAS will typically represent education, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, extension, management, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Those interested in TAS typically include animal breeders, economists, embryologists, engineers, food scientists, geneticists, microbiologists, nutritionists, veterinarians, physiologists, processors, public health professionals, and others with an interest in animal production and applied aspects of animal sciences.