给奶牛脉冲剂量混合精油对肠道甲烷排放和生产力的影响。

IF 1.3 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Translational Animal Science Pub Date : 2025-04-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/tas/txaf056
Julia Quinn Fouts, Silvia Grossi, Juan M Tricarico, Ermias Kebreab
{"title":"给奶牛脉冲剂量混合精油对肠道甲烷排放和生产力的影响。","authors":"Julia Quinn Fouts, Silvia Grossi, Juan M Tricarico, Ermias Kebreab","doi":"10.1093/tas/txaf056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective was to investigate the effects of pulse-dosing the essential oil blend, Agolin Ruminant (EOB), to dairy cows on methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) production (g/d) and intensity (g/kg milk or energy-corrected milk (ECM)), as well as lactation performance, on a commercial farm. Seventy-two multiparous, mid-lactation cows were blocked by days in milk, parity, and milk yield and housed in a single pen. After a 2-wk covariate period, cows within each block were randomly assigned to one of two treatments for 10 wk: Control (blank pellets) and EOBP (blank pellets and EOB pellets). The pellets were delivered through double-hopper GreenFeed (GF) units. Hopper 1 of each GF unit contained EOB pellets, formulated to supply ~1 g EOB from the first daily drop of pellets for each EOBP cow. Hopper 2 dispensed blank pellets for the remaining daily drops to EOBP cows and for all drops to Control cows. Enteric gases were measured via the GF units. Milk yields and components were obtained twice weekly, and dry matter intake (DMI) was calculated weekly using milk data, body weight, and body condition score. Overall, cows receiving EOB tended to have lower milk lactose concentration. In week 7, EOBP cows outperformed Control cows in milk yield, ECM, yields of milk protein, lactose, and solids-nonfat, modeled DMI, and CH<sub>4</sub> intensity. Inherent limitations of administering EOB through the GF units, as well as a low number of CH<sub>4</sub> measurements occurring after peak fermentation, may have contributed to the lack of consistent treatment differences. Our efforts to administer a feed additive to individual cows, and our consideration of how farm management practices influenced the results, contribute to the progress of on-farm CH<sub>4</sub> research.</p>","PeriodicalId":23272,"journal":{"name":"Translational Animal Science","volume":"9 ","pages":"txaf056"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086541/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of pulse-dosing an essential oil blend to dairy cows on enteric methane emissions and productivity.\",\"authors\":\"Julia Quinn Fouts, Silvia Grossi, Juan M Tricarico, Ermias Kebreab\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tas/txaf056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The objective was to investigate the effects of pulse-dosing the essential oil blend, Agolin Ruminant (EOB), to dairy cows on methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) production (g/d) and intensity (g/kg milk or energy-corrected milk (ECM)), as well as lactation performance, on a commercial farm. Seventy-two multiparous, mid-lactation cows were blocked by days in milk, parity, and milk yield and housed in a single pen. After a 2-wk covariate period, cows within each block were randomly assigned to one of two treatments for 10 wk: Control (blank pellets) and EOBP (blank pellets and EOB pellets). The pellets were delivered through double-hopper GreenFeed (GF) units. Hopper 1 of each GF unit contained EOB pellets, formulated to supply ~1 g EOB from the first daily drop of pellets for each EOBP cow. Hopper 2 dispensed blank pellets for the remaining daily drops to EOBP cows and for all drops to Control cows. Enteric gases were measured via the GF units. Milk yields and components were obtained twice weekly, and dry matter intake (DMI) was calculated weekly using milk data, body weight, and body condition score. Overall, cows receiving EOB tended to have lower milk lactose concentration. In week 7, EOBP cows outperformed Control cows in milk yield, ECM, yields of milk protein, lactose, and solids-nonfat, modeled DMI, and CH<sub>4</sub> intensity. Inherent limitations of administering EOB through the GF units, as well as a low number of CH<sub>4</sub> measurements occurring after peak fermentation, may have contributed to the lack of consistent treatment differences. Our efforts to administer a feed additive to individual cows, and our consideration of how farm management practices influenced the results, contribute to the progress of on-farm CH<sub>4</sub> research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Animal Science\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"txaf056\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086541/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Animal Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaf056\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaf056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本试验旨在研究在一个商业农场,对奶牛脉冲给药Agolin反刍(EOB)精油混合物对甲烷(CH4)产量(g/d)和强度(g/kg奶或能量校正奶(ECM))以及泌乳性能的影响。72头多产、泌乳中期的奶牛按产奶量、胎次和产奶量的天数进行隔离,并被关在一个猪圈里。在2周的协变量期后,每个区块内的奶牛被随机分配到两种处理中的一种,为期10周:对照组(空白颗粒)和EOBP(空白颗粒和EOB颗粒)。颗粒通过双料斗GreenFeed (GF)装置输送。每个GF单元的料斗1包含EOB颗粒,配方为每头EOBP奶牛每天第一滴颗粒提供约1克EOB。料斗2将剩余每日滴剂的空白颗粒分配给EOBP奶牛,并将所有滴剂分配给对照组奶牛。肠内气体通过GF单位测量。每周计算两次产奶量和成分,每周根据泌乳数据、体重和体况评分计算干物质采食量(DMI)。总体而言,饲喂EOB的奶牛乳糖浓度较低。在第7周,EOBP奶牛的产奶量、ECM、乳蛋白、乳糖和非脂肪固体物产量、模型DMI和CH4强度均优于对照组奶牛。通过GF装置施用EOB的固有局限性,以及发酵高峰后发生的少量CH4测量,可能导致缺乏一致的处理差异。我们在奶牛个体中添加饲料添加剂的努力,以及我们对农场管理实践如何影响结果的考虑,有助于农场CH4研究的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of pulse-dosing an essential oil blend to dairy cows on enteric methane emissions and productivity.

The objective was to investigate the effects of pulse-dosing the essential oil blend, Agolin Ruminant (EOB), to dairy cows on methane (CH4) production (g/d) and intensity (g/kg milk or energy-corrected milk (ECM)), as well as lactation performance, on a commercial farm. Seventy-two multiparous, mid-lactation cows were blocked by days in milk, parity, and milk yield and housed in a single pen. After a 2-wk covariate period, cows within each block were randomly assigned to one of two treatments for 10 wk: Control (blank pellets) and EOBP (blank pellets and EOB pellets). The pellets were delivered through double-hopper GreenFeed (GF) units. Hopper 1 of each GF unit contained EOB pellets, formulated to supply ~1 g EOB from the first daily drop of pellets for each EOBP cow. Hopper 2 dispensed blank pellets for the remaining daily drops to EOBP cows and for all drops to Control cows. Enteric gases were measured via the GF units. Milk yields and components were obtained twice weekly, and dry matter intake (DMI) was calculated weekly using milk data, body weight, and body condition score. Overall, cows receiving EOB tended to have lower milk lactose concentration. In week 7, EOBP cows outperformed Control cows in milk yield, ECM, yields of milk protein, lactose, and solids-nonfat, modeled DMI, and CH4 intensity. Inherent limitations of administering EOB through the GF units, as well as a low number of CH4 measurements occurring after peak fermentation, may have contributed to the lack of consistent treatment differences. Our efforts to administer a feed additive to individual cows, and our consideration of how farm management practices influenced the results, contribute to the progress of on-farm CH4 research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Animal Science
Translational Animal Science Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Animal Science (TAS) is the first open access-open review animal science journal, encompassing a broad scope of research topics in animal science. TAS focuses on translating basic science to innovation, and validation of these innovations by various segments of the allied animal industry. Readers of TAS will typically represent education, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, extension, management, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Those interested in TAS typically include animal breeders, economists, embryologists, engineers, food scientists, geneticists, microbiologists, nutritionists, veterinarians, physiologists, processors, public health professionals, and others with an interest in animal production and applied aspects of animal sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信