利用市售LAMP检测和RDT诊断恶性疟原虫疟疾的极低寄生虫血症。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ruth O Payne, Nick J Edwards, Yrene Themistocleous, Sarah E Silk, Jordan R Barrett, Thomas A Rawlinson, Ian W Lim, Simon J Draper, Angela M Minassian
{"title":"利用市售LAMP检测和RDT诊断恶性疟原虫疟疾的极低寄生虫血症。","authors":"Ruth O Payne, Nick J Edwards, Yrene Themistocleous, Sarah E Silk, Jordan R Barrett, Thomas A Rawlinson, Ian W Lim, Simon J Draper, Angela M Minassian","doi":"10.1093/trstmh/traf050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malaria is the most common tropical infection in the UK. Current guidelines suggest that testing on 3 consecutive days is required following an initial negative result. This study aimed to see whether newer diagnostics (loop-mediated amplification assay [LAMP]) had sufficient sensitivity to support a change in diagnostic practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Blood samples from 11 participants who had undergone controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) with Plasmodium falciparum malaria were assessed from day 6 (C+6) for malaria positivity using the Carestart Malaria rapid diagnostic test (RDT) and from C+4 using the Alethia Malaria LAMP assay. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction had been performed twice daily during CHMI follow-up. A retrospective analysis of samples submitted to the Sheffield Teaching Hospitals for malaria testing over a 5-y period was conducted, evaluating the combination of the Carestart RDT alongside blood film analysis, as per UK guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In CHMI samples, LAMP was positive for all parasitaemias >1000 parasites/ml, whereas RDTs were less reliable (59% positive for parasitaemias >1000 parasites/ml). The combination of RDT and blood films for clinical samples diagnosed most infections, but only a minority of negative samples had subsequent tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LAMP has higher sensitivity than current UK recommended methods, with a potential to review the requirement for additional days of testing in the majority of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23218,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","volume":" ","pages":"1149-1156"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486384/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria at very low parasitaemias using a commercially available LAMP assay and RDT.\",\"authors\":\"Ruth O Payne, Nick J Edwards, Yrene Themistocleous, Sarah E Silk, Jordan R Barrett, Thomas A Rawlinson, Ian W Lim, Simon J Draper, Angela M Minassian\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/trstmh/traf050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malaria is the most common tropical infection in the UK. Current guidelines suggest that testing on 3 consecutive days is required following an initial negative result. This study aimed to see whether newer diagnostics (loop-mediated amplification assay [LAMP]) had sufficient sensitivity to support a change in diagnostic practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Blood samples from 11 participants who had undergone controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) with Plasmodium falciparum malaria were assessed from day 6 (C+6) for malaria positivity using the Carestart Malaria rapid diagnostic test (RDT) and from C+4 using the Alethia Malaria LAMP assay. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction had been performed twice daily during CHMI follow-up. A retrospective analysis of samples submitted to the Sheffield Teaching Hospitals for malaria testing over a 5-y period was conducted, evaluating the combination of the Carestart RDT alongside blood film analysis, as per UK guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In CHMI samples, LAMP was positive for all parasitaemias >1000 parasites/ml, whereas RDTs were less reliable (59% positive for parasitaemias >1000 parasites/ml). The combination of RDT and blood films for clinical samples diagnosed most infections, but only a minority of negative samples had subsequent tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LAMP has higher sensitivity than current UK recommended methods, with a potential to review the requirement for additional days of testing in the majority of patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1149-1156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486384/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/traf050\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/traf050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:疟疾是英国最常见的热带传染病。目前的指导方针建议,在初步结果为阴性后,需要连续3天进行检测。本研究旨在了解新的诊断方法(环介导扩增试验[LAMP])是否具有足够的灵敏度来支持诊断实践的改变。方法:从第6天(C+6)开始,使用Carestart疟疾快速诊断试验(RDT)对11例恶性疟原虫控制的人疟疾感染(CHMI)患者的血液样本进行疟疾阳性评估,从第4天开始使用Alethia疟疾LAMP检测。在CHMI随访期间每日进行两次定量聚合酶链反应。对提交给谢菲尔德教学医院进行5年疟疾检测的样本进行了回顾性分析,根据英国指南评估了Carestart RDT与血膜分析的结合。结果:在CHMI样品中,所有寄生虫血症>1000寄生虫/ml的LAMP阳性,而rdt的可靠性较低(59%的寄生虫血症>1000寄生虫/ml阳性)。临床样本的RDT和血片联合诊断出大多数感染,但只有少数阴性样本进行了后续检测。结论:LAMP比目前英国推荐的方法具有更高的敏感性,有可能审查大多数患者额外检测天数的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria at very low parasitaemias using a commercially available LAMP assay and RDT.

Diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria at very low parasitaemias using a commercially available LAMP assay and RDT.

Diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria at very low parasitaemias using a commercially available LAMP assay and RDT.

Background: Malaria is the most common tropical infection in the UK. Current guidelines suggest that testing on 3 consecutive days is required following an initial negative result. This study aimed to see whether newer diagnostics (loop-mediated amplification assay [LAMP]) had sufficient sensitivity to support a change in diagnostic practice.

Methods: Blood samples from 11 participants who had undergone controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) with Plasmodium falciparum malaria were assessed from day 6 (C+6) for malaria positivity using the Carestart Malaria rapid diagnostic test (RDT) and from C+4 using the Alethia Malaria LAMP assay. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction had been performed twice daily during CHMI follow-up. A retrospective analysis of samples submitted to the Sheffield Teaching Hospitals for malaria testing over a 5-y period was conducted, evaluating the combination of the Carestart RDT alongside blood film analysis, as per UK guidelines.

Results: In CHMI samples, LAMP was positive for all parasitaemias >1000 parasites/ml, whereas RDTs were less reliable (59% positive for parasitaemias >1000 parasites/ml). The combination of RDT and blood films for clinical samples diagnosed most infections, but only a minority of negative samples had subsequent tests.

Conclusions: LAMP has higher sensitivity than current UK recommended methods, with a potential to review the requirement for additional days of testing in the majority of patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
115
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene publishes authoritative and impactful original, peer-reviewed articles and reviews on all aspects of tropical medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信