剖宫产瘢痕腹壁子宫内膜异位症1例。

IF 0.9 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Marwa Aljbawi, Lana Redan, Ahmad Al-Bitar, Ebtihal Saghier
{"title":"剖宫产瘢痕腹壁子宫内膜异位症1例。","authors":"Marwa Aljbawi, Lana Redan, Ahmad Al-Bitar, Ebtihal Saghier","doi":"10.1186/s13256-025-05301-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endometriosis affects 6-15% of reproductive-aged women, with abdominal wall endometriosis occurring in 1-12% of extrapelvic cases. Cesarean scar endometriosis, the most common abdominal wall endometriosis subtype, arises in 0.03-3.5% of post-cesarean patients, often presenting as cyclical pain or a palpable mass near surgical scars. Diagnostic challenges stem from nonspecific symptoms and imaging overlap with granulomas, hernias, or tumors.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A 25-year-old female Arab patient presented with a 1.6 cm tender subcutaneous nodule adjacent to her Pfannenstiel scar, worsening during menses. Ultrasound revealed a hypoechoic nodule, while magnetic resonance imaging showed a 15 × 12 mm subcutaneous lesion with low T1 and intermediate T2 signals. Despite imaging favoring granuloma, clinical suspicion for cesarean scar endometriosis prompted wide surgical excision. Histopathology confirmed endometrial glands, stroma, and hemosiderin-laden macrophages, confirming abdominal wall endometriosis. Postoperatively, cyclical pain resolved, with no recurrence at the 2-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cesarean scar endometriosis, though rare, requires high clinical suspicion in patients with prior cesarean sections and cyclical symptoms. Multimodal imaging aids differentiation, but histopathology remains definitive. Surgical excision with clear margins is curative, preventing complications such as malignant transformation. This case highlights the interplay of surgical history, hormonal factors, and anatomical predisposition in cesarean scar endometriosis pathogenesis. Clinicians must prioritize early recognition and intervention to optimize outcomes in this underdiagnosed condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":16236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Case Reports","volume":"19 1","pages":"239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12090436/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abdominal wall endometriosis in a cesarean scar: a case report.\",\"authors\":\"Marwa Aljbawi, Lana Redan, Ahmad Al-Bitar, Ebtihal Saghier\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13256-025-05301-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endometriosis affects 6-15% of reproductive-aged women, with abdominal wall endometriosis occurring in 1-12% of extrapelvic cases. Cesarean scar endometriosis, the most common abdominal wall endometriosis subtype, arises in 0.03-3.5% of post-cesarean patients, often presenting as cyclical pain or a palpable mass near surgical scars. Diagnostic challenges stem from nonspecific symptoms and imaging overlap with granulomas, hernias, or tumors.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A 25-year-old female Arab patient presented with a 1.6 cm tender subcutaneous nodule adjacent to her Pfannenstiel scar, worsening during menses. Ultrasound revealed a hypoechoic nodule, while magnetic resonance imaging showed a 15 × 12 mm subcutaneous lesion with low T1 and intermediate T2 signals. Despite imaging favoring granuloma, clinical suspicion for cesarean scar endometriosis prompted wide surgical excision. Histopathology confirmed endometrial glands, stroma, and hemosiderin-laden macrophages, confirming abdominal wall endometriosis. Postoperatively, cyclical pain resolved, with no recurrence at the 2-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cesarean scar endometriosis, though rare, requires high clinical suspicion in patients with prior cesarean sections and cyclical symptoms. Multimodal imaging aids differentiation, but histopathology remains definitive. Surgical excision with clear margins is curative, preventing complications such as malignant transformation. This case highlights the interplay of surgical history, hormonal factors, and anatomical predisposition in cesarean scar endometriosis pathogenesis. Clinicians must prioritize early recognition and intervention to optimize outcomes in this underdiagnosed condition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Case Reports\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"239\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12090436/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Case Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-025-05301-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-025-05301-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:子宫内膜异位症影响6-15%的育龄妇女,腹壁子宫内膜异位症发生在1-12%的盆腔外病例。剖宫产瘢痕子宫内膜异位症是最常见的腹壁子宫内膜异位症亚型,在剖宫产后患者中发生率为0.03-3.5%,通常表现为周期性疼痛或手术疤痕附近可触及的肿块。诊断困难源于非特异性症状和影像与肉芽肿、疝或肿瘤重叠。病例介绍:一名25岁的阿拉伯女性患者,在她的Pfannenstiel疤痕附近有一个1.6厘米的柔软的皮下结节,在月经期间恶化。超声示低回声结节,磁共振示皮下15 × 12 mm病灶,T1低,T2中。尽管影像学倾向于肉芽肿,临床怀疑剖宫产瘢痕子宫内膜异位症促使广泛手术切除。组织病理学证实子宫内膜腺、间质和含铁血黄素巨噬细胞,证实腹壁子宫内膜异位症。术后周期性疼痛缓解,随访2个月无复发。结论:剖宫产瘢痕性子宫内膜异位症虽罕见,但有剖宫产史及周期性症状者需高度怀疑。多模态成像有助于鉴别,但组织病理学仍然是明确的。手术切除边缘清晰是可治愈的,可防止恶性转化等并发症。本病例强调手术史、激素因素和解剖易感性在剖宫产瘢痕子宫内膜异位症发病中的相互作用。临床医生必须优先考虑早期识别和干预,以优化这种未被诊断的疾病的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abdominal wall endometriosis in a cesarean scar: a case report.

Background: Endometriosis affects 6-15% of reproductive-aged women, with abdominal wall endometriosis occurring in 1-12% of extrapelvic cases. Cesarean scar endometriosis, the most common abdominal wall endometriosis subtype, arises in 0.03-3.5% of post-cesarean patients, often presenting as cyclical pain or a palpable mass near surgical scars. Diagnostic challenges stem from nonspecific symptoms and imaging overlap with granulomas, hernias, or tumors.

Case presentation: A 25-year-old female Arab patient presented with a 1.6 cm tender subcutaneous nodule adjacent to her Pfannenstiel scar, worsening during menses. Ultrasound revealed a hypoechoic nodule, while magnetic resonance imaging showed a 15 × 12 mm subcutaneous lesion with low T1 and intermediate T2 signals. Despite imaging favoring granuloma, clinical suspicion for cesarean scar endometriosis prompted wide surgical excision. Histopathology confirmed endometrial glands, stroma, and hemosiderin-laden macrophages, confirming abdominal wall endometriosis. Postoperatively, cyclical pain resolved, with no recurrence at the 2-month follow-up.

Conclusion: Cesarean scar endometriosis, though rare, requires high clinical suspicion in patients with prior cesarean sections and cyclical symptoms. Multimodal imaging aids differentiation, but histopathology remains definitive. Surgical excision with clear margins is curative, preventing complications such as malignant transformation. This case highlights the interplay of surgical history, hormonal factors, and anatomical predisposition in cesarean scar endometriosis pathogenesis. Clinicians must prioritize early recognition and intervention to optimize outcomes in this underdiagnosed condition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Case Reports
Journal of Medical Case Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
436
期刊介绍: JMCR is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that will consider any original case report that expands the field of general medical knowledge. Reports should show one of the following: 1. Unreported or unusual side effects or adverse interactions involving medications 2. Unexpected or unusual presentations of a disease 3. New associations or variations in disease processes 4. Presentations, diagnoses and/or management of new and emerging diseases 5. An unexpected association between diseases or symptoms 6. An unexpected event in the course of observing or treating a patient 7. Findings that shed new light on the possible pathogenesis of a disease or an adverse effect
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信