Marwa Aljbawi, Lana Redan, Ahmad Al-Bitar, Ebtihal Saghier
{"title":"剖宫产瘢痕腹壁子宫内膜异位症1例。","authors":"Marwa Aljbawi, Lana Redan, Ahmad Al-Bitar, Ebtihal Saghier","doi":"10.1186/s13256-025-05301-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endometriosis affects 6-15% of reproductive-aged women, with abdominal wall endometriosis occurring in 1-12% of extrapelvic cases. Cesarean scar endometriosis, the most common abdominal wall endometriosis subtype, arises in 0.03-3.5% of post-cesarean patients, often presenting as cyclical pain or a palpable mass near surgical scars. Diagnostic challenges stem from nonspecific symptoms and imaging overlap with granulomas, hernias, or tumors.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A 25-year-old female Arab patient presented with a 1.6 cm tender subcutaneous nodule adjacent to her Pfannenstiel scar, worsening during menses. Ultrasound revealed a hypoechoic nodule, while magnetic resonance imaging showed a 15 × 12 mm subcutaneous lesion with low T1 and intermediate T2 signals. Despite imaging favoring granuloma, clinical suspicion for cesarean scar endometriosis prompted wide surgical excision. Histopathology confirmed endometrial glands, stroma, and hemosiderin-laden macrophages, confirming abdominal wall endometriosis. Postoperatively, cyclical pain resolved, with no recurrence at the 2-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cesarean scar endometriosis, though rare, requires high clinical suspicion in patients with prior cesarean sections and cyclical symptoms. Multimodal imaging aids differentiation, but histopathology remains definitive. Surgical excision with clear margins is curative, preventing complications such as malignant transformation. This case highlights the interplay of surgical history, hormonal factors, and anatomical predisposition in cesarean scar endometriosis pathogenesis. Clinicians must prioritize early recognition and intervention to optimize outcomes in this underdiagnosed condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":16236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Case Reports","volume":"19 1","pages":"239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12090436/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abdominal wall endometriosis in a cesarean scar: a case report.\",\"authors\":\"Marwa Aljbawi, Lana Redan, Ahmad Al-Bitar, Ebtihal Saghier\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13256-025-05301-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endometriosis affects 6-15% of reproductive-aged women, with abdominal wall endometriosis occurring in 1-12% of extrapelvic cases. Cesarean scar endometriosis, the most common abdominal wall endometriosis subtype, arises in 0.03-3.5% of post-cesarean patients, often presenting as cyclical pain or a palpable mass near surgical scars. Diagnostic challenges stem from nonspecific symptoms and imaging overlap with granulomas, hernias, or tumors.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A 25-year-old female Arab patient presented with a 1.6 cm tender subcutaneous nodule adjacent to her Pfannenstiel scar, worsening during menses. Ultrasound revealed a hypoechoic nodule, while magnetic resonance imaging showed a 15 × 12 mm subcutaneous lesion with low T1 and intermediate T2 signals. Despite imaging favoring granuloma, clinical suspicion for cesarean scar endometriosis prompted wide surgical excision. Histopathology confirmed endometrial glands, stroma, and hemosiderin-laden macrophages, confirming abdominal wall endometriosis. Postoperatively, cyclical pain resolved, with no recurrence at the 2-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cesarean scar endometriosis, though rare, requires high clinical suspicion in patients with prior cesarean sections and cyclical symptoms. Multimodal imaging aids differentiation, but histopathology remains definitive. Surgical excision with clear margins is curative, preventing complications such as malignant transformation. This case highlights the interplay of surgical history, hormonal factors, and anatomical predisposition in cesarean scar endometriosis pathogenesis. Clinicians must prioritize early recognition and intervention to optimize outcomes in this underdiagnosed condition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Case Reports\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"239\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12090436/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Case Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-025-05301-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-025-05301-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Abdominal wall endometriosis in a cesarean scar: a case report.
Background: Endometriosis affects 6-15% of reproductive-aged women, with abdominal wall endometriosis occurring in 1-12% of extrapelvic cases. Cesarean scar endometriosis, the most common abdominal wall endometriosis subtype, arises in 0.03-3.5% of post-cesarean patients, often presenting as cyclical pain or a palpable mass near surgical scars. Diagnostic challenges stem from nonspecific symptoms and imaging overlap with granulomas, hernias, or tumors.
Case presentation: A 25-year-old female Arab patient presented with a 1.6 cm tender subcutaneous nodule adjacent to her Pfannenstiel scar, worsening during menses. Ultrasound revealed a hypoechoic nodule, while magnetic resonance imaging showed a 15 × 12 mm subcutaneous lesion with low T1 and intermediate T2 signals. Despite imaging favoring granuloma, clinical suspicion for cesarean scar endometriosis prompted wide surgical excision. Histopathology confirmed endometrial glands, stroma, and hemosiderin-laden macrophages, confirming abdominal wall endometriosis. Postoperatively, cyclical pain resolved, with no recurrence at the 2-month follow-up.
Conclusion: Cesarean scar endometriosis, though rare, requires high clinical suspicion in patients with prior cesarean sections and cyclical symptoms. Multimodal imaging aids differentiation, but histopathology remains definitive. Surgical excision with clear margins is curative, preventing complications such as malignant transformation. This case highlights the interplay of surgical history, hormonal factors, and anatomical predisposition in cesarean scar endometriosis pathogenesis. Clinicians must prioritize early recognition and intervention to optimize outcomes in this underdiagnosed condition.
期刊介绍:
JMCR is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that will consider any original case report that expands the field of general medical knowledge. Reports should show one of the following: 1. Unreported or unusual side effects or adverse interactions involving medications 2. Unexpected or unusual presentations of a disease 3. New associations or variations in disease processes 4. Presentations, diagnoses and/or management of new and emerging diseases 5. An unexpected association between diseases or symptoms 6. An unexpected event in the course of observing or treating a patient 7. Findings that shed new light on the possible pathogenesis of a disease or an adverse effect