青少年自闭症谱系障碍多层次治疗效果评价。

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Gabriel Anton Auer, Paul Lukas Plener, Luise Poustka, Lilian Konicar
{"title":"青少年自闭症谱系障碍多层次治疗效果评价。","authors":"Gabriel Anton Auer, Paul Lukas Plener, Luise Poustka, Lilian Konicar","doi":"10.1186/s13034-025-00909-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aberrant resting state electroencephalography (rsEEG) is a well-established indicator of psychopathological brain activity in clinical disorders. In Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), a substantial body of research reports reduced Alpha activity in the electrocortical resting state of affected individuals. However, effective interventions based on neurophysiological patterns and objective biological markers of treatment outcome remain scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized controlled trial, the primary objective was to examine rsEEG changes in adolescents with ASD following 24 sessions of slow cortical potential neurofeedback training (n = 21) compared to a treatment-as-usual control group (n = 20). A repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to assess group differences over time. Additionally, Pearson correlation analyses were conducted to exploratorily investigate associations between rsEEG measures and clinical psychopathology and affective well-being, as assessed via parental and self-report questionnaires at baseline and post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses revealed significant differences in the development of rsEEG between the intervention groups: while Alpha activity increased in the experimental neurofeedback group, it decreased in the control group, demonstrating an opposite trend. Exploratory analyses showed that Delta activity decreased in both groups, with a more pronounced decrease in the experimental group. Correlational analyses revealed significant associations between subjective-psychological and electrocortical levels: lower alpha power at baseline was related to greater severity of ASD symptoms, while both lower alpha and higher delta power were associated with greater negative affect at baseline. Increases in alpha power after NF-training were linked with enhanced positive affect, whereas reductions in delta power corresponded to decreases in negative affect.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides insights into changes in resting-state neural activity before and after clinical interventions alongside clinical-psychological assessment, overcoming single-level assessments and emphasizing the need for multi-level outcome measures for a more comprehensive treatment evaluation.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>DRKS00012339.</p>","PeriodicalId":9934,"journal":{"name":"Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health","volume":"19 1","pages":"58"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12090636/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-level treatment outcome evaluation in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Anton Auer, Paul Lukas Plener, Luise Poustka, Lilian Konicar\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13034-025-00909-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aberrant resting state electroencephalography (rsEEG) is a well-established indicator of psychopathological brain activity in clinical disorders. In Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), a substantial body of research reports reduced Alpha activity in the electrocortical resting state of affected individuals. However, effective interventions based on neurophysiological patterns and objective biological markers of treatment outcome remain scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized controlled trial, the primary objective was to examine rsEEG changes in adolescents with ASD following 24 sessions of slow cortical potential neurofeedback training (n = 21) compared to a treatment-as-usual control group (n = 20). A repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to assess group differences over time. Additionally, Pearson correlation analyses were conducted to exploratorily investigate associations between rsEEG measures and clinical psychopathology and affective well-being, as assessed via parental and self-report questionnaires at baseline and post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses revealed significant differences in the development of rsEEG between the intervention groups: while Alpha activity increased in the experimental neurofeedback group, it decreased in the control group, demonstrating an opposite trend. Exploratory analyses showed that Delta activity decreased in both groups, with a more pronounced decrease in the experimental group. Correlational analyses revealed significant associations between subjective-psychological and electrocortical levels: lower alpha power at baseline was related to greater severity of ASD symptoms, while both lower alpha and higher delta power were associated with greater negative affect at baseline. Increases in alpha power after NF-training were linked with enhanced positive affect, whereas reductions in delta power corresponded to decreases in negative affect.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides insights into changes in resting-state neural activity before and after clinical interventions alongside clinical-psychological assessment, overcoming single-level assessments and emphasizing the need for multi-level outcome measures for a more comprehensive treatment evaluation.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>DRKS00012339.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12090636/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-025-00909-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13034-025-00909-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:异常静息状态脑电图(rsEEG)是临床疾病中公认的精神病理脑活动指标。在自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)中,大量的研究报告了受影响个体在电皮层静息状态下α活性的降低。然而,基于神经生理模式和治疗结果的客观生物学标记的有效干预措施仍然很少。方法:在这项随机对照试验中,主要目的是检查24次缓慢皮质电位神经反馈训练(n = 21)后青少年ASD患者的rsEEG变化,与常规治疗对照组(n = 20)相比。使用重复测量方差分析来评估组间随时间的差异。此外,在基线和干预后,通过父母和自我报告问卷评估rsEEG测量与临床精神病理学和情感幸福感之间的相关性,进行了Pearson相关分析。结果:分析显示干预组之间rsEEG的发展有显著差异:实验神经反馈组α活性增加,对照组α活性下降,呈现相反的趋势。探索性分析表明,两组的Delta活性都有所下降,实验组的下降更为明显。相关分析揭示了主观心理和皮层电水平之间的显著关联:基线时较低的α功率与ASD症状的严重程度有关,而基线时较低的α功率和较高的δ功率均与较大的负面影响相关。nf训练后α能量的增加与积极情绪的增强有关,而δ能量的减少与消极情绪的减少有关。结论:本研究提供了临床干预前后静息状态神经活动的变化以及临床心理评估,克服了单水平评估,强调了需要多层次的结果测量来进行更全面的治疗评估。临床试验注册号:DRKS00012339。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Multi-level treatment outcome evaluation in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder.

Multi-level treatment outcome evaluation in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder.

Multi-level treatment outcome evaluation in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder.

Multi-level treatment outcome evaluation in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder.

Background: Aberrant resting state electroencephalography (rsEEG) is a well-established indicator of psychopathological brain activity in clinical disorders. In Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), a substantial body of research reports reduced Alpha activity in the electrocortical resting state of affected individuals. However, effective interventions based on neurophysiological patterns and objective biological markers of treatment outcome remain scarce.

Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, the primary objective was to examine rsEEG changes in adolescents with ASD following 24 sessions of slow cortical potential neurofeedback training (n = 21) compared to a treatment-as-usual control group (n = 20). A repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to assess group differences over time. Additionally, Pearson correlation analyses were conducted to exploratorily investigate associations between rsEEG measures and clinical psychopathology and affective well-being, as assessed via parental and self-report questionnaires at baseline and post-intervention.

Results: Analyses revealed significant differences in the development of rsEEG between the intervention groups: while Alpha activity increased in the experimental neurofeedback group, it decreased in the control group, demonstrating an opposite trend. Exploratory analyses showed that Delta activity decreased in both groups, with a more pronounced decrease in the experimental group. Correlational analyses revealed significant associations between subjective-psychological and electrocortical levels: lower alpha power at baseline was related to greater severity of ASD symptoms, while both lower alpha and higher delta power were associated with greater negative affect at baseline. Increases in alpha power after NF-training were linked with enhanced positive affect, whereas reductions in delta power corresponded to decreases in negative affect.

Conclusions: This study provides insights into changes in resting-state neural activity before and after clinical interventions alongside clinical-psychological assessment, overcoming single-level assessments and emphasizing the need for multi-level outcome measures for a more comprehensive treatment evaluation.

Clinical trial registration: DRKS00012339.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health PEDIATRICSPSYCHIATRY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
84
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, the official journal of the International Association for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Allied Professions, is an open access, online journal that provides an international platform for rapid and comprehensive scientific communication on child and adolescent mental health across different cultural backgrounds. CAPMH serves as a scientifically rigorous and broadly open forum for both interdisciplinary and cross-cultural exchange of research information, involving psychiatrists, paediatricians, psychologists, neuroscientists, and allied disciplines. The journal focusses on improving the knowledge base for the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of mental health conditions in children and adolescents, and aims to integrate basic science, clinical research and the practical implementation of research findings. In addition, aspects which are still underrepresented in the traditional journals such as neurobiology and neuropsychology of psychiatric disorders in childhood and adolescence are considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信