哥伦比亚使用人工智能技术进行心血管风险评估。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2025-05-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/crp/2566839
Jared Agudelo, Oscar Bedoya, Oscar Muñoz-Velandia, Kevin David Rodriguez Belalcazar, Alvaro Ruiz-Morales
{"title":"哥伦比亚使用人工智能技术进行心血管风险评估。","authors":"Jared Agudelo, Oscar Bedoya, Oscar Muñoz-Velandia, Kevin David Rodriguez Belalcazar, Alvaro Ruiz-Morales","doi":"10.1155/crp/2566839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> There is no information on the potential of machine learning (ML)-based techniques to improve cardiovascular risk estimation in the Colombian population. This article presents innovative models using five artificial intelligence techniques: neural networks, decision trees, support vector machines, random forests, and Gaussian Bayesian networks. <b>Methods:</b> The research is based on a cohort of 847 patients free of cardiovascular disease at baseline and followed for cardiovascular disease events over 10 years at the Central Military Hospital in Bogotá, Colombia. To enhance the robustness and reduce the risk of overfitting, model evaluation was conducted using a 5-fold cross-validation on the entire dataset. Discriminatory ability was evaluated with the area under a ROC curve (AUC-ROC) for each ML-based model and the Framingham model. <b>Results:</b> Experimental results showed that the neural network technique had the best discriminative ability to predict cardiovascular events, with an AUC-ROC of 0.69 (CI 95% 0.622-0.759) for unbalanced data and 0.67 (CI 95% 0.601-0.754) for balanced data. Other ML techniques also showed good discriminatory ability with AUC-ROC values between 0.56 and 0.65, superior to that observed for the Framingham model (0.53; CI 95% 0.468-0.607). <b>Conclusion:</b> Our study supports the flexible ML approaches to cardiovascular risk prediction as a way forward for cardiovascular risk assessment in Colombia. Our data even suggest that risk prediction using these techniques could be even more discriminative than widely used risk-stimulation models such as Framingham, adapted to the Colombian population. However, new prospective studies need to validate our data before general implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9494,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research and Practice","volume":"2025 ","pages":"2566839"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086036/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cardiovascular Risk Estimation in Colombia Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques.\",\"authors\":\"Jared Agudelo, Oscar Bedoya, Oscar Muñoz-Velandia, Kevin David Rodriguez Belalcazar, Alvaro Ruiz-Morales\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/crp/2566839\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> There is no information on the potential of machine learning (ML)-based techniques to improve cardiovascular risk estimation in the Colombian population. This article presents innovative models using five artificial intelligence techniques: neural networks, decision trees, support vector machines, random forests, and Gaussian Bayesian networks. <b>Methods:</b> The research is based on a cohort of 847 patients free of cardiovascular disease at baseline and followed for cardiovascular disease events over 10 years at the Central Military Hospital in Bogotá, Colombia. To enhance the robustness and reduce the risk of overfitting, model evaluation was conducted using a 5-fold cross-validation on the entire dataset. Discriminatory ability was evaluated with the area under a ROC curve (AUC-ROC) for each ML-based model and the Framingham model. <b>Results:</b> Experimental results showed that the neural network technique had the best discriminative ability to predict cardiovascular events, with an AUC-ROC of 0.69 (CI 95% 0.622-0.759) for unbalanced data and 0.67 (CI 95% 0.601-0.754) for balanced data. Other ML techniques also showed good discriminatory ability with AUC-ROC values between 0.56 and 0.65, superior to that observed for the Framingham model (0.53; CI 95% 0.468-0.607). <b>Conclusion:</b> Our study supports the flexible ML approaches to cardiovascular risk prediction as a way forward for cardiovascular risk assessment in Colombia. Our data even suggest that risk prediction using these techniques could be even more discriminative than widely used risk-stimulation models such as Framingham, adapted to the Colombian population. However, new prospective studies need to validate our data before general implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"2566839\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086036/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/crp/2566839\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/crp/2566839","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前还没有关于机器学习(ML)技术在改善哥伦比亚人群心血管风险评估方面的潜力的信息。本文介绍了使用五种人工智能技术的创新模型:神经网络、决策树、支持向量机、随机森林和高斯贝叶斯网络。方法:该研究基于一组847名基线时无心血管疾病的患者,并在哥伦比亚波哥大中央军事医院随访心血管疾病事件超过10年。为了增强鲁棒性并降低过拟合的风险,对整个数据集进行了5倍交叉验证的模型评估。采用ROC曲线下面积(AUC-ROC)对每个基于ml的模型和Framingham模型进行判别能力评价。结果:实验结果表明,神经网络技术预测心血管事件的判别能力最好,不平衡数据的AUC-ROC为0.69 (CI 95% 0.622-0.759),平衡数据的AUC-ROC为0.67 (CI 95% 0.601-0.754)。其他ML技术也表现出良好的区分能力,AUC-ROC值在0.56 ~ 0.65之间,优于Framingham模型(0.53;Ci 95% 0.468-0.607)。结论:我们的研究支持将灵活的ML方法用于心血管风险预测,作为哥伦比亚心血管风险评估的前进方向。我们的数据甚至表明,使用这些技术的风险预测可能比广泛使用的风险刺激模型(如Framingham)更具歧视性,该模型适用于哥伦比亚人口。然而,在全面实施之前,新的前瞻性研究需要验证我们的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cardiovascular Risk Estimation in Colombia Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques.

Introduction: There is no information on the potential of machine learning (ML)-based techniques to improve cardiovascular risk estimation in the Colombian population. This article presents innovative models using five artificial intelligence techniques: neural networks, decision trees, support vector machines, random forests, and Gaussian Bayesian networks. Methods: The research is based on a cohort of 847 patients free of cardiovascular disease at baseline and followed for cardiovascular disease events over 10 years at the Central Military Hospital in Bogotá, Colombia. To enhance the robustness and reduce the risk of overfitting, model evaluation was conducted using a 5-fold cross-validation on the entire dataset. Discriminatory ability was evaluated with the area under a ROC curve (AUC-ROC) for each ML-based model and the Framingham model. Results: Experimental results showed that the neural network technique had the best discriminative ability to predict cardiovascular events, with an AUC-ROC of 0.69 (CI 95% 0.622-0.759) for unbalanced data and 0.67 (CI 95% 0.601-0.754) for balanced data. Other ML techniques also showed good discriminatory ability with AUC-ROC values between 0.56 and 0.65, superior to that observed for the Framingham model (0.53; CI 95% 0.468-0.607). Conclusion: Our study supports the flexible ML approaches to cardiovascular risk prediction as a way forward for cardiovascular risk assessment in Colombia. Our data even suggest that risk prediction using these techniques could be even more discriminative than widely used risk-stimulation models such as Framingham, adapted to the Colombian population. However, new prospective studies need to validate our data before general implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiology Research and Practice
Cardiology Research and Practice Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Cardiology Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies that focus on the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. The journal welcomes submissions related to systemic hypertension, arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, vascular disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信