莫匹罗星鼻冲洗治疗鼻内镜手术后难治性慢性鼻窦炎的疗效观察。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-19 DOI:10.1177/19458924251343389
Russell A Whitehead, Vidit Talati, Ali M Baird, Grant S Owen, Romney Hansen, Peter Filip, Bobby A Tajudeen, Pete S Batra, Peter Papagiannopoulos
{"title":"莫匹罗星鼻冲洗治疗鼻内镜手术后难治性慢性鼻窦炎的疗效观察。","authors":"Russell A Whitehead, Vidit Talati, Ali M Baird, Grant S Owen, Romney Hansen, Peter Filip, Bobby A Tajudeen, Pete S Batra, Peter Papagiannopoulos","doi":"10.1177/19458924251343389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundChronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) can be difficult to treat medically secondary to crusting and biofilms resistant to oral antibiotics. Treatment with topical antibiotics has grown in popularity due to their ability to administer a high local drug concentration while mitigating systemic effects. Published literature on topical antibiotic efficacy for CRS is mixed and sparse.ObjectiveTo describe the efficacy of postoperative topical mupirocin rinses in reducing objective and subjective markers of CRS disease severity.MethodsPatients with suspected biofilm formation following functional endoscopic sinus surgery who were treated with mupirocin 15 mg or 30 mg rinses twice daily between 2018-2023 were included. These patients' symptoms and endoscopic findings were refractory to high-volume steroid irrigations and oral antibiotics. Data collected involved comorbidities, rinse duration, concurrent therapies, Lund-Kennedy (LK) scores, sino-nasal outcome test-22 (SNOT) scores, and adverse effects. LK and SNOT scores were compared across 3 time points (preoperative, 3-month-postoperative-prerinse, postrinse) using one-way analysis of variance and Wilcoxon rank sum for pairwise comparisons.ResultsThirty patients were included. Average age was 63.3 years, 66.7% of patients were female, and 60% had nasal polyposis. There was a statistically significant decrease in LK scores between the 3-month-postoperative-prerinse period and the postrinse period (-0.92 ± 1.25; <i>P</i>-value = <b>.01</b>) whereas the SNOT-22 score reduction was not significantly different (<i>P</i>-value = .62). One patient reported a \"burning sensation\" and stopped after 4-weeks of treatment; no other adverse events were reported.ConclusionTopical mupirocin rinses may result in improvement of CRS burden on endoscopy without a significant reduction in symptoms. Additional studies are necessary to delineate the safety and appropriate duration and dosing of mupirocin rinses as well as to compare mupirocin to standard saline irrigations for treatment of recalcitrant CRS.</p>","PeriodicalId":7650,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","volume":" ","pages":"364-370"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Efficacy of Mupirocin Nasal Irrigations for Treatment of Refractory Chronic Rhinosinusitis After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Russell A Whitehead, Vidit Talati, Ali M Baird, Grant S Owen, Romney Hansen, Peter Filip, Bobby A Tajudeen, Pete S Batra, Peter Papagiannopoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19458924251343389\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundChronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) can be difficult to treat medically secondary to crusting and biofilms resistant to oral antibiotics. Treatment with topical antibiotics has grown in popularity due to their ability to administer a high local drug concentration while mitigating systemic effects. Published literature on topical antibiotic efficacy for CRS is mixed and sparse.ObjectiveTo describe the efficacy of postoperative topical mupirocin rinses in reducing objective and subjective markers of CRS disease severity.MethodsPatients with suspected biofilm formation following functional endoscopic sinus surgery who were treated with mupirocin 15 mg or 30 mg rinses twice daily between 2018-2023 were included. These patients' symptoms and endoscopic findings were refractory to high-volume steroid irrigations and oral antibiotics. Data collected involved comorbidities, rinse duration, concurrent therapies, Lund-Kennedy (LK) scores, sino-nasal outcome test-22 (SNOT) scores, and adverse effects. LK and SNOT scores were compared across 3 time points (preoperative, 3-month-postoperative-prerinse, postrinse) using one-way analysis of variance and Wilcoxon rank sum for pairwise comparisons.ResultsThirty patients were included. Average age was 63.3 years, 66.7% of patients were female, and 60% had nasal polyposis. There was a statistically significant decrease in LK scores between the 3-month-postoperative-prerinse period and the postrinse period (-0.92 ± 1.25; <i>P</i>-value = <b>.01</b>) whereas the SNOT-22 score reduction was not significantly different (<i>P</i>-value = .62). One patient reported a \\\"burning sensation\\\" and stopped after 4-weeks of treatment; no other adverse events were reported.ConclusionTopical mupirocin rinses may result in improvement of CRS burden on endoscopy without a significant reduction in symptoms. Additional studies are necessary to delineate the safety and appropriate duration and dosing of mupirocin rinses as well as to compare mupirocin to standard saline irrigations for treatment of recalcitrant CRS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"364-370\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924251343389\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924251343389","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)在医学上是难以治疗的,继发于对口服抗生素产生耐药性的结痂和生物膜。局部抗生素治疗越来越受欢迎,因为它们能够在减轻全身影响的同时给予高局部药物浓度。已发表的关于局部抗生素治疗CRS疗效的文献是混杂的和稀少的。目的探讨术后局部应用莫匹罗星冲洗液降低CRS疾病严重程度的客观和主观指标的效果。方法纳入2018-2023年功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术后疑似形成生物膜的患者,这些患者每天两次使用莫匹罗星15mg或30mg冲洗。这些患者的症状和内窥镜检查结果对大剂量类固醇冲洗和口服抗生素是难治的。收集的数据包括合并症、冲洗时间、并发治疗、隆德-肯尼迪(LK)评分、鼻-鼻结局测试-22 (SNOT)评分和不良反应。LK和SNOT评分跨3个时间点(术前、术后3个月-术前、术后)进行比较,采用单因素方差分析和Wilcoxon秩和两两比较。结果共纳入30例患者。平均年龄63.3岁,女性占66.7%,鼻息肉病占60%。术后-术前3个月与术后3个月LK评分比较,差异有统计学意义(-0.92±1.25;p值= 0.01),而SNOT-22评分降低差异无统计学意义(p值= 0.62)。一名患者报告有“烧灼感”,治疗4周后停止;没有其他不良事件的报道。结论局部使用莫匹罗星冲洗可改善内镜下CRS负担,但不明显减轻症状。需要进一步的研究来确定莫匹罗星冲洗的安全性、适当的持续时间和剂量,并比较莫匹罗星与标准盐水冲洗治疗顽固性CRS的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Efficacy of Mupirocin Nasal Irrigations for Treatment of Refractory Chronic Rhinosinusitis After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.

BackgroundChronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) can be difficult to treat medically secondary to crusting and biofilms resistant to oral antibiotics. Treatment with topical antibiotics has grown in popularity due to their ability to administer a high local drug concentration while mitigating systemic effects. Published literature on topical antibiotic efficacy for CRS is mixed and sparse.ObjectiveTo describe the efficacy of postoperative topical mupirocin rinses in reducing objective and subjective markers of CRS disease severity.MethodsPatients with suspected biofilm formation following functional endoscopic sinus surgery who were treated with mupirocin 15 mg or 30 mg rinses twice daily between 2018-2023 were included. These patients' symptoms and endoscopic findings were refractory to high-volume steroid irrigations and oral antibiotics. Data collected involved comorbidities, rinse duration, concurrent therapies, Lund-Kennedy (LK) scores, sino-nasal outcome test-22 (SNOT) scores, and adverse effects. LK and SNOT scores were compared across 3 time points (preoperative, 3-month-postoperative-prerinse, postrinse) using one-way analysis of variance and Wilcoxon rank sum for pairwise comparisons.ResultsThirty patients were included. Average age was 63.3 years, 66.7% of patients were female, and 60% had nasal polyposis. There was a statistically significant decrease in LK scores between the 3-month-postoperative-prerinse period and the postrinse period (-0.92 ± 1.25; P-value = .01) whereas the SNOT-22 score reduction was not significantly different (P-value = .62). One patient reported a "burning sensation" and stopped after 4-weeks of treatment; no other adverse events were reported.ConclusionTopical mupirocin rinses may result in improvement of CRS burden on endoscopy without a significant reduction in symptoms. Additional studies are necessary to delineate the safety and appropriate duration and dosing of mupirocin rinses as well as to compare mupirocin to standard saline irrigations for treatment of recalcitrant CRS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.50%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication committed to expanding knowledge and publishing the best clinical and basic research within the fields of Rhinology & Allergy. Its focus is to publish information which contributes to improved quality of care for patients with nasal and sinus disorders. Its primary readership consists of otolaryngologists, allergists, and plastic surgeons. Published material includes peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials, and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信