急性心力衰竭患者服用苏比里尔/缬沙坦:来自PREMIER研究的见解

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Shunichi Doi, Atsushi Tanaka, Keisuke Kida, Takumi Imai, Yusuke Ueda, Yukiko Nakano, Yoshihisa Kizaki, Daiju Fukuda, Yuya Matsue, Yoshihiro J Akashi, Koichi Node
{"title":"急性心力衰竭患者服用苏比里尔/缬沙坦:来自PREMIER研究的见解","authors":"Shunichi Doi, Atsushi Tanaka, Keisuke Kida, Takumi Imai, Yusuke Ueda, Yukiko Nakano, Yoshihisa Kizaki, Daiju Fukuda, Yuya Matsue, Yoshihiro J Akashi, Koichi Node","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study investigated the effect of uptitration of sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEIs/ARBs) on N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level within current guideline-directed medical therapy in acute heart failure (AHF).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This was the secondary analysis in the Program Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition in Admitted Patients with Worsening Heart Failure (PREMIER) study. AHF patients were allocated to switch to Sac/Val or ACEIs/ARBs, and the Sac/Val group was divided into Sac/Val with or without uptitration group (Sac/Val >24/26 mg or ≤24/26 mg twice daily at week 8). The primary endpoint was the proportional change in geometric means of NT-proBNP levels at week 8. A total of 376 patients were included, consistent with the primary analysis in PREMIER. The percent changes in the NT-proBNP level were -51% (Sac/Val with uptitration), -39% (Sac/Val without uptitration), and -32% (ACEIs/ARBs). Their group ratios adjusted for baseline characteristics were 0.72 (Sac/Val with uptitration vs. ACEIs/ARBs, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 0.89; P = .002) and 0.93 (Sac/Val without uptitration vs. ACEIs/ARBs, 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.13; P = .47). However, the Sac/Val without uptitration group yielded a greater NT-proBNP reduction than the ACEI/ARB group (adjusted ratio of change 0.72, 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.94; P = .016) in the subgroup of reduced ejection fraction. There were no adverse events associated with Sac/Val uptitration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Uptitration of Sac/Val therapy yielded a greater NT-proBNP level reduction in AHF patients, but Sac/Val therapy without uptitration also reduced NT-proBNP levels in a subgroup with reduced ejection fraction compared with ACEI/ARB therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uptitration of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Acute Heart Failure: Insight from the PREMIER Study.\",\"authors\":\"Shunichi Doi, Atsushi Tanaka, Keisuke Kida, Takumi Imai, Yusuke Ueda, Yukiko Nakano, Yoshihisa Kizaki, Daiju Fukuda, Yuya Matsue, Yoshihiro J Akashi, Koichi Node\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.05.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study investigated the effect of uptitration of sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEIs/ARBs) on N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level within current guideline-directed medical therapy in acute heart failure (AHF).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This was the secondary analysis in the Program Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition in Admitted Patients with Worsening Heart Failure (PREMIER) study. AHF patients were allocated to switch to Sac/Val or ACEIs/ARBs, and the Sac/Val group was divided into Sac/Val with or without uptitration group (Sac/Val >24/26 mg or ≤24/26 mg twice daily at week 8). The primary endpoint was the proportional change in geometric means of NT-proBNP levels at week 8. A total of 376 patients were included, consistent with the primary analysis in PREMIER. The percent changes in the NT-proBNP level were -51% (Sac/Val with uptitration), -39% (Sac/Val without uptitration), and -32% (ACEIs/ARBs). Their group ratios adjusted for baseline characteristics were 0.72 (Sac/Val with uptitration vs. ACEIs/ARBs, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 0.89; P = .002) and 0.93 (Sac/Val without uptitration vs. ACEIs/ARBs, 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.13; P = .47). However, the Sac/Val without uptitration group yielded a greater NT-proBNP reduction than the ACEI/ARB group (adjusted ratio of change 0.72, 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.94; P = .016) in the subgroup of reduced ejection fraction. There were no adverse events associated with Sac/Val uptitration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Uptitration of Sac/Val therapy yielded a greater NT-proBNP level reduction in AHF patients, but Sac/Val therapy without uptitration also reduced NT-proBNP levels in a subgroup with reduced ejection fraction compared with ACEI/ARB therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiac Failure\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiac Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.05.001\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.05.001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究探讨在急性心力衰竭(AHF)的现行指导药物治疗中,与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻阻剂(ACEI/ARB)相比,增加苏比利/缬沙坦(Sac/Val)对n端前b型利钠肽(NT-proBNP)水平的影响。方法和结果:这是血管紧张素- neprilysin抑制住院加重心力衰竭患者(PREMIER)研究项目的二级分析。AHF患者分为Sac/Val组和ACEI/ARB组,Sac/Val组分为Sac/Val加药组和不加药组(Sac/Val >24/26 mg或≤24/26 mg,第8周每日2次)。主要终点是第8周NT-proBNP水平几何平均值的比例变化。共纳入376例患者,与PREMIER的初步分析一致。NT-pro BNP水平变化百分比分别为-51% (Sac/Val升高)、-39% (Sac/Val未升高)和-32% (ACEI/ARB),经基线特征调整后的组比为0.72 (Sac/Val升高vs. ACEI/ARB, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.59 ~ 0.89;p=0.002)和0.93(未上升的Sac/Val vs. ACEI/ARB, 95% CI 0.76 ~ 1.13;p = 0.47)。然而,Sac/Val无提升组的NT-proBNP降低幅度大于ACEI/ARB组(调整后的变化比0.72,95% CI 0.55 ~ 0.94;P =0.016)。没有与Sac/Val升高相关的不良事件。结论:与ACEI/ARB治疗相比,Sac/Val提高治疗可使AHF患者的NT-proBNP水平降低,但Sac/Val不提高治疗也可降低射血分数降低亚组的NT-proBNP水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Uptitration of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Acute Heart Failure: Insight from the PREMIER Study.

Aims: This study investigated the effect of uptitration of sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEIs/ARBs) on N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level within current guideline-directed medical therapy in acute heart failure (AHF).

Methods and results: This was the secondary analysis in the Program Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition in Admitted Patients with Worsening Heart Failure (PREMIER) study. AHF patients were allocated to switch to Sac/Val or ACEIs/ARBs, and the Sac/Val group was divided into Sac/Val with or without uptitration group (Sac/Val >24/26 mg or ≤24/26 mg twice daily at week 8). The primary endpoint was the proportional change in geometric means of NT-proBNP levels at week 8. A total of 376 patients were included, consistent with the primary analysis in PREMIER. The percent changes in the NT-proBNP level were -51% (Sac/Val with uptitration), -39% (Sac/Val without uptitration), and -32% (ACEIs/ARBs). Their group ratios adjusted for baseline characteristics were 0.72 (Sac/Val with uptitration vs. ACEIs/ARBs, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 0.89; P = .002) and 0.93 (Sac/Val without uptitration vs. ACEIs/ARBs, 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.13; P = .47). However, the Sac/Val without uptitration group yielded a greater NT-proBNP reduction than the ACEI/ARB group (adjusted ratio of change 0.72, 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.94; P = .016) in the subgroup of reduced ejection fraction. There were no adverse events associated with Sac/Val uptitration.

Conclusions: Uptitration of Sac/Val therapy yielded a greater NT-proBNP level reduction in AHF patients, but Sac/Val therapy without uptitration also reduced NT-proBNP levels in a subgroup with reduced ejection fraction compared with ACEI/ARB therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Journal of Cardiac Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
653
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiac Failure publishes original, peer-reviewed communications of scientific excellence and review articles on clinical research, basic human studies, animal studies, and bench research with potential clinical applications to heart failure - pathogenesis, etiology, epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, assessment, prevention, and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信