免疫治疗在多种癌症中的异质性和疗效:来自荟萃分析的见解。

IF 4.3 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Weidong Wu, Bin Liu, Qing Zhang, Xiaojuan Zhang, Pengya Feng, Yongliang Jia, Xia Xue
{"title":"免疫治疗在多种癌症中的异质性和疗效:来自荟萃分析的见解。","authors":"Weidong Wu, Bin Liu, Qing Zhang, Xiaojuan Zhang, Pengya Feng, Yongliang Jia, Xia Xue","doi":"10.1186/s12575-025-00274-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immunotherapy has been recognized as a significant advancement in cancer treatment by promoting the body's immune system to identify and eliminate cancer cells more effectively. Unlike conventional therapies, immunotherapy can enhance the natural capabilities of human immune system. Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy involves genetical-modified T-cells from patients to better catch and attack cancer cells. Up to date, CAR-T therapy has shown particular promise in treating certain types of leukemia and lymphoma, highlighting the transformative potential of immunotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Literature data search using PubMed, CNKI, and Wanfang were searched to collect eligible studies up to January 2025. The primary outcomes of complete response rate (CRR), objective response rate (ORR), dead rate (DR), and other adverse reactions were evaluated. Secondary outcomes (CRR, ORR, and DR) of subgroup analysis from different cancer types, origins, and outcomes for survival rate were analyzed for our final results. A total of 649 studies were initially identified through database searching. After removing duplicates and non-clinical cancer studies, 32 eligible studies were included in this work. The pooled data included 819 patients for objective response rate (ORR), 843 patients for complete response rate (CRR), and 868 patients for dead event. In the included studies, 24 reported ORR data, revealing an objective response rate of 84.86% (695/819) with little heterogeneity (OR: 0.87, 95% CI 0.80-0.91, P = < 0.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 61%); 24 studies showed a CRR of 65.30% (491/843) with significant heterogeneity (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.43-0.72, P < 0.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 84%); 27 studies showed a mortality rate of 23.73% (206/868) with significant heterogeneity (OR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.11-0.32, P < 0.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 77%). Subgroup analysis based on cancer type revealed that ORR was higher in multiple myeloma (86.77%, 400/461) compared with leukemia (84.92%, 259/305) and lymphoma (67.92%, 36/53). In parallel, heterogeneity observed based on case origins suggested that Chinese cases showed significantly higher ORR, CRR, and survival rates compared with American ones.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis provides valuable insights into the potential of immunotherapy, particularly CAR-T, in cancer treatment. Findings showed the different efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in treating multiple cancers, with various objective response rates. Continued studies from more trials with different populations are needed to optimize their efficacy in further cancer treatment and precision medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":8960,"journal":{"name":"Biological Procedures Online","volume":"27 1","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12090696/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heterogeneity and efficacy of immunotherapy in multiple cancer: insights from a meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Weidong Wu, Bin Liu, Qing Zhang, Xiaojuan Zhang, Pengya Feng, Yongliang Jia, Xia Xue\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12575-025-00274-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immunotherapy has been recognized as a significant advancement in cancer treatment by promoting the body's immune system to identify and eliminate cancer cells more effectively. Unlike conventional therapies, immunotherapy can enhance the natural capabilities of human immune system. Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy involves genetical-modified T-cells from patients to better catch and attack cancer cells. Up to date, CAR-T therapy has shown particular promise in treating certain types of leukemia and lymphoma, highlighting the transformative potential of immunotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Literature data search using PubMed, CNKI, and Wanfang were searched to collect eligible studies up to January 2025. The primary outcomes of complete response rate (CRR), objective response rate (ORR), dead rate (DR), and other adverse reactions were evaluated. Secondary outcomes (CRR, ORR, and DR) of subgroup analysis from different cancer types, origins, and outcomes for survival rate were analyzed for our final results. A total of 649 studies were initially identified through database searching. After removing duplicates and non-clinical cancer studies, 32 eligible studies were included in this work. The pooled data included 819 patients for objective response rate (ORR), 843 patients for complete response rate (CRR), and 868 patients for dead event. In the included studies, 24 reported ORR data, revealing an objective response rate of 84.86% (695/819) with little heterogeneity (OR: 0.87, 95% CI 0.80-0.91, P = < 0.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 61%); 24 studies showed a CRR of 65.30% (491/843) with significant heterogeneity (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.43-0.72, P < 0.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 84%); 27 studies showed a mortality rate of 23.73% (206/868) with significant heterogeneity (OR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.11-0.32, P < 0.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 77%). Subgroup analysis based on cancer type revealed that ORR was higher in multiple myeloma (86.77%, 400/461) compared with leukemia (84.92%, 259/305) and lymphoma (67.92%, 36/53). In parallel, heterogeneity observed based on case origins suggested that Chinese cases showed significantly higher ORR, CRR, and survival rates compared with American ones.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis provides valuable insights into the potential of immunotherapy, particularly CAR-T, in cancer treatment. Findings showed the different efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in treating multiple cancers, with various objective response rates. Continued studies from more trials with different populations are needed to optimize their efficacy in further cancer treatment and precision medicine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Procedures Online\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12090696/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Procedures Online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12575-025-00274-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Procedures Online","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12575-025-00274-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:免疫疗法通过促进人体免疫系统更有效地识别和消除癌细胞,已被认为是癌症治疗的重大进展。与传统疗法不同,免疫疗法可以增强人体免疫系统的自然能力。嵌合抗原受体t细胞(CAR-T)疗法涉及来自患者的基因修饰的t细胞,以更好地捕获和攻击癌细胞。到目前为止,CAR-T疗法在治疗某些类型的白血病和淋巴瘤方面显示出特别的希望,突出了免疫疗法的变革潜力。结果:通过PubMed、CNKI和万方检索文献数据,收集到2025年1月前符合条件的研究。主要结局指标为完全缓解率(CRR)、客观缓解率(ORR)、病死率(DR)及其他不良反应。对不同癌症类型、起源和生存率的亚组分析的次要结果(CRR、ORR和DR)进行分析,以获得我们的最终结果。通过数据库检索,初步确定了649项研究。在剔除重复研究和非临床癌症研究后,本研究纳入了32项符合条件的研究。合并数据包括819例客观缓解率(ORR), 843例完全缓解率(CRR)和868例死亡事件。在纳入的研究中,有24项报告了ORR数据,显示客观缓解率为84.86%(695/819),异质性很小(OR: 0.87, 95% CI 0.80-0.91, P = 2 = 61%);24项研究的CRR为65.30%(491/843),异质性显著(OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.43 ~ 0.72, P < 0.01, I2 = 84%);27项研究显示死亡率为23.73%(206/868),具有显著异质性(OR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.11-0.32, P < 0.01, I2 = 77%)。基于肿瘤类型的亚组分析显示,多发性骨髓瘤的ORR(86.77%, 400/461)高于白血病(84.92%,259/305)和淋巴瘤(67.92%,36/53)。与此同时,基于病例来源观察到的异质性表明,中国病例的ORR、CRR和生存率明显高于美国病例。结论:这项荟萃分析为免疫疗法,特别是CAR-T疗法在癌症治疗中的潜力提供了有价值的见解。结果显示,免疫疗法治疗多种癌症的疗效和安全性不同,客观有效率不同。需要在不同人群中进行更多的试验,以进一步优化其在癌症治疗和精准医疗方面的功效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Heterogeneity and efficacy of immunotherapy in multiple cancer: insights from a meta-analysis.

Background: Immunotherapy has been recognized as a significant advancement in cancer treatment by promoting the body's immune system to identify and eliminate cancer cells more effectively. Unlike conventional therapies, immunotherapy can enhance the natural capabilities of human immune system. Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy involves genetical-modified T-cells from patients to better catch and attack cancer cells. Up to date, CAR-T therapy has shown particular promise in treating certain types of leukemia and lymphoma, highlighting the transformative potential of immunotherapy.

Results: Literature data search using PubMed, CNKI, and Wanfang were searched to collect eligible studies up to January 2025. The primary outcomes of complete response rate (CRR), objective response rate (ORR), dead rate (DR), and other adverse reactions were evaluated. Secondary outcomes (CRR, ORR, and DR) of subgroup analysis from different cancer types, origins, and outcomes for survival rate were analyzed for our final results. A total of 649 studies were initially identified through database searching. After removing duplicates and non-clinical cancer studies, 32 eligible studies were included in this work. The pooled data included 819 patients for objective response rate (ORR), 843 patients for complete response rate (CRR), and 868 patients for dead event. In the included studies, 24 reported ORR data, revealing an objective response rate of 84.86% (695/819) with little heterogeneity (OR: 0.87, 95% CI 0.80-0.91, P = < 0.01, I2 = 61%); 24 studies showed a CRR of 65.30% (491/843) with significant heterogeneity (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.43-0.72, P < 0.01, I2 = 84%); 27 studies showed a mortality rate of 23.73% (206/868) with significant heterogeneity (OR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.11-0.32, P < 0.01, I2 = 77%). Subgroup analysis based on cancer type revealed that ORR was higher in multiple myeloma (86.77%, 400/461) compared with leukemia (84.92%, 259/305) and lymphoma (67.92%, 36/53). In parallel, heterogeneity observed based on case origins suggested that Chinese cases showed significantly higher ORR, CRR, and survival rates compared with American ones.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis provides valuable insights into the potential of immunotherapy, particularly CAR-T, in cancer treatment. Findings showed the different efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in treating multiple cancers, with various objective response rates. Continued studies from more trials with different populations are needed to optimize their efficacy in further cancer treatment and precision medicine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Procedures Online
Biological Procedures Online 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: iological Procedures Online publishes articles that improve access to techniques and methods in the medical and biological sciences. We are also interested in short but important research discoveries, such as new animal disease models. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: Reports of new research techniques and applications of existing techniques Technical analyses of research techniques and published reports Validity analyses of research methods and approaches to judging the validity of research reports Application of common research methods Reviews of existing techniques Novel/important product information Biological Procedures Online places emphasis on multidisciplinary approaches that integrate methodologies from medicine, biology, chemistry, imaging, engineering, bioinformatics, computer science, and systems analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信