评估中国的PCL-5:从时间和性别不变的评估中获得的新见解。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Tao Yang, Wei Chen, Qiaodan Lu, Qiufen Meng, Haiyan Liu
{"title":"评估中国的PCL-5:从时间和性别不变的评估中获得的新见解。","authors":"Tao Yang, Wei Chen, Qiaodan Lu, Qiufen Meng, Haiyan Liu","doi":"10.1186/s12991-025-00567-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the latest research, it is proposed that the intrusions symptoms of the structure of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) were divided into internally-generated and externally-generated. Additional research is required to validate this emerging theory. Moreover, few studies have employed longitudinal data to further validate the novel 8-factor model.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to explore the factor structure, gender invariance, and longitudinal invariance of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) among children in post-pandemic era.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was conducted on 1861 children using the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), and 590 children were re-investigated over three months interval. The statistical analysis includes: Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test, the missing rates and descriptive statistics of the study variables, confirmatory factor analysis, the gender measurement invariance, longitudinal measurement invariance, and correlation of each factor within the PCL-5.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the DSM-5 criteria, the results indicated that 6.8% of the children in the sample exhibited symptoms suggestive of possible PTSD. The novel 8-factor model fits better than the DSM-5 model, DSM-5 dysphoric model, Dysphoric arousal model, Anhedonia model, Externalizing behaviors model, and Hybrid model. The measurement invariance results further indicated that the PCL-5 has strict invariance across gender and strong invariance across time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study validated the novel 8-factor model of DSM-5 PTSD among children in the post-pandemic era and assessed the gender and longitudinal measurement invariance of the PCL-5. The novel 8-factor model of the PCL-5 is the best DSM-5 model of PTSD symptoms and has strict measurement invariance across gender and strong measurement invariance across time. The research results extended the theoretical framework and empirical research on the DSM-5 PTSD novel 8-factor model. Through this analysis, we hope to provide more accurate tools and strategies for the evaluation and intervention of post-traumatic stress disorder in children.</p>","PeriodicalId":7942,"journal":{"name":"Annals of General Psychiatry","volume":"24 1","pages":"29"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12087212/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the PCL-5 in China: new insights from its assessments over time and gender invariance.\",\"authors\":\"Tao Yang, Wei Chen, Qiaodan Lu, Qiufen Meng, Haiyan Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12991-025-00567-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the latest research, it is proposed that the intrusions symptoms of the structure of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) were divided into internally-generated and externally-generated. Additional research is required to validate this emerging theory. Moreover, few studies have employed longitudinal data to further validate the novel 8-factor model.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to explore the factor structure, gender invariance, and longitudinal invariance of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) among children in post-pandemic era.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was conducted on 1861 children using the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), and 590 children were re-investigated over three months interval. The statistical analysis includes: Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test, the missing rates and descriptive statistics of the study variables, confirmatory factor analysis, the gender measurement invariance, longitudinal measurement invariance, and correlation of each factor within the PCL-5.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the DSM-5 criteria, the results indicated that 6.8% of the children in the sample exhibited symptoms suggestive of possible PTSD. The novel 8-factor model fits better than the DSM-5 model, DSM-5 dysphoric model, Dysphoric arousal model, Anhedonia model, Externalizing behaviors model, and Hybrid model. The measurement invariance results further indicated that the PCL-5 has strict invariance across gender and strong invariance across time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study validated the novel 8-factor model of DSM-5 PTSD among children in the post-pandemic era and assessed the gender and longitudinal measurement invariance of the PCL-5. The novel 8-factor model of the PCL-5 is the best DSM-5 model of PTSD symptoms and has strict measurement invariance across gender and strong measurement invariance across time. The research results extended the theoretical framework and empirical research on the DSM-5 PTSD novel 8-factor model. Through this analysis, we hope to provide more accurate tools and strategies for the evaluation and intervention of post-traumatic stress disorder in children.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of General Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12087212/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of General Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12991-025-00567-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of General Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12991-025-00567-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:最新研究提出将创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)结构的侵入症状分为内生性和外生性。需要进一步的研究来验证这一新兴理论。此外,很少有研究采用纵向数据来进一步验证新的8因素模型。目的:探讨大流行后时代儿童PTSD量表(DSM-5)的因素结构、性别不变性和纵向不变性。方法:采用《精神障碍诊断与诊断手册-5》(PCL-5)对1861例儿童进行问卷调查,每隔3个月对590例儿童进行再调查。统计分析包括:Kolmogorov-Smirnov正态检验、研究变量的缺失率和描述性统计、验证性因子分析、PCL-5中各因素的性别测量不变性、纵向测量不变性和相关性。结果:基于DSM-5标准,结果显示样本中6.8%的儿童表现出可能的PTSD症状。与DSM-5模型、DSM-5焦虑模型、焦虑唤醒模型、快感缺失模型、外化行为模型和混合模型相比,该模型的拟合效果更好。测量不变性结果进一步表明,PCL-5具有严格的跨性别不变性和较强的跨时间不变性。结论:本研究验证了DSM-5大流行后时代儿童PTSD的新型8因素模型,并评估了PCL-5的性别和纵向测量不变性。PCL-5的新型8因子模型是DSM-5的最佳PTSD症状模型,具有严格的跨性别不变性和较强的跨时间不变性。研究结果拓展了DSM-5 PTSD新型八因素模型的理论框架和实证研究。通过这一分析,我们希望为儿童创伤后应激障碍的评估和干预提供更准确的工具和策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the PCL-5 in China: new insights from its assessments over time and gender invariance.

Background: In the latest research, it is proposed that the intrusions symptoms of the structure of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) were divided into internally-generated and externally-generated. Additional research is required to validate this emerging theory. Moreover, few studies have employed longitudinal data to further validate the novel 8-factor model.

Aim: This study aims to explore the factor structure, gender invariance, and longitudinal invariance of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) among children in post-pandemic era.

Methods: A survey was conducted on 1861 children using the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), and 590 children were re-investigated over three months interval. The statistical analysis includes: Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test, the missing rates and descriptive statistics of the study variables, confirmatory factor analysis, the gender measurement invariance, longitudinal measurement invariance, and correlation of each factor within the PCL-5.

Results: Based on the DSM-5 criteria, the results indicated that 6.8% of the children in the sample exhibited symptoms suggestive of possible PTSD. The novel 8-factor model fits better than the DSM-5 model, DSM-5 dysphoric model, Dysphoric arousal model, Anhedonia model, Externalizing behaviors model, and Hybrid model. The measurement invariance results further indicated that the PCL-5 has strict invariance across gender and strong invariance across time.

Conclusion: This study validated the novel 8-factor model of DSM-5 PTSD among children in the post-pandemic era and assessed the gender and longitudinal measurement invariance of the PCL-5. The novel 8-factor model of the PCL-5 is the best DSM-5 model of PTSD symptoms and has strict measurement invariance across gender and strong measurement invariance across time. The research results extended the theoretical framework and empirical research on the DSM-5 PTSD novel 8-factor model. Through this analysis, we hope to provide more accurate tools and strategies for the evaluation and intervention of post-traumatic stress disorder in children.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.70%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of General Psychiatry considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychiatry, including neuroscience and psychological medicine. Both basic and clinical neuroscience contributions are encouraged. Annals of General Psychiatry emphasizes a biopsychosocial approach to illness and health and strongly supports and follows the principles of evidence-based medicine. As an open access journal, Annals of General Psychiatry facilitates the worldwide distribution of high quality psychiatry and mental health research. The journal considers submissions on a wide range of topics including, but not limited to, psychopharmacology, forensic psychiatry, psychotic disorders, psychiatric genetics, and mood and anxiety disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信