疗养院中的神经性疼痛

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Gisèle Pickering, Marion Voute, Elise Sortais, Nicolas Macian, Leslie Goumy, Fatiha Giron, Bruno Pereira
{"title":"疗养院中的神经性疼痛","authors":"Gisèle Pickering,&nbsp;Marion Voute,&nbsp;Elise Sortais,&nbsp;Nicolas Macian,&nbsp;Leslie Goumy,&nbsp;Fatiha Giron,&nbsp;Bruno Pereira","doi":"10.1002/ejp.70035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>In older persons, pain prevalence is estimated to range between 22% and 80%. In nursing home residents, underevaluated pain is common despite pain management quality indicators. This study aims to assess neuropathic pain (NP) prevalence, NP evaluation and treatment, and healthcare professionals’ practices and needs to optimise NP management.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study received ethical approval [IRB number 2023-CF230]. In order to obtain data from healthcare professionals working in nursing homes, an online survey was conducted on REDCap software between 4 March 2024 and 28 June 2024. The survey was divided into 3 sections: (1) prevalence of NP, (2) assessment of the four steps of the NP management algorithm (detection, evaluation, treatment and re-evaluation), (3) awareness and needs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Responses to the survey came from nine nursing homes, for a total of 841 residents, half of them aged between 75 and 85 years The prevalence of NP was 8.5% [4.2; 12.7]. The clinical pertinence of each step of the algorithm showed good satisfaction (mean ± SD, 7.9 ± 1.5). A large majority of participants (96.8%) expressed the need to receive a specific training on NP management in their care setting.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The prevalence of NP is close to that described in the literature, but appears to be underestimated by the participants because of diagnostic issues. The decision-making algorithm proposed to the teams has shown good results in terms of its usefulness in current practice. The survey also highlighted the need for training in this field to optimise NP management.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Significance</h3>\n \n <p>This survey highlights the underestimated prevalence of neuropathic pain because of lack of diagnosis issues. A 4-step algorithm (detection, evaluation, treatment and re-evaluation) was proposed and validated by healthcare professionals for neuropathic pain management with good results in terms of its usefulness for current practice. Results unveils the still unmet needs for information and training of nursing homes healthcare professionals and medical/nursing students as regards neuropathic pain assessment and treatment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12021,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pain","volume":"29 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejp.70035","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuropathic Pain in Nursing Homes\",\"authors\":\"Gisèle Pickering,&nbsp;Marion Voute,&nbsp;Elise Sortais,&nbsp;Nicolas Macian,&nbsp;Leslie Goumy,&nbsp;Fatiha Giron,&nbsp;Bruno Pereira\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejp.70035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>In older persons, pain prevalence is estimated to range between 22% and 80%. In nursing home residents, underevaluated pain is common despite pain management quality indicators. This study aims to assess neuropathic pain (NP) prevalence, NP evaluation and treatment, and healthcare professionals’ practices and needs to optimise NP management.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study received ethical approval [IRB number 2023-CF230]. In order to obtain data from healthcare professionals working in nursing homes, an online survey was conducted on REDCap software between 4 March 2024 and 28 June 2024. The survey was divided into 3 sections: (1) prevalence of NP, (2) assessment of the four steps of the NP management algorithm (detection, evaluation, treatment and re-evaluation), (3) awareness and needs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Responses to the survey came from nine nursing homes, for a total of 841 residents, half of them aged between 75 and 85 years The prevalence of NP was 8.5% [4.2; 12.7]. The clinical pertinence of each step of the algorithm showed good satisfaction (mean ± SD, 7.9 ± 1.5). A large majority of participants (96.8%) expressed the need to receive a specific training on NP management in their care setting.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The prevalence of NP is close to that described in the literature, but appears to be underestimated by the participants because of diagnostic issues. The decision-making algorithm proposed to the teams has shown good results in terms of its usefulness in current practice. The survey also highlighted the need for training in this field to optimise NP management.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Significance</h3>\\n \\n <p>This survey highlights the underestimated prevalence of neuropathic pain because of lack of diagnosis issues. A 4-step algorithm (detection, evaluation, treatment and re-evaluation) was proposed and validated by healthcare professionals for neuropathic pain management with good results in terms of its usefulness for current practice. Results unveils the still unmet needs for information and training of nursing homes healthcare professionals and medical/nursing students as regards neuropathic pain assessment and treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\"29 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejp.70035\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejp.70035\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejp.70035","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在老年人中,疼痛患病率估计在22%至80%之间。在养老院的居民,低估疼痛是常见的,尽管疼痛管理质量指标。本研究旨在评估神经性疼痛(NP)的患病率,NP的评估和治疗,以及医疗保健专业人员的实践和优化NP管理的需求。方法本研究获得伦理批准[IRB号2023-CF230]。为了获得在养老院工作的医疗保健专业人员的数据,在2024年3月4日至2024年6月28日期间通过REDCap软件进行了在线调查。调查分为3个部分:(1)NP的流行情况,(2)评估NP管理算法的四个步骤(检测、评估、治疗和再评估),(3)意识和需求。结果来自9家养老院的841名居民参与了调查,其中年龄在75 ~ 85岁之间的占一半。12.7]。算法各步骤的临床针对性满意度较好(mean±SD, 7.9±1.5)。绝大多数参与者(96.8%)表示需要在他们的护理环境中接受NP管理的具体培训。结论NP的患病率与文献中描述的接近,但由于诊断问题似乎被参与者低估了。提出的决策算法在目前的实践中已经显示出良好的效果。调查还强调需要在这一领域进行培训,以优化NP管理。意义本调查强调了由于缺乏诊断问题而被低估的神经性疼痛患病率。医疗保健专业人员提出并验证了一种用于神经性疼痛管理的四步算法(检测、评估、治疗和重新评估),并就其实用性而言取得了良好的效果。结果揭示了疗养院保健专业人员和医学/护理学生在神经性疼痛评估和治疗方面仍未满足的信息和培训需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neuropathic Pain in Nursing Homes

Background

In older persons, pain prevalence is estimated to range between 22% and 80%. In nursing home residents, underevaluated pain is common despite pain management quality indicators. This study aims to assess neuropathic pain (NP) prevalence, NP evaluation and treatment, and healthcare professionals’ practices and needs to optimise NP management.

Methods

This study received ethical approval [IRB number 2023-CF230]. In order to obtain data from healthcare professionals working in nursing homes, an online survey was conducted on REDCap software between 4 March 2024 and 28 June 2024. The survey was divided into 3 sections: (1) prevalence of NP, (2) assessment of the four steps of the NP management algorithm (detection, evaluation, treatment and re-evaluation), (3) awareness and needs.

Results

Responses to the survey came from nine nursing homes, for a total of 841 residents, half of them aged between 75 and 85 years The prevalence of NP was 8.5% [4.2; 12.7]. The clinical pertinence of each step of the algorithm showed good satisfaction (mean ± SD, 7.9 ± 1.5). A large majority of participants (96.8%) expressed the need to receive a specific training on NP management in their care setting.

Conclusion

The prevalence of NP is close to that described in the literature, but appears to be underestimated by the participants because of diagnostic issues. The decision-making algorithm proposed to the teams has shown good results in terms of its usefulness in current practice. The survey also highlighted the need for training in this field to optimise NP management.

Significance

This survey highlights the underestimated prevalence of neuropathic pain because of lack of diagnosis issues. A 4-step algorithm (detection, evaluation, treatment and re-evaluation) was proposed and validated by healthcare professionals for neuropathic pain management with good results in terms of its usefulness for current practice. Results unveils the still unmet needs for information and training of nursing homes healthcare professionals and medical/nursing students as regards neuropathic pain assessment and treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Pain
European Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Pain (EJP) publishes clinical and basic science research papers relevant to all aspects of pain and its management, including specialties such as anaesthesia, dentistry, neurology and neurosurgery, orthopaedics, palliative care, pharmacology, physiology, psychiatry, psychology and rehabilitation; socio-economic aspects of pain are also covered. Regular sections in the journal are as follows: • Editorials and Commentaries • Position Papers and Guidelines • Reviews • Original Articles • Letters • Bookshelf The journal particularly welcomes clinical trials, which are published on an occasional basis. Research articles are published under the following subject headings: • Neurobiology • Neurology • Experimental Pharmacology • Clinical Pharmacology • Psychology • Behavioural Therapy • Epidemiology • Cancer Pain • Acute Pain • Clinical Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信