Daniel Bastos Pimenta, Pedro Aurélio Costa Lima Pequeno, Maria Lúcia Absy, André Rodrigo Rech
{"title":"亚马逊无刺蜂花粉生态位的表型、区系和人为驱动因素","authors":"Daniel Bastos Pimenta, Pedro Aurélio Costa Lima Pequeno, Maria Lúcia Absy, André Rodrigo Rech","doi":"10.1111/btp.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Stingless bees (Apidae: Meliponini) are major pollinators in the tropics, supporting key ecosystem services. Yet, stingless bee impact on pollination depends on how many and which pollen types they use, and the relative importance of different factors affecting bee choice for pollen is uncertain. Further, empirical syntheses on bee–plant interactions have largely neglected the Amazon, where stingless bees are major pollinators. Here, we tested phenotypic, environmental, and anthropogenic effects on stingless bee pollen niche across the Brazilian Amazon. We assembled literature data on 242 pollen types collected by 36 species of stingless bees, which were sampled across 1450 km during 1975 to 2012. In this study, the pollen niche is defined by two dimensions: the number and set of pollen taxa collected by stingless bees, representing diversity and composition of the gathered pollen. We modeled the response of the pollen diversity and composition to (1) bee species body mass, (2) tree diversity, (3) tree composition, (4) rainfall, (5) urbanization, and (6) sampling year while accounting for the pollen sampling method, pollen taxonomic uncertainty, and bee phylogenetic relatedness. Pollen diversity decreased with body mass and over time but was higher in urban compared to wild colonies. Pollen composition changed with body mass, tree composition, and year. These relationships were independent of colony sampling method and bee phylogeny and were robust even under uncertainty in pollen taxonomic identification. We show that larger stingless bees are more selective foragers, but much of the variation in their pollen niche across the Brazilian Amazon reflects urbanization, plant resources, and geographical patterns in climate. The long-term change of stingless bee pollen niche can have serious consequences for pollination in the region.</p>","PeriodicalId":8982,"journal":{"name":"Biotropica","volume":"57 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/btp.70049","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phenotypic, Floristic, and Anthropogenic Drivers of the Pollen Niche of Amazonian Stingless Bees\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Bastos Pimenta, Pedro Aurélio Costa Lima Pequeno, Maria Lúcia Absy, André Rodrigo Rech\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/btp.70049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Stingless bees (Apidae: Meliponini) are major pollinators in the tropics, supporting key ecosystem services. Yet, stingless bee impact on pollination depends on how many and which pollen types they use, and the relative importance of different factors affecting bee choice for pollen is uncertain. Further, empirical syntheses on bee–plant interactions have largely neglected the Amazon, where stingless bees are major pollinators. Here, we tested phenotypic, environmental, and anthropogenic effects on stingless bee pollen niche across the Brazilian Amazon. We assembled literature data on 242 pollen types collected by 36 species of stingless bees, which were sampled across 1450 km during 1975 to 2012. In this study, the pollen niche is defined by two dimensions: the number and set of pollen taxa collected by stingless bees, representing diversity and composition of the gathered pollen. We modeled the response of the pollen diversity and composition to (1) bee species body mass, (2) tree diversity, (3) tree composition, (4) rainfall, (5) urbanization, and (6) sampling year while accounting for the pollen sampling method, pollen taxonomic uncertainty, and bee phylogenetic relatedness. Pollen diversity decreased with body mass and over time but was higher in urban compared to wild colonies. Pollen composition changed with body mass, tree composition, and year. These relationships were independent of colony sampling method and bee phylogeny and were robust even under uncertainty in pollen taxonomic identification. We show that larger stingless bees are more selective foragers, but much of the variation in their pollen niche across the Brazilian Amazon reflects urbanization, plant resources, and geographical patterns in climate. The long-term change of stingless bee pollen niche can have serious consequences for pollination in the region.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biotropica\",\"volume\":\"57 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/btp.70049\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biotropica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/btp.70049\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotropica","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/btp.70049","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Phenotypic, Floristic, and Anthropogenic Drivers of the Pollen Niche of Amazonian Stingless Bees
Stingless bees (Apidae: Meliponini) are major pollinators in the tropics, supporting key ecosystem services. Yet, stingless bee impact on pollination depends on how many and which pollen types they use, and the relative importance of different factors affecting bee choice for pollen is uncertain. Further, empirical syntheses on bee–plant interactions have largely neglected the Amazon, where stingless bees are major pollinators. Here, we tested phenotypic, environmental, and anthropogenic effects on stingless bee pollen niche across the Brazilian Amazon. We assembled literature data on 242 pollen types collected by 36 species of stingless bees, which were sampled across 1450 km during 1975 to 2012. In this study, the pollen niche is defined by two dimensions: the number and set of pollen taxa collected by stingless bees, representing diversity and composition of the gathered pollen. We modeled the response of the pollen diversity and composition to (1) bee species body mass, (2) tree diversity, (3) tree composition, (4) rainfall, (5) urbanization, and (6) sampling year while accounting for the pollen sampling method, pollen taxonomic uncertainty, and bee phylogenetic relatedness. Pollen diversity decreased with body mass and over time but was higher in urban compared to wild colonies. Pollen composition changed with body mass, tree composition, and year. These relationships were independent of colony sampling method and bee phylogeny and were robust even under uncertainty in pollen taxonomic identification. We show that larger stingless bees are more selective foragers, but much of the variation in their pollen niche across the Brazilian Amazon reflects urbanization, plant resources, and geographical patterns in climate. The long-term change of stingless bee pollen niche can have serious consequences for pollination in the region.
期刊介绍:
Ranked by the ISI index, Biotropica is a highly regarded source of original research on the ecology, conservation and management of all tropical ecosystems, and on the evolution, behavior, and population biology of tropical organisms. Published on behalf of the Association of Tropical Biology and Conservation, the journal''s Special Issues and Special Sections quickly become indispensable references for researchers in the field. Biotropica publishes timely Papers, Reviews, Commentaries, and Insights. Commentaries generate thought-provoking ideas that frequently initiate fruitful debate and discussion, while Reviews provide authoritative and analytical overviews of topics of current conservation or ecological importance. The newly instituted category Insights replaces Short Communications.