不同路径规划下基于无人机的滑坡三维建模方法评价

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Yunchuan Wang, Jia Li, Long Sun, Ping Duan, Rui Wang
{"title":"不同路径规划下基于无人机的滑坡三维建模方法评价","authors":"Yunchuan Wang,&nbsp;Jia Li,&nbsp;Long Sun,&nbsp;Ping Duan,&nbsp;Rui Wang","doi":"10.1007/s12665-025-12285-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Currently, aerial photographs are acquired by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) along preplanned flight routes, and a 3D model is constructed to investigate and measure the features of geological disasters. In this work, the effectiveness and quality of three kinds of UAV routes used for landslide investigations are explored on the basis of a survey of a landslide in Luquan County, Kunming city, Yunnan Province. The advantages and disadvantages of 3D models based on the \"horizontal round‒trip route (HRr)\", \"terrain follow route (TFr)\" and \"inclined route (Ir)\" methods are studied and compared through quality evaluations of the final products. The results show that the 3D models based on HRr and TFr have different degrees of distortion and blurring, whereas the 3D model based on Ir has a finer surface resolution. Ir offers the best performance among the three routes and can more accurately capture the true surface of the survey features. Correspondingly, the checkpoint accuracies of the HRr, TFr, and Ir methods are 0.155, 0.064 and 0.033 m, respectively, indicating that the 3D model based on Ir is the most accurate. This research indicates that inclined routes provide better applicability in the investigation and monitoring of landslides.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of UAV-based 3D modeling methods for landslides under different route plans\",\"authors\":\"Yunchuan Wang,&nbsp;Jia Li,&nbsp;Long Sun,&nbsp;Ping Duan,&nbsp;Rui Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12665-025-12285-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Currently, aerial photographs are acquired by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) along preplanned flight routes, and a 3D model is constructed to investigate and measure the features of geological disasters. In this work, the effectiveness and quality of three kinds of UAV routes used for landslide investigations are explored on the basis of a survey of a landslide in Luquan County, Kunming city, Yunnan Province. The advantages and disadvantages of 3D models based on the \\\"horizontal round‒trip route (HRr)\\\", \\\"terrain follow route (TFr)\\\" and \\\"inclined route (Ir)\\\" methods are studied and compared through quality evaluations of the final products. The results show that the 3D models based on HRr and TFr have different degrees of distortion and blurring, whereas the 3D model based on Ir has a finer surface resolution. Ir offers the best performance among the three routes and can more accurately capture the true surface of the survey features. Correspondingly, the checkpoint accuracies of the HRr, TFr, and Ir methods are 0.155, 0.064 and 0.033 m, respectively, indicating that the 3D model based on Ir is the most accurate. This research indicates that inclined routes provide better applicability in the investigation and monitoring of landslides.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"volume\":\"84 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12285-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12285-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,采用无人机沿预定飞行路线进行航拍,建立三维模型,调查测量地质灾害特征。本文以云南省昆明市禄泉县滑坡调查为例,探讨了三种无人机航线在滑坡调查中的有效性和质量。通过对最终产品的质量评价,研究比较了基于“水平往返路线(HRr)”、“地形跟随路线(TFr)”和“倾斜路线(Ir)”方法的三维模型的优缺点。结果表明,基于HRr和TFr的三维模型存在不同程度的失真和模糊,而基于Ir的三维模型具有更好的表面分辨率。在三种路径中,Ir的性能最好,可以更准确地捕捉测量特征的真实表面。相应的,HRr、TFr和Ir方法的检查点精度分别为0.155、0.064和0.033 m,表明基于Ir的三维模型是最准确的。研究表明,倾斜路线在滑坡调查和监测中具有较好的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of UAV-based 3D modeling methods for landslides under different route plans

Currently, aerial photographs are acquired by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) along preplanned flight routes, and a 3D model is constructed to investigate and measure the features of geological disasters. In this work, the effectiveness and quality of three kinds of UAV routes used for landslide investigations are explored on the basis of a survey of a landslide in Luquan County, Kunming city, Yunnan Province. The advantages and disadvantages of 3D models based on the "horizontal round‒trip route (HRr)", "terrain follow route (TFr)" and "inclined route (Ir)" methods are studied and compared through quality evaluations of the final products. The results show that the 3D models based on HRr and TFr have different degrees of distortion and blurring, whereas the 3D model based on Ir has a finer surface resolution. Ir offers the best performance among the three routes and can more accurately capture the true surface of the survey features. Correspondingly, the checkpoint accuracies of the HRr, TFr, and Ir methods are 0.155, 0.064 and 0.033 m, respectively, indicating that the 3D model based on Ir is the most accurate. This research indicates that inclined routes provide better applicability in the investigation and monitoring of landslides.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Earth Sciences
Environmental Earth Sciences 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
494
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth: Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信