斑驳景观中涉禽觅食:社会信息、干扰竞争和斑驳选择对猎物摄食和个体分布的模拟效应

IF 2.6 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Hyo Won Lee , Donald L. DeAngelis , Simeon Yurek , Yannis P. Papastamatiou
{"title":"斑驳景观中涉禽觅食:社会信息、干扰竞争和斑驳选择对猎物摄食和个体分布的模拟效应","authors":"Hyo Won Lee ,&nbsp;Donald L. DeAngelis ,&nbsp;Simeon Yurek ,&nbsp;Yannis P. Papastamatiou","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Foragers on patchy landscapes must acquire sufficient resources despite uncertainty in the location and amount of the resources. Optimal Foraging Theory posits that foragers deal with this uncertainty by using strategies that optimize resource intake within foraging periods. For species such as wading birds, this optimization is closely linked to their survival and reproductive success. Understanding the influence of patch selection on individual resource intake and foraging distribution is therefore crucial. In this study, we simulated how resource distribution, interference competition, and social cues—such as aggregation behaviors—influence resource intake and foraging spatial distribution. We employed an individual-based model simulating wading bird foraging behaviors, with 900 individuals simultaneously foraging across a landscape with unknown resource distribution. Birds employed one of three patch-finding strategies: random, cue-searching, or hybrid, which uses both searching strategies. Each bird decided whether to remain in a patch based on a prey density threshold. We compared the daily resource intake and foraging distribution of birds across different modeled patch-finding strategies, resource distribution patterns, and the presence or absence of interference competition. Wading birds exhibiting aggregation behavior displayed increased intake rates when resources were concentrated and interference minimal. Aggregation behavior led to a closer match with the ideal free distribution when the prey density threshold was optimal. These findings provide theoretical support that aggregation behavior is effective in scenarios where resources are concentrated in a few patches, social cues are used by relatively few individuals, and interference competition is limited.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51043,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Modelling","volume":"507 ","pages":"Article 111178"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Foraging of wading birds on a patchy landscape: Simulating effects of social information, interference competition, and patch selection on prey intake and individual distribution\",\"authors\":\"Hyo Won Lee ,&nbsp;Donald L. DeAngelis ,&nbsp;Simeon Yurek ,&nbsp;Yannis P. Papastamatiou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Foragers on patchy landscapes must acquire sufficient resources despite uncertainty in the location and amount of the resources. Optimal Foraging Theory posits that foragers deal with this uncertainty by using strategies that optimize resource intake within foraging periods. For species such as wading birds, this optimization is closely linked to their survival and reproductive success. Understanding the influence of patch selection on individual resource intake and foraging distribution is therefore crucial. In this study, we simulated how resource distribution, interference competition, and social cues—such as aggregation behaviors—influence resource intake and foraging spatial distribution. We employed an individual-based model simulating wading bird foraging behaviors, with 900 individuals simultaneously foraging across a landscape with unknown resource distribution. Birds employed one of three patch-finding strategies: random, cue-searching, or hybrid, which uses both searching strategies. Each bird decided whether to remain in a patch based on a prey density threshold. We compared the daily resource intake and foraging distribution of birds across different modeled patch-finding strategies, resource distribution patterns, and the presence or absence of interference competition. Wading birds exhibiting aggregation behavior displayed increased intake rates when resources were concentrated and interference minimal. Aggregation behavior led to a closer match with the ideal free distribution when the prey density threshold was optimal. These findings provide theoretical support that aggregation behavior is effective in scenarios where resources are concentrated in a few patches, social cues are used by relatively few individuals, and interference competition is limited.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Modelling\",\"volume\":\"507 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Modelling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380025001632\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380025001632","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管资源的位置和数量不确定,但在斑块景观上的觅食者必须获得足够的资源。最优觅食理论认为,觅食者通过在觅食期间使用优化资源摄入的策略来处理这种不确定性。对于涉禽等物种来说,这种优化与它们的生存和繁殖成功密切相关。因此,了解斑块选择对个体资源摄入和觅食分布的影响至关重要。在本研究中,我们模拟了资源分布、干扰竞争和社会线索(如聚集行为)如何影响资源摄入和觅食空间分布。我们采用了一个基于个体的模型来模拟涉禽的觅食行为,900只个体同时在资源分布未知的景观中觅食。鸟类采用三种寻补丁策略中的一种:随机、线索搜索或混合,混合使用两种搜索策略。每只鸟根据猎物密度阈值决定是否留在一个补丁中。我们比较了在不同的寻斑策略、资源分布模式和存在或不存在干扰竞争的情况下,鸟类的每日资源摄入量和觅食分布。当资源集中、干扰最小时,水鸟的取食率增加。当猎物密度阈值为最优时,聚集行为更接近于理想的自由分布。这些发现为聚合行为在资源集中于少数斑块、社会线索被相对较少的个体使用、干扰竞争有限的情况下是有效的提供了理论支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Foraging of wading birds on a patchy landscape: Simulating effects of social information, interference competition, and patch selection on prey intake and individual distribution
Foragers on patchy landscapes must acquire sufficient resources despite uncertainty in the location and amount of the resources. Optimal Foraging Theory posits that foragers deal with this uncertainty by using strategies that optimize resource intake within foraging periods. For species such as wading birds, this optimization is closely linked to their survival and reproductive success. Understanding the influence of patch selection on individual resource intake and foraging distribution is therefore crucial. In this study, we simulated how resource distribution, interference competition, and social cues—such as aggregation behaviors—influence resource intake and foraging spatial distribution. We employed an individual-based model simulating wading bird foraging behaviors, with 900 individuals simultaneously foraging across a landscape with unknown resource distribution. Birds employed one of three patch-finding strategies: random, cue-searching, or hybrid, which uses both searching strategies. Each bird decided whether to remain in a patch based on a prey density threshold. We compared the daily resource intake and foraging distribution of birds across different modeled patch-finding strategies, resource distribution patterns, and the presence or absence of interference competition. Wading birds exhibiting aggregation behavior displayed increased intake rates when resources were concentrated and interference minimal. Aggregation behavior led to a closer match with the ideal free distribution when the prey density threshold was optimal. These findings provide theoretical support that aggregation behavior is effective in scenarios where resources are concentrated in a few patches, social cues are used by relatively few individuals, and interference competition is limited.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Modelling
Ecological Modelling 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
259
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The journal is concerned with the use of mathematical models and systems analysis for the description of ecological processes and for the sustainable management of resources. Human activity and well-being are dependent on and integrated with the functioning of ecosystems and the services they provide. We aim to understand these basic ecosystem functions using mathematical and conceptual modelling, systems analysis, thermodynamics, computer simulations, and ecological theory. This leads to a preference for process-based models embedded in theory with explicit causative agents as opposed to strictly statistical or correlative descriptions. These modelling methods can be applied to a wide spectrum of issues ranging from basic ecology to human ecology to socio-ecological systems. The journal welcomes research articles, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, book reviews, and other communications. The journal also supports the activities of the [International Society of Ecological Modelling (ISEM)](http://www.isemna.org/).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信