{"title":"海洋经济发展示范区能否实现经济发展与生态保护的可持续平衡:来自中国沿海城市的证据","authors":"Fuzhu Li, Yuge Zhang, Shuochen Luan","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Resolving the dilemma of marine sustainable development requires seeking a balance between economic growth and ecological protection. This study treats the policy of Marine Economy Development Demonstration Zones (MEDDZs) as a quasi-natural experiment, relying on data from 47 coastal cities in China from 2004 to 2022. A difference-in-differences (DID) model is constructed to evaluate whether the policy of MEDDZs can achieve a balance between coastal economic development and ecological protection. The findings indicate that the policy of MEDDZs not only drives economic growth in coastal areas but also improves ecological quality, this result holds after considering the validity, endogeneity and robustness of the model. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that, compared to the eastern and southern marine economic circle, there is still considerable room for optimization of the policy effects in the northern marine economic circle. Moreover, synergies with environmental regulation policies can amplify the balancing effects. Mechanism analysis shows that green innovation is the core path for balancing economic development and ecological protection in the MEDDZs, and the green collaborative innovation mechanism performs better than the green independent research and development mechanism. Cost analysis suggests that, compared to implementing ecological protection, promoting economic transformation is the preferred solution for the MEDDZs to balance coastal economic development and ecological protection. Spatial analysis shows that, although the spatial spillover effects of the MEDDZs lead to Pareto improvements, they align with the requirements of regional coordinated development. This study concludes that, in the future, the MEDDZs must balance economic development and ecological protection to serve the fundamental goal of green and coordinated development of the marine economy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":"179 ","pages":"Article 106768"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Marine Economic Development Demonstration Zones (MEDDZs) achieve a sustainable balance between economic development and ecological protection: Evidence from Chinese coastal cities\",\"authors\":\"Fuzhu Li, Yuge Zhang, Shuochen Luan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106768\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Resolving the dilemma of marine sustainable development requires seeking a balance between economic growth and ecological protection. This study treats the policy of Marine Economy Development Demonstration Zones (MEDDZs) as a quasi-natural experiment, relying on data from 47 coastal cities in China from 2004 to 2022. A difference-in-differences (DID) model is constructed to evaluate whether the policy of MEDDZs can achieve a balance between coastal economic development and ecological protection. The findings indicate that the policy of MEDDZs not only drives economic growth in coastal areas but also improves ecological quality, this result holds after considering the validity, endogeneity and robustness of the model. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that, compared to the eastern and southern marine economic circle, there is still considerable room for optimization of the policy effects in the northern marine economic circle. Moreover, synergies with environmental regulation policies can amplify the balancing effects. Mechanism analysis shows that green innovation is the core path for balancing economic development and ecological protection in the MEDDZs, and the green collaborative innovation mechanism performs better than the green independent research and development mechanism. Cost analysis suggests that, compared to implementing ecological protection, promoting economic transformation is the preferred solution for the MEDDZs to balance coastal economic development and ecological protection. Spatial analysis shows that, although the spatial spillover effects of the MEDDZs lead to Pareto improvements, they align with the requirements of regional coordinated development. This study concludes that, in the future, the MEDDZs must balance economic development and ecological protection to serve the fundamental goal of green and coordinated development of the marine economy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marine Policy\",\"volume\":\"179 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106768\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marine Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25001836\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25001836","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Can Marine Economic Development Demonstration Zones (MEDDZs) achieve a sustainable balance between economic development and ecological protection: Evidence from Chinese coastal cities
Resolving the dilemma of marine sustainable development requires seeking a balance between economic growth and ecological protection. This study treats the policy of Marine Economy Development Demonstration Zones (MEDDZs) as a quasi-natural experiment, relying on data from 47 coastal cities in China from 2004 to 2022. A difference-in-differences (DID) model is constructed to evaluate whether the policy of MEDDZs can achieve a balance between coastal economic development and ecological protection. The findings indicate that the policy of MEDDZs not only drives economic growth in coastal areas but also improves ecological quality, this result holds after considering the validity, endogeneity and robustness of the model. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that, compared to the eastern and southern marine economic circle, there is still considerable room for optimization of the policy effects in the northern marine economic circle. Moreover, synergies with environmental regulation policies can amplify the balancing effects. Mechanism analysis shows that green innovation is the core path for balancing economic development and ecological protection in the MEDDZs, and the green collaborative innovation mechanism performs better than the green independent research and development mechanism. Cost analysis suggests that, compared to implementing ecological protection, promoting economic transformation is the preferred solution for the MEDDZs to balance coastal economic development and ecological protection. Spatial analysis shows that, although the spatial spillover effects of the MEDDZs lead to Pareto improvements, they align with the requirements of regional coordinated development. This study concludes that, in the future, the MEDDZs must balance economic development and ecological protection to serve the fundamental goal of green and coordinated development of the marine economy.
期刊介绍:
Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.