Aurélien Saghaï, Oliver C. Moore, Christopher M. Jones, Sara Hallin
{"title":"支持土壤碳积累的种植系统中氮保持和N2O生产的微生物控制","authors":"Aurélien Saghaï, Oliver C. Moore, Christopher M. Jones, Sara Hallin","doi":"10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The fate of nitrate is central for increasing nitrogen use efficiency in cropping systems. It is influenced by ammonifiers and denitrifiers, two microbial guilds that compete for nitrate and contribute to nitrogen retention and loss, respectively, with the latter in the form of dinitrogen gas and the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O). We hypothesized that cropping systems causing higher soil carbon:nitrate favor ammonifiers and thereby lower N<sub>2</sub>O emissions and improve crop yield. We sampled long-term field experiments comparing annual cereal, w/wo straw return, and ley rotations under four fertilization regimes replicated in three pedoclimatic zones in Sweden. Soil carbon content has decreased in the cereal rotations since the establishment of the experiments, whereas positive effects of leys on soil carbon varied depending on clay content. Nevertheless, the ley rotations displayed consistently lower nitrate levels irrespective of fertilization regime, lower N<sub>2</sub>O production rates, and similar or higher cereal yields compared to cereal cropping. Sequencing of 16S rRNA genes showed major differences in the soil microbiome between ley and cereal rotations, with some effects of fertilization. To tease apart effects on the functional guilds, we quantified the genetic potential of ammonifying (<em>nrfA</em>), denitrifying (<em>nirK</em>, <em>nirS</em>) and N<sub>2</sub>O reducing (<em>nosZ</em>I and <em>nosZ</em>II) microbial communities. Nitrate availability rather than carbon content explained the apparent control of carbon:nitrate on ammonifiers <em>vs</em> denitrifiers, with lower levels favoring the former. Altogether, our findings highlight the importance of integrating carbon and nitrogen management strategies to improve soil carbon content while also reducing N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from cropping systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21888,"journal":{"name":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 109858"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microbial controls of nitrogen retention and N2O production in cropping systems supporting soil carbon accrual\",\"authors\":\"Aurélien Saghaï, Oliver C. Moore, Christopher M. Jones, Sara Hallin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soilbio.2025.109858\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The fate of nitrate is central for increasing nitrogen use efficiency in cropping systems. It is influenced by ammonifiers and denitrifiers, two microbial guilds that compete for nitrate and contribute to nitrogen retention and loss, respectively, with the latter in the form of dinitrogen gas and the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O). We hypothesized that cropping systems causing higher soil carbon:nitrate favor ammonifiers and thereby lower N<sub>2</sub>O emissions and improve crop yield. We sampled long-term field experiments comparing annual cereal, w/wo straw return, and ley rotations under four fertilization regimes replicated in three pedoclimatic zones in Sweden. Soil carbon content has decreased in the cereal rotations since the establishment of the experiments, whereas positive effects of leys on soil carbon varied depending on clay content. Nevertheless, the ley rotations displayed consistently lower nitrate levels irrespective of fertilization regime, lower N<sub>2</sub>O production rates, and similar or higher cereal yields compared to cereal cropping. Sequencing of 16S rRNA genes showed major differences in the soil microbiome between ley and cereal rotations, with some effects of fertilization. To tease apart effects on the functional guilds, we quantified the genetic potential of ammonifying (<em>nrfA</em>), denitrifying (<em>nirK</em>, <em>nirS</em>) and N<sub>2</sub>O reducing (<em>nosZ</em>I and <em>nosZ</em>II) microbial communities. Nitrate availability rather than carbon content explained the apparent control of carbon:nitrate on ammonifiers <em>vs</em> denitrifiers, with lower levels favoring the former. Altogether, our findings highlight the importance of integrating carbon and nitrogen management strategies to improve soil carbon content while also reducing N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from cropping systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil Biology & Biochemistry\",\"volume\":\"208 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109858\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil Biology & Biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038071725001518\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038071725001518","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Microbial controls of nitrogen retention and N2O production in cropping systems supporting soil carbon accrual
The fate of nitrate is central for increasing nitrogen use efficiency in cropping systems. It is influenced by ammonifiers and denitrifiers, two microbial guilds that compete for nitrate and contribute to nitrogen retention and loss, respectively, with the latter in the form of dinitrogen gas and the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N2O). We hypothesized that cropping systems causing higher soil carbon:nitrate favor ammonifiers and thereby lower N2O emissions and improve crop yield. We sampled long-term field experiments comparing annual cereal, w/wo straw return, and ley rotations under four fertilization regimes replicated in three pedoclimatic zones in Sweden. Soil carbon content has decreased in the cereal rotations since the establishment of the experiments, whereas positive effects of leys on soil carbon varied depending on clay content. Nevertheless, the ley rotations displayed consistently lower nitrate levels irrespective of fertilization regime, lower N2O production rates, and similar or higher cereal yields compared to cereal cropping. Sequencing of 16S rRNA genes showed major differences in the soil microbiome between ley and cereal rotations, with some effects of fertilization. To tease apart effects on the functional guilds, we quantified the genetic potential of ammonifying (nrfA), denitrifying (nirK, nirS) and N2O reducing (nosZI and nosZII) microbial communities. Nitrate availability rather than carbon content explained the apparent control of carbon:nitrate on ammonifiers vs denitrifiers, with lower levels favoring the former. Altogether, our findings highlight the importance of integrating carbon and nitrogen management strategies to improve soil carbon content while also reducing N2O emissions from cropping systems.
期刊介绍:
Soil Biology & Biochemistry publishes original research articles of international significance focusing on biological processes in soil and their applications to soil and environmental quality. Major topics include the ecology and biochemical processes of soil organisms, their effects on the environment, and interactions with plants. The journal also welcomes state-of-the-art reviews and discussions on contemporary research in soil biology and biochemistry.