{"title":"大多数嫩叶比成熟叶苍白:延迟绿化既不是二元的也不是热带的","authors":"Giancarlo M. Chiarenza, Angela T. Moles","doi":"10.1002/ecog.07185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Delayed greening, the phenomenon in which expanding leaves appear red, blue or pale green due to low chlorophyll content, has long intrigued ecologists. However, little is known about what type of species are most likely to delay greening or which environmental conditions are associated with delayed greening. We spectroscopically quantified leaf pigments in 105 species from 12 representative terrestrial ecosystems, spanning from 16°S to 43°S, and assessed delayed greening as the log ratio of the average chlorophyll content in expanding and mature leaves. Contrary to the traditional binary view of delayed greening, we observed a normal distribution in the level of delayed greening species have, with expanding leaves containing, on average, half the chlorophyll of mature leaves. Surprisingly, there was no significant latitudinal gradient in the level of delayed greening. Herbivory showed no correlation with the level of delayed greening but a positive association with anthocyanin levels. Delayed greening levels tended to be lower in sites with near-neutral soil pH, greater in plant species with higher leaf surface and leaf mass per area, and exhibited no association with soil available nitrogen and organic carbon content. We suggest that a tradition of considering continuous variables in discrete categories can affect the way researchers think about a trait and potentially impede progress in understanding ecological strategy.","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Most young leaves pale in comparison to mature leaves: delayed greening is neither binary nor tropical\",\"authors\":\"Giancarlo M. Chiarenza, Angela T. Moles\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ecog.07185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Delayed greening, the phenomenon in which expanding leaves appear red, blue or pale green due to low chlorophyll content, has long intrigued ecologists. However, little is known about what type of species are most likely to delay greening or which environmental conditions are associated with delayed greening. We spectroscopically quantified leaf pigments in 105 species from 12 representative terrestrial ecosystems, spanning from 16°S to 43°S, and assessed delayed greening as the log ratio of the average chlorophyll content in expanding and mature leaves. Contrary to the traditional binary view of delayed greening, we observed a normal distribution in the level of delayed greening species have, with expanding leaves containing, on average, half the chlorophyll of mature leaves. Surprisingly, there was no significant latitudinal gradient in the level of delayed greening. Herbivory showed no correlation with the level of delayed greening but a positive association with anthocyanin levels. Delayed greening levels tended to be lower in sites with near-neutral soil pH, greater in plant species with higher leaf surface and leaf mass per area, and exhibited no association with soil available nitrogen and organic carbon content. We suggest that a tradition of considering continuous variables in discrete categories can affect the way researchers think about a trait and potentially impede progress in understanding ecological strategy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecography\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ecog.07185\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ecog.07185","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Most young leaves pale in comparison to mature leaves: delayed greening is neither binary nor tropical
Delayed greening, the phenomenon in which expanding leaves appear red, blue or pale green due to low chlorophyll content, has long intrigued ecologists. However, little is known about what type of species are most likely to delay greening or which environmental conditions are associated with delayed greening. We spectroscopically quantified leaf pigments in 105 species from 12 representative terrestrial ecosystems, spanning from 16°S to 43°S, and assessed delayed greening as the log ratio of the average chlorophyll content in expanding and mature leaves. Contrary to the traditional binary view of delayed greening, we observed a normal distribution in the level of delayed greening species have, with expanding leaves containing, on average, half the chlorophyll of mature leaves. Surprisingly, there was no significant latitudinal gradient in the level of delayed greening. Herbivory showed no correlation with the level of delayed greening but a positive association with anthocyanin levels. Delayed greening levels tended to be lower in sites with near-neutral soil pH, greater in plant species with higher leaf surface and leaf mass per area, and exhibited no association with soil available nitrogen and organic carbon content. We suggest that a tradition of considering continuous variables in discrete categories can affect the way researchers think about a trait and potentially impede progress in understanding ecological strategy.
期刊介绍:
ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem.
Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography.
Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.