在心力衰竭管理中,通过个性化利尿剂滴定的护理点试验进行家庭尿钠监测:EASY - STOP研究

IF 16.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Evelyne Meekers, Pieter Martens, Ruben Knevels, Marie Miseur, Athanasius Ezzat, François Croset, Jeroen Dauw, Henri Gruwez, Sebastiaan Dhont, Jonas Erzeel, Marnicq Van Es, Petra Nijst, Frederik H. Verbrugge, Matthias Dupont, Stefan Janssens, Wilfried Mullens
{"title":"在心力衰竭管理中,通过个性化利尿剂滴定的护理点试验进行家庭尿钠监测:EASY - STOP研究","authors":"Evelyne Meekers, Pieter Martens, Ruben Knevels, Marie Miseur, Athanasius Ezzat, François Croset, Jeroen Dauw, Henri Gruwez, Sebastiaan Dhont, Jonas Erzeel, Marnicq Van Es, Petra Nijst, Frederik H. Verbrugge, Matthias Dupont, Stefan Janssens, Wilfried Mullens","doi":"10.1002/ejhf.3693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AimsLoop diuretics alleviate symptoms in heart failure (HF), but despite recommendations for dynamic dosing, implementation in practice remains challenging. The EASY‐STOP trial investigated whether ambulatory urinary sodium monitoring using a point‐of‐care sensor could guide diuretic down‐titration.Methods and resultsThis prospective, single‐centre study enrolled 50 euvolaemic HF patients on stable guideline‐directed medical therapy for ≥3 months and receiving maintenance loop diuretic (≥20 mg furosemide equivalent daily). After a 1‐week baseline phase of daily self‐measured first‐void and post‐diuretic urinary sodium assessment, loop diuretics were gradually reduced by 50% and discontinued when ≤20 mg furosemide equivalents. Urinary monitoring continued for another 3 weeks. Successful down‐titration was defined as remaining congestion‐free (no rise in New York Heart Association class ≥I, oedema, pleural effusion, ascites, rise in right ventricular systolic pressure ≥10 mmHg, or worsening diastolic dysfunction ≥1 grade). Investigators and patients were blinded for urinary sodium analysis during the study. Patients were 75 (68–79) years old, had left ventricular ejection fraction 46 (± 11)%, estimated glomerular filtration rate 47 (35–65) ml/min and N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide 899 (326–2558) ng/L. Among the 50 patients, 62 diuretic down‐titrations were performed, of which 34 (55%) were successful. Baseline urinary sodium before loop diuretic down‐titration was similar between groups. However, patients who successfully achieved down‐titration exhibited a significant increase in first‐void urinary sodium following down‐titration (53–74 mmol/L, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001), whereas those requiring reinitiation showed no significant change (56–58 mmol/L, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.331). A 10 mmol/L increase predicted successful down‐titration with 79.4% sensitivity and 78.6% specificity (area under the curve = 0.851).ConclusionsPoint‐of‐care urinary sodium monitoring may represent a non‐invasive and personalized approach to diuretic titration in HF management. Further trials are warranted to validate its clinical utility and long‐term benefits.","PeriodicalId":164,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Heart Failure","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Home‐based urinary sodium monitoring via point‐of‐care testing for personalized diuretic titration in heart failure management: The EASY‐STOP study\",\"authors\":\"Evelyne Meekers, Pieter Martens, Ruben Knevels, Marie Miseur, Athanasius Ezzat, François Croset, Jeroen Dauw, Henri Gruwez, Sebastiaan Dhont, Jonas Erzeel, Marnicq Van Es, Petra Nijst, Frederik H. Verbrugge, Matthias Dupont, Stefan Janssens, Wilfried Mullens\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejhf.3693\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AimsLoop diuretics alleviate symptoms in heart failure (HF), but despite recommendations for dynamic dosing, implementation in practice remains challenging. The EASY‐STOP trial investigated whether ambulatory urinary sodium monitoring using a point‐of‐care sensor could guide diuretic down‐titration.Methods and resultsThis prospective, single‐centre study enrolled 50 euvolaemic HF patients on stable guideline‐directed medical therapy for ≥3 months and receiving maintenance loop diuretic (≥20 mg furosemide equivalent daily). After a 1‐week baseline phase of daily self‐measured first‐void and post‐diuretic urinary sodium assessment, loop diuretics were gradually reduced by 50% and discontinued when ≤20 mg furosemide equivalents. Urinary monitoring continued for another 3 weeks. Successful down‐titration was defined as remaining congestion‐free (no rise in New York Heart Association class ≥I, oedema, pleural effusion, ascites, rise in right ventricular systolic pressure ≥10 mmHg, or worsening diastolic dysfunction ≥1 grade). Investigators and patients were blinded for urinary sodium analysis during the study. Patients were 75 (68–79) years old, had left ventricular ejection fraction 46 (± 11)%, estimated glomerular filtration rate 47 (35–65) ml/min and N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide 899 (326–2558) ng/L. Among the 50 patients, 62 diuretic down‐titrations were performed, of which 34 (55%) were successful. Baseline urinary sodium before loop diuretic down‐titration was similar between groups. However, patients who successfully achieved down‐titration exhibited a significant increase in first‐void urinary sodium following down‐titration (53–74 mmol/L, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001), whereas those requiring reinitiation showed no significant change (56–58 mmol/L, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.331). A 10 mmol/L increase predicted successful down‐titration with 79.4% sensitivity and 78.6% specificity (area under the curve = 0.851).ConclusionsPoint‐of‐care urinary sodium monitoring may represent a non‐invasive and personalized approach to diuretic titration in HF management. Further trials are warranted to validate its clinical utility and long‐term benefits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Heart Failure\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Heart Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3693\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3693","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

aims - loop利尿剂可缓解心力衰竭(HF)的症状,但尽管推荐动态给药,但在实践中实施仍然具有挑战性。EASY - STOP试验研究了使用监护点传感器的动态尿钠监测是否可以指导利尿剂降滴定。方法和结果:这项前瞻性单中心研究纳入了50例高容性HF患者,接受稳定的指导药物治疗≥3个月,并接受维持循环利尿剂(≥20mg呋塞米当量每日)。在每日自我测量首次尿空和利尿后尿钠评估的1周基线期后,循环利尿剂逐渐减少50%,当呋塞米当量≤20mg时停用。尿路监测又持续了3周。成功的降滴定被定义为保持无充血(纽约心脏协会分级≥I,水肿,胸腔积液,腹水,右心室收缩压升高≥10mmhg,或舒张功能恶化≥1级)。在研究过程中,研究者和患者采用盲法进行尿钠分析。患者年龄75(68-79)岁,左室射血分数46(±11)%,肾小球滤过率47 (35-65)ml/min, N -末端前B型利钠肽899 (326-2558)ng/L。在50例患者中,62例进行了利尿剂降滴定,其中34例(55%)成功。两组间利尿剂循环降滴定前基线尿钠相似。然而,成功实现降滴定的患者在降滴定后首次空尿钠显著增加(53-74 mmol/L, p <;0.001),而需要重新启动的无显著变化(56 ~ 58 mmol/L, p = 0.331)。10 mmol/L的增加预示着成功的下滴定,灵敏度为79.4%,特异性为78.6%(曲线下面积= 0.851)。结论:在心衰治疗中,即时尿钠监测可能是一种无创、个性化的利尿剂滴定方法。需要进一步的试验来验证其临床效用和长期益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Home‐based urinary sodium monitoring via point‐of‐care testing for personalized diuretic titration in heart failure management: The EASY‐STOP study
AimsLoop diuretics alleviate symptoms in heart failure (HF), but despite recommendations for dynamic dosing, implementation in practice remains challenging. The EASY‐STOP trial investigated whether ambulatory urinary sodium monitoring using a point‐of‐care sensor could guide diuretic down‐titration.Methods and resultsThis prospective, single‐centre study enrolled 50 euvolaemic HF patients on stable guideline‐directed medical therapy for ≥3 months and receiving maintenance loop diuretic (≥20 mg furosemide equivalent daily). After a 1‐week baseline phase of daily self‐measured first‐void and post‐diuretic urinary sodium assessment, loop diuretics were gradually reduced by 50% and discontinued when ≤20 mg furosemide equivalents. Urinary monitoring continued for another 3 weeks. Successful down‐titration was defined as remaining congestion‐free (no rise in New York Heart Association class ≥I, oedema, pleural effusion, ascites, rise in right ventricular systolic pressure ≥10 mmHg, or worsening diastolic dysfunction ≥1 grade). Investigators and patients were blinded for urinary sodium analysis during the study. Patients were 75 (68–79) years old, had left ventricular ejection fraction 46 (± 11)%, estimated glomerular filtration rate 47 (35–65) ml/min and N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide 899 (326–2558) ng/L. Among the 50 patients, 62 diuretic down‐titrations were performed, of which 34 (55%) were successful. Baseline urinary sodium before loop diuretic down‐titration was similar between groups. However, patients who successfully achieved down‐titration exhibited a significant increase in first‐void urinary sodium following down‐titration (53–74 mmol/L, p < 0.001), whereas those requiring reinitiation showed no significant change (56–58 mmol/L, p = 0.331). A 10 mmol/L increase predicted successful down‐titration with 79.4% sensitivity and 78.6% specificity (area under the curve = 0.851).ConclusionsPoint‐of‐care urinary sodium monitoring may represent a non‐invasive and personalized approach to diuretic titration in HF management. Further trials are warranted to validate its clinical utility and long‐term benefits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Heart Failure
European Journal of Heart Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
27.30
自引率
11.50%
发文量
365
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Heart Failure is an international journal dedicated to advancing knowledge in the field of heart failure management. The journal publishes reviews and editorials aimed at improving understanding, prevention, investigation, and treatment of heart failure. It covers various disciplines such as molecular and cellular biology, pathology, physiology, electrophysiology, pharmacology, clinical sciences, social sciences, and population sciences. The journal welcomes submissions of manuscripts on basic, clinical, and population sciences, as well as original contributions on nursing, care of the elderly, primary care, health economics, and other related specialist fields. It is published monthly and has a readership that includes cardiologists, emergency room physicians, intensivists, internists, general physicians, cardiac nurses, diabetologists, epidemiologists, basic scientists focusing on cardiovascular research, and those working in rehabilitation. The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Academic Search, Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Science Citation Index.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信